How to not be a jerk, according to GamesRadar.
I agree completely with 1 through 7.
10 I disagree completely. Throws are part of the game and they're not really cheap with a 3-frame start-up. Jabbing the opponent usually works...
I can see why 8 is frustrating. I don't know, I guess I don't understand the tactical advantage. The other player reveals his cards, but gains a round. If you sandbag the first round and you're better than your opponent, wouldn't you beat him anyway? If you're of similar skill, he'll have revealed his cards but he's also gained a win (plus he should be able to figure out your sandbagging). If the opponent is better than you, wouldn't he figure out the sandbagging and be able to beat you? I suppose the advantage is more helpful in a best-of-5 instead of a best-of-3.
Of course I have nothing against feeling your opponent out (especially if they're hot) and not revealing your entire gameplan in round 1...
With 9, I can understand that not having a title gets people more matches, and I can understand why noobs don't want to play grand masters (would a complete noob really learn anything from getting double perfected on?). In the end, I feel like people should just be more honest. Learning players should be willing to get owned every now and then (and not worry about getting their 10-ranked wins trochievment) and just play whoever challenges them, and good players should at least put something down to indicate they're not noobs.
I don't know. I guess deception just bothers me, especially pre-match deception. Of course it helps you win and that's the bottom line, but... it's like lying! Sigh, this is what probably will keep me from being a good player.
I agree completely with 1 through 7.
10 I disagree completely. Throws are part of the game and they're not really cheap with a 3-frame start-up. Jabbing the opponent usually works...
I can see why 8 is frustrating. I don't know, I guess I don't understand the tactical advantage. The other player reveals his cards, but gains a round. If you sandbag the first round and you're better than your opponent, wouldn't you beat him anyway? If you're of similar skill, he'll have revealed his cards but he's also gained a win (plus he should be able to figure out your sandbagging). If the opponent is better than you, wouldn't he figure out the sandbagging and be able to beat you? I suppose the advantage is more helpful in a best-of-5 instead of a best-of-3.
Of course I have nothing against feeling your opponent out (especially if they're hot) and not revealing your entire gameplan in round 1...
With 9, I can understand that not having a title gets people more matches, and I can understand why noobs don't want to play grand masters (would a complete noob really learn anything from getting double perfected on?). In the end, I feel like people should just be more honest. Learning players should be willing to get owned every now and then (and not worry about getting their 10-ranked wins trochievment) and just play whoever challenges them, and good players should at least put something down to indicate they're not noobs.
I don't know. I guess deception just bothers me, especially pre-match deception. Of course it helps you win and that's the bottom line, but... it's like lying! Sigh, this is what probably will keep me from being a good player.