Super PI Contest

[Shenkoa]

Test results only posted with a picture showing the results of the 8M calculations. Please list complete system specifications as well. You may only post 1 score for each section (in case you have mutiple rig's)

Well there you have it, the top contenders were not matched.

CPU-Z
Super Pi 1.1
Super Pi SSE 2 Patch
Super Pi SSE 3 Patch
Super Pi Mod 1.4


TOP AMD DUAL CORE (Simultaneous Instances Only)

1. chinkgai: 5m 12s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2894.01 MHz / Ram 1024MB (DC) 263.1 MHz 2-2-2-5 / ????
2. dnavarro: 5m 22s on X2 3800+ Manchester @ 3000.8 MHz / Ram ?#?# (DC) 300 MHz 2-4-3-8 / SSE3 Patched Pi
3. michaelpatrick33: 5m 57s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2750.2 MHz / Ram 2048MB (DC) 1.5-3-2 / SSE3 Patched Pi
4. Duvie: 6m 00s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2640.2 MHz / Ram #?#? (DC) 3.4.4.10 / SSE3 Patched Pi
5. McGeyser: 6m 04s on X2 4400+ Toledo @ 2607.2 MHz / Ram 2048MB (DC) 2.5-3-2 / SSE3 Patched Pi
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.



TOP AMD SINGLE CORE

1. eva2000: 4m 55s on FX-57 San Diego @ 3120 MHz / Ram 1024 Mb (DC) 240 MHz 2-2-2-5 / SuperPi Mod 1.4
2. GuitarDaddy: 5m 26s on FX-57 San Diego 3700+ @ 2815 MHz / Ram 1024Mb 234.6 Mhz (DC) 234.6 Mhz 2-3-2-7 / SSE3 Patched Pi
3. coomar: 5m 28s on 3000+ Venice @ 2700 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 245.5 MHz 2-2-2-6 / SSE3 Patched Pi
4. rise4310: 5m 42s on 3700+ San Diego @ 2750 MHz / Ram 2048 Mb (DC) 250 MHz 2.5-3-3-8 / SuperPi Mod 1.4
5. MADMAX23: 5m 44s on 3200+ Winchester @ 2628 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 239 MHz 2.5-3-3-7 / SSE2 Patched Pi
6. Shenkoa: 5m 47s on 3200+ Venice & 2620 MHz / Ram 1024 MB (DC) 219 MHz 2.5-3-3 SSE3 Patched Pi
7. biff 24 2000: 5m 49s on 3000+ Winchester @ 2700 MHz / RAM 1024 MB (DC) 245 MHz 2.5-4-4-8 / SSE2 Patched Pi
8. n7: 5m 51s on 3200+ Venice @ 2600 Mhz / Ram 2048Mb (DC) 216 MHz 2.5-3-2-10 / SSE3 Patched Pi
9. RichUK: 5m 58s on 3500+ Winchester @ 2550 MHz / Ram 1024Mb (DC) 255 MHz 2.5-4-3-7 / SSE2 Patched Pi
10. BigCoolJesus: 6m 2s on 3500+ Venice @ 2700 MHz / Ram 2048 MB (DC) 200 MHz 3-4-4-8 / SSE3 Patched Pi



TOP INTEL DUAL CORE (Simultaneous Instances Only)

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.



TOP INTEL SINGLE CORE

1. Technonut: 4m 53s Pentium 4 640 @ 4453.4 MHz / Ram 1024MB DDR2 (DC) 3-2-2-4 / SSE3 Patched Pi
2. DarkKnight69: 5m 21s Pentium M 730 @ 2640 MHz / Ram 1024MB (DC) 2.5-2-2 / SSE2 Patched Pi
3. Perpetual: 6m 59s Pentium 4 Northwood @ 3450.5 MHz/ Ram 1024MB (DC) 230 MHz 2-2-2-5 / SSE2 Patched Pi
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

 

[JohnAn2112]

Prime 95 and 8M calculations? I think you're thinking of SuperPI, not Prime 95.

 

[DarkKnight69]

if this is superPI 8m, count my mobile in, ill benchie it when i get home!!!

 

[Shenkoa]

Crap sorry. I am sick with the flu and my brain is not that functional.

 

[coomar]

take the scores from here

 

[Shenkoa]

Done.


Specs Below

My Score

 

[Xonoahbin]

Can you make a section for worst processor running in a main comp? I'm confident I'd win.

 

[GuitarDaddy]

SD3700+ @ 2815mhz.
A8N-SLI deluxe
2x512 OCZ EL PC3200 platinum rev2. 234.6mhz 2-3-2-7


5 min 26 sec

 

[Shenkoa]

What version did you use?

 

[DarkKnight69]

well, here is score #1...

The Dothan was too warm to run 225 so I ran it at 220 for the test.

Pentium M 730 @ 220 (2640mhz) with 1.4V
Crucial Ballistix Tracer (Micron 'C') 1:1 @ 2.5-2-2-5 (2.85V)
Asus P4P800-E Deluxe + Asus CT-479

Linky-5:21

 

[DarkKnight69]

Ill see if I can shim that time another second or two!!!

 

[DarkKnight69]

hmm, seems like not many of these single core AMD's can keep up clock for clock...

 

[Shenkoa]

Thats a good question, but I think clock for clock the Athlon 64 would win in a real world situation but I am not sure.

 

[Duvie]

Originally posted by: Shenkoa
Thats a good question, but I think clock for clock the Athlon 64 would win in a real world situation.

that is why most P-M users run superpi all day!! I am at an all Intel site and I cant get those guys to stop benching 3dmark and superpi 1mb long enough to run an encoding DIVX test, rendering test and about a handful others I asked for....Pretty much their MO!!!!

 

[Shenkoa]

:laugh:

 

[DarkKnight69]

There needs to be somewhere that Intel Pwns!!!

I am just hoping for a good next gen intel. Hopefully this shows some promise, a p-4 at 4 ghz cant run that superpi!

 

[Shenkoa]

Intel VIIV :thumbsup:

 

[Technonut]

4 min 56 sec

 

[McGeyser]

5m 52s This calculation was done using the SSE3 version.




I had task manager open to the performance tab. Both cores were a mirror image of each other the entire run, the strange thing is neither core went over 51%. I tried setting the affinity to just 1 core so as to utilize 100% of 1 core, and Super PI froze, with both SP M 1.4 and SSE3 version. I wonder if theSuper PI mods will ever optimize for dual core and 64-bit.

Here is a screen shot of Super PI at 50% load the enitre run. I tried both SP M 1.4 and SSE3. 1.4 was slower than SSE3 for me.

 

[Perpetual]

6 min 59 sec SSE2 Patched Pi
Not to bad for a 2+ year old P4 CPU. Got some good mileage out of this one.
Just purchased an x2 4400+ and will post again latter with results.

 

[GuitarDaddy]

Originally posted by: Shenkoa
What version did you use?

SSE3 patched

 

[Duvie]

My question is why separate dual core from single core???? duh!!! It is not multithreaded so it will make no difference. MHZ wins here plain and simple with a slight edge on similiar speed system going to highest bandwidth/lowest timings.....

The trick will be I can run it at 8mb while I encode a 5min avi clip on TMPGenc to mPeg2 and still only be a bit behind Darkknight69 and his dothan while he does nothing else....That is priceless!!!!

 

[DarkKnight69]

can you do it? Not that that would surprise me... >500$ processor vs a 200$ processor!!!

 

[Duvie]

Originally posted by: DarkKnight69
can you do it? Not that that would surprise me... >500$ processor vs a 200$ processor!!!

I could do it with a $365.00 dollar 3800+ X2 on a$80 dollar MSI board with no extra adapter I have to pay for....

Yes very easily....superpi will only take 1 core and tMPGenc by default will take only one unless you turn on multithreaded for it.

So the question is if there was a way (which there isn't so far since I tried) to get 2 instance of superpi to run would I get bonus points for running 2 8mb test simultaneously and still getting about a 5:4x or so??? I mean I would be getting 200% more done at only about 5-7% slower....seems like I would win!!!

just joking but trying to shed light on absolutely no need to separate dual core form single core in this test....

 

[CheesePoofs]

6m 21s

A64 Winny @ 2.457 running SSE2 patched version.

EDIT: my ram is at 205 mhz (yeah, talk about an OC )