- Nov 30, 2012
- 22,757
- 618
- 121
I was looking into Startisback for Windows 8 and was wondering if it removes Metro? I mean do you get regular Windows again? I plan on installing 8 in a VM to mess around with.
Restored Desktop to its place With StartIsBack, computer starts to desktop. Always. Unlike other tools, which 'skip' Metro by sending keypresses, StartIsBack loads Metro alternative way and keeps it in its place.
I use windows 7 on mine
Ditto! nothing comes close to the real deal~~~ Windows 7 FTW ~~ A REAL OS not some touch screen toy being enforced to use with laptops and desktops
I was reading the comments and one user said, "finally a metro killer." That's all I need to know.
Real men use Linux ,Windows has nothing on Linux apart from gaming.
I should point out on Win8.1 you can boot straight to the old desktop UI.
So Windows 8.1 has the regular GUI that I'm use to? I need to know this because my uncle got a brand new laptop and has sucky Win 8 and he can't use it.
So Mem was wrong.
So Mem was wrong.
I said or meant Win8.1 allows you to boot to the old desktop UI that is very similar to what Win8 has,it does not have the same Win7 UI desktop wise if that is what you are asking.
More info here http://www.extremetech.com/computin...-finally-safe-to-upgrade-from-windows-7-folks (slow website loading wise).
Yeah Win 8.1 boots to the desktop but it doesn't have the classic start menu that Win7 users (and befor) are used to. Its a really minor change and isnt going to satisfy users that were unhappy with metro in the first place.
If it bypasses metro how will users unhappy with metro still be unhappy?
,,,, People firmly in the "I hate Windows 8" camp are going to be unhappy until MS simply puts the Windows 7 interface back and removes Metro completely.
Or offers both? GASP! what a concept!
If it bypasses metro how will users unhappy with metro still be unhappy?
I don't disagree with you. Despite me not really having any major issues with Win8, in all honesty I would just as soon see MS abandon the modern interface. Hell they can just blame it all on Ballmer if they want an easy exit strategy. It seems like a huge waste of resources however to actively develop two distinctly different interfaces for one operating system so for now I can see why MS is focusing mainly on one. Whether they are focusing on the right one is the $64,000 question.
Amazing how addicted to to the Start menu we've become...
Its not so much addicted, its just a neat, efficient way of doing things that suits a lot of people.
Amazing how addicted to to the Start menu we've become. I rented a 1013 Nissan Altima last week and (gasp!) it didn't use a key to start the car (I had to push a button while my foot was on the brake pedal!). Took me a few days to adjust, but I managed it. I also managed to figure out how to join my phone to the BT system, work the lights and wipers, and adjust the interior lighting. Going back to my 2001 Accord seemed, well, archaic.
it's not just that we're used to the start menu, it's that MS made these radical changes in the UI without any explanation as to how to work it. "hey were going to change how you've done everything for the last 20 years and not even give you a first time boot walkthrough as to how this stuff works, just a hint to put your mouse on the edge somewhere"
i'd imagine it's about the same level of jarring change as going from a model T to a cadillac 53. sure, there's still a steering wheel and some pedals and levers, but everything other than the steering wheel works differently.
that said, my pensioner father learned windows 8 and was fine with it within 2 or 3 days.