Originally posted by: spidey07
Originally posted by: Rainsford
I guess the folks at Cisco have never heard of packet shapers. From where I'm sitting, a packet shaper solves the vast majority of the problems a network administrator faces much better than this system they are talking about. Packet shapers allow important traffic to stay fast without resorting to raping your network connection because you wanted to download a Linux distro with bit torrent.
And I'm I the only one who thinks a lot of college network admins need to have that stick removed from their ass? Let's not forget that the network connection isn't provided as charity, students PAY for it.
UM, HELLO JACK ASS.
Packet shapers are expensive and are best used at the edge. this approach I've linked (and has been used for a couple years) is a per port/per IP/per conversation/per hour approach.
IE, much more granular and IMHO vastly superior to trying to manange edge rate-limiting.
Now sit the fvck down and come up with a real comment.
You stupid fvck, don't you EVER DARE call somebody who shapes traffic and manages a network a "network administrator"
NEXT!
<sorry for the hostility but I tend to go off when I post some seriously good stuff and have somebody come in and say "well, gee, packet shapers can do that">
And yes, this post was for the guys trying to stop this crap. And also lure in the young'uns who think it is their right to abuse a network.
OWNED.