Miramonti
Lifer
- Aug 26, 2000
- 28,653
- 100
- 106
Surely a brilliant student of the game like Russell supposedly was would know in advance of jury bitterness, would see the history of jury votes based on personality and would be able to play accordingly. If Russell was unable to accept that he needed VOTES to win and was unable to adapt his strategy to take that into account than he clearly was not nearly as brilliant as he thinks he was. Case closed. He had 18 prior seasons to study and he failed to learn that most simple of lessons.
If there's an obvious failure, its like you said...he's been a fan of the game yet didn't learn from the voting aspects. Atleast work the final speech with consideration of lots of bitterness...some sensitivity towards that and reminding people that this was a game, and that most are going to get stabbed in the back anyways, could have gone a long ways.
For a guy so socially perceptive, he should get his @ss kicked for not being more strategic here (and he's probably the one doing it as we speak.)