Tesla Cybertruck

Page 122 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

lxskllr

No Lifer
Nov 30, 2004
59,125
9,560
126
Dunno, when I see pic after pic of the axles being broken off, and/or the ct getting hauled up on a rollback, I'm not impressed. None of that shit matters if it can't do what it says on the box, which is be a truck. It literally does nothing better than even bottomest end 84 Chevy, aside from going fast, and trucks don't need to go fast.

 

bbhaag

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2011
7,105
2,535
146
Whatever bro......You asked about the tech then shit on it when you got an answer you didn't like.
 
Last edited:

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
The tech underpinning the CT is pretty cool.

First on the list is the 48v architecture which is an automotive industry first. The last time the industry went from 6v to 12v was over 70 years ago. Automobiles have advanced a lot since then and a 48v architecture just makes sense.

Second is the steer by wire. Also an automotive industry first in mass production vehicle. Not only is the CT steer by wire but it also has four wheel steering. That is pretty fucking cool on a truck.

Third is the 4860 Gen 2 batteries. These batteries are designed, engineered, and manufactured in house by Tesla. This is another automotive industry first. All other manufacturers rely on third party partners to design, engineer, and manufacture their batteries.

Fourth and probably the one you care about the least about is its performance. The rear motors on the CT are induction motors versus the industry standard permanent magnet motors. The rears motors were designed, engineered, and are manufactured by Tesla. Yet another automotive industry first.

Anyway, these are just a few of the technology advances hidden underneath the skin of the CT. I know you don't do YT but Jason Camissa did an awesome video about the CT around a year ago. He is hands down one of the best automotive journalists.

From a purely automotive engineering perspective the exterior and CEO is the least outrageous part about the CT.

It's really phenomenal technology wrapped in an "unappealing to the masses" package & then KO'd by the CEO's political forays.

I think it stood a chance before the DOGE stuff at $40k & maybe even $60k, but I LOL'd when they sent the $100k price in the pre-order email.

Lucid already technically cracked the 500-mile EV barrier:


I'm just not interested in a sedan. What I'd love is a 500+ mile EV Minivan, like take the VW Bus & put a mega battery in it!
 

GodisanAtheist

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2006
7,933
9,054
136
It's really phenomenal technology wrapped in an "unappealing to the masses" package & then KO'd by the CEO's political forays.

I think it stood a chance before the DOGE stuff at $40k & maybe even $60k, but I LOL'd when they sent the $100k price in the pre-order email.

Lucid already technically cracked the 500-mile EV barrier:


I'm just not interested in a sedan. What I'd love is a 500+ mile EV Minivan, like take the VW Bus & put a mega battery in it!

-Maybe it's my own ignorance at play here, but none of the tech sounds phenomenal or revolutionary or anything. Feels like it's being oversold on hype more than anything.

It really just looks like Musk/Tesla had the will (and a lot of investor money bought with wild promises) to actually implement fairly practical changes that other auto companies making "boring" cars did not have the flexibility to do.

Now we see that the same "go fast break stuff" mentality that allowed the CT changes to happen also allowed the company as a whole to get stuck with this albatross of a CEO around it's neck.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
-Maybe it's my own ignorance at play here, but none of the tech sounds phenomenal or revolutionary or anything. Feels like it's being oversold on hype more than anything.

It really just looks like Musk/Tesla had the will (and a lot of investor money bought with wild promises) to actually implement fairly practical changes that other auto companies making "boring" cars did not have the flexibility to do.

Now we see that the same "go fast break stuff" mentality that allowed the CT changes to happen also allowed the company as a whole to get stuck with this albatross of a CEO around it's neck.

I mean, everything everywhere is evolutionary by nature & by design, but it's really neat to see bold changes in action:


 

LurchFrinky

Senior member
Nov 12, 2003
309
63
101
It's really phenomenal technology wrapped in an "unappealing to the masses" package & then KO'd by the CEO's political forays.
I personally think phenomenal is a little too strong. I can agree with revolutionary or cutting edge though.
And I think "unappealing to the masses" is just completely missing the depth of the quality and design failings.
I will start by saying "the devil is in the details," because other cars have successfully used a stainless steel exterior or an aluminum frame, but these are some of the biggest problems with the CT. They spent so much effort on the technological aspects that they completely lost sight of the overall package. The CT isn't much more than a technology demonstrator at this point.
What is it supposed to be? It doesn't have to fit into any pre-defined category either, but it should be marketed to somebody for some purpose. Is it supposed to be a pick-up truck, a street racer, a long-range road tripper, an off-road master, or a post-apocalyptic survival vehicle? Because it really fails at all of them individually. The only thing it succeeds at is mashing all of that together so it can claim to be the fastest, post-apocalyptic, off-road pick-up truck - because it is the only thing in that category.
And the problem with this is that the owners don't know what they are supposed to do with it and they end up breaking it by trying to rock crawl, or drive in the snow, or ford large puddles, or even driving it on the freeway on a sunny day. These are things that a reasonable person could expect their vehicle to be good or bad at depending on its label or intended purpose, but the CT doesn't have an actual purpose.
And yes, the "driving on the freeway on a sunny day" is a little snarky, but if any part of your vehicle falls off under those conditions then you have quality and/or design issues that are almost unheard of in modern automobile manufacturing.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
I personally think phenomenal is a little too strong. I can agree with revolutionary or cutting edge though.
And I think "unappealing to the masses" is just completely missing the depth of the quality and design failings.
I will start by saying "the devil is in the details," because other cars have successfully used a stainless steel exterior or an aluminum frame, but these are some of the biggest problems with the CT. They spent so much effort on the technological aspects that they completely lost sight of the overall package. The CT isn't much more than a technology demonstrator at this point.
What is it supposed to be? It doesn't have to fit into any pre-defined category either, but it should be marketed to somebody for some purpose. Is it supposed to be a pick-up truck, a street racer, a long-range road tripper, an off-road master, or a post-apocalyptic survival vehicle? Because it really fails at all of them individually. The only thing it succeeds at is mashing all of that together so it can claim to be the fastest, post-apocalyptic, off-road pick-up truck - because it is the only thing in that category.
And the problem with this is that the owners don't know what they are supposed to do with it and they end up breaking it by trying to rock crawl, or drive in the snow, or ford large puddles, or even driving it on the freeway on a sunny day. These are things that a reasonable person could expect their vehicle to be good or bad at depending on its label or intended purpose, but the CT doesn't have an actual purpose.
And yes, the "driving on the freeway on a sunny day" is a little snarky, but if any part of your vehicle falls off under those conditions then you have quality and/or design issues that are almost unheard of in modern automobile manufacturing.

My guess is:

1. Elon had an idea

2. I'm betting people said "don't do it", but got overridden

3. Could have been cooler!



 

bbhaag

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2011
7,105
2,535
146
I saw it yesterday & they lost me at $40,000 lol
Yeah the asking price is steep but at least it comes with a radio and power windows and power locks unlike the Slate.

None of these little trucks matter though because Ford beat everyone to market with the Maverick.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
Bummer for all of the people who were expecting a longer-range CT:


The longest-range CT you an buy is 350 miles for $70k. Note that Rivian has a 420-mile electric truck available today for $87k.

When the company first unveiled the model, it said different versions would have different ranges, including one that has a 500-mile range. Instead, the long-range Cybertruck, which has the longest range, can only last for 350 miles on a single charge. As Electrek noted late last year, the battery pack was supposed to start shipping in early 2025, but Tesla pushed back its release to mid-2025 and also reduced its promised range from 470 miles to 445 miles.

 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
"Cybertruck owners will not get the Autosteer feature they paid for. Instead, they will get a year of ‘Supervised Full Self-Driving’."


Two notes:

1. I'm not sure how this or the battery pack change are legal. Expensive purchases were made with the expectation of future delivery.

2. This is another example of not only "never buy first-generation hardware", but also "only buy features that currently exist TODAY".

Imagine buying a non-FSD Cybertruck with the Extended-Range battery, expecting to get 570 miles, then 445 miles, then being stuck at 350 miles, then having Autosteer taken away. Also, the marketing term "Supervised" Full Self-Driving makes me LOL - how is it "full" if it's not FULL?

After Tesla stopped making new Cybertruck Foundation Series, which are fully loaded with all options, buyers started to have the option of buying the $8,000 FSD package or keeping only the Autopilot package, which is included in the price.

Autopilot’s two main features are Traffic Aware Cruise Control and Autosteer. The first is self-explanatory, while Autosteer is Tesla’s name for active lane keeping.


The vast majority of Tesla vehicle owners don’t buy the FSD package.

As of now, 16 months after Tesla started delivering the Cybertruck, the automaker has yet to deliver Autosteer on the electric pickup truck.

Today, Tesla started reaching out to Cybertruck owners to let them know that it won’t make Autosteer available for Cybertruck owners who haven’t bought FSD:

“As we improve our Autopilot technology, our feature sets will change. Accordingly, Autosteer will not be available for Cybertruck outside of Full Self-Driving (Supervised).“

 
Reactions: misuspita

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
51,233
43,435
136
Also in scrubbed promises Tesla will no longer produce the hyperdrive engine module for the Cybertruck which would get you to Proxima Centauri in minutes.
 
Reactions: Kaido and lxskllr
Dec 10, 2005
27,509
11,852
136
"Cybertruck owners will not get the Autosteer feature they paid for. Instead, they will get a year of ‘Supervised Full Self-Driving’."


Two notes:

1. I'm not sure how this or the battery pack change are legal. Expensive purchases were made with the expectation of future delivery.

2. This is another example of not only "never buy first-generation hardware", but also "only buy features that currently exist TODAY".

Imagine buying a non-FSD Cybertruck with the Extended-Range battery, expecting to get 570 miles, then 445 miles, then being stuck at 350 miles, then having Autosteer taken away. Also, the marketing term "Supervised" Full Self-Driving makes me LOL - how is it "full" if it's not FULL?



View attachment 123422
Yeah, never buying from a company that treats transactions and the earlier claims they made when I was buying like Darth Vader in Cloud City. "I have altered the deal. Pray I do not alter it further."
 
Reactions: Kaido

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,912
1,394
136
i wrote something about tesla and its advantages over the rest of the industry in the elon-twitter thread years ago. tesla has the lead in some areas and is way behind in others. the question was always how long it would take for detroit to catch up on the ev part vs tesla to learn how to build chassis/bodies and human interfaces efficiently.

tesla is ahead in:
  • battery tech and manufacturing/sourcing. mostly due to spending/partnering with panasonic and others. the secondary parts (cooling and charging) are good for cost cutting but horrible for ewaste. the newer battery packs are entirely unserviceable.
  • new manfacturing techniques. tesla has pushed harder into vacuum assisted casting (originally developed by Yamaha, when their 20yr old patents ran out in ~2019 that is when everyone suddenly got hyped for casted parts. anyone who thinks tesla invented gigapress tech has drunk the koolaid or is a reporter who hasnt done their homework) which allows you to make sub-assemblies in fewer steps/stages with fewer tools/machines/employees. that cost savings gives them a huge profit advantage over detroit. ford/gm are starting to use castings but wont see the cost savings for a few years.
  • infrastructure. charging networks, standards, and support required a ton of upfront spending and to their credit tesla pony-upped. though they gave up some of that advantage when they allowed other cars on the network.


tesla is way behind in:
  • basic body manufacturing and best practices. they started really rough in fit and finish such that a majority would never pass customer approval if it wasnt for early adopter blindspot/forgiveness. supposedly they got better but even now i would do a proper inspection with a gap caliper for a new model3.
  • the ui/controls and basic handles is partially tesla thinking they are smarter than everyone else coupled with no one having institutional knowledge about why you dont hide door opening levers on the inside of a wankpanzer in case of collision and fire. some of it is cost cutting as door locks and keys are expensive to keep all the tons of tiny parts in inventory and keep a locksmith on staff, but hiding basic driver controls in 3 levels deep touchscreen menus is just lack of common sense. failsafes and fallbacks exist for a reason. physical controls are the primary failure points but they went too far in trying to cut them out to save on manhours having to deal with the fiddley stuff or designing them to last.
  • tesla lacks a support network of 3rd party parts/service/repair/bodywork. if you cant get a tesla fixed on a reasonable time scale there is less reason to buy.


if you believed elmo's hyped up PR, tesla had the lead in autonomous driving. but their insistence on optical only sensors and no mapping specific roads and letting general ai solve the problems has left them looking like they are now and will be behind waymo and the others. their constant failure to reach FSD when promised and their tendancy to remove features customers have already paid for opens them up to all kinds of lawsuits. same thing goes for the taxi feature.


as for the future:
tesla as a startup had the advantage of no need for pension funding and no union. they have maybe 10 to15 years until their early employees start looking to retire. after that there will be a constant drain on profits like detroit. at that point tesla is on a level playing field. if they cant produce the same yearly number of vehicles as a toyota/ford/gm then the stock price comes into question.

48v system and all wheel steering are neat nice-to-haves, but if the ct cant get the basics of pickup fundamentals like durability and towing then it doesnt matter.
the ct is now tainted with the reputation of a lemon; it has no customer base after elmo's venture into politics; and the ct is unlikely to ever be able to solve the basic problems with not being an actual exoskeleton but rather an aluminum unibody with stainless steel panels that are questionably attached. fixing the design and doing a revision on all the tooling would cost way more than they could make on the low volume of sales it could possibly ever get.
 
Reactions: manly

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
98,911
17,348
126
I will preface this by asking you not to call me nasty names. I am not a MAGAt, Elon apologist, a Nazi, or a fascist. I purchased a Mustang Mach-E because even though the MY was the more sensible choice at the time I can't stand the CEO of Tesla.

The tech underpinning the CT is pretty cool.

First on the list is the 48v architecture which is an automotive industry first. The last time the industry went from 6v to 12v was over 70 years ago. Automobiles have advanced a lot since then and a 48v architecture just makes sense.

Second is the steer by wire. Also an automotive industry first in mass production vehicle. Not only is the CT steer by wire but it also has four wheel steering. That is pretty fucking cool on a truck.

Third is the 4860 Gen 2 batteries. These batteries are designed, engineered, and manufactured in house by Tesla. This is another automotive industry first. All other manufacturers rely on third party partners to design, engineer, and manufacture their batteries.

Fourth and probably the one you care about the least about is its performance. The rear motors on the CT are induction motors versus the industry standard permanent magnet motors. The rears motors were designed, engineered, and are manufactured by Tesla. Yet another automotive industry first.

Anyway, these are just a few of the technology advances hidden underneath the skin of the CT. I know you don't do YT but Jason Camissa did an awesome video about the CT around a year ago. He is hands down one of the best automotive journalists.

From a purely automotive engineering perspective the exterior and CEO is the least outrageous part about the CT.


You read the date right, Infiniti Q50 got steer by wire in 2014.
 

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136


You read the date right, Infiniti Q50 got steer by wire in 2014.

Two key differences:

1. The CT is America's first fully steer-by-wire consumer vehicle:

The Cybertruck is the first vehicle on U.S. roads to go fully steer-by-wire with no mechanical linkage between the front wheels and the steering wheel. Lexus and Infiniti have offered steer-by-wire systems before Tesla, but they had mechanical backups. Powered by the Cybertruck’s 48-volt low-voltage architecture (as opposed to the 12-volt systems in most cars), multiple electric actuators move the front steering rack and turn all four wheels in response to inputs.

Which is pretty neat:

Also, eliminating the physical steering linkage opens up all kinds of packaging possibilities. Cab-over designs are practical again if safety regs will allow them. Swapping a car from right- to left-hand drive could be as simple as pressing a button. Want to drive from the middle like Gordon Murray or move a vehicle around a job site without getting in it? The world is your oyster.

The better question is safety. Tesla says that “the steer-by-wire system is controlled by multiple redundant sensors and actuators,” so that if one component fails, you’re not screwed. If there is an issue, it says, “an alert displays on the touchscreen, a chime sounds, and Cybertruck gradually reduces drive torque while informing you to pull over.” There’s at least one report of this happening via a series of tweets that have now been deleted.

Of course, mechanical steering components can fail, too. Ever seen a car with a wheel askew from a bad tie rod or ball joint? The difference is that these mechanical parts typically wear out and show signs of wear and degradation before failing outright, and a driver might retain some degree of control even with just a single wheel on the ground. Also, steer-by-wire cars still have the suspension components responsible for keeping the wheels in check, so they’re not eliminating the potential for these faults.



2. That allows for variable-ratio dynamic steering: (lower manual wheel turning requirements at different speeds)

The variable ratio translates small inputs into deft maneuvers at parking-lot speeds before relaxing for highway cruising. Paired with the Cybertruck’s four-wheel steering abilities, it makes driving a big vehicle much easier and eliminates wasted effort. As I noted in my full review:

“Instead of going hand-over-hand for 90- and 180-degree turns, you just turn the steering wheel about 75 degrees for a right turn, or as far as it’ll go (roughly 120 degrees) to make a U-turn. There’s no hand-over-hand, no shuffle steering, and no guessing as to how far to turn the wheel. It’s a boon for maneuverability, and paired with the Cybertruck’s EV-typical low center of gravity, goes a long way toward making it feel far more agile than it should.”

Which makes it more responsive than a Porsche, which is incredible for a 6,900-pound vehicle:

You pilot the Cybertruck with a yoke that sweeps through its full range of motion in just 340 degrees—less than one complete turn. That’s possible because the relationship between the driver’s input and the resulting angle at the front wheels is written in code, with all the infinite possibilities that implies. Tesla uses that flexibility to give the Cybertruck the quickest steering of any production vehicle at parking lot speeds and more relaxed responses at highway speeds for smooth, steady control.

Tesla wasn’t the first to put steer-by-wire in a car, but it was the first to realize the technology’s full potential and bring it to U.S. roads. The steering ratio adjusts over a huge spread, from an unheard of 5:1 at a crawl to 12:1 at the top end. If those numbers mean nothing to you, just know this: The Cybertruck’s steering at its slowest is more responsive than the Porsche 911’s variable-ratio rack at its quickest.

The package also includes 4-wheel steering:


The F-150's turning radius is 47.8 feet, whereas the CT is 43.5 feet, which is over four feet shorter:


Whereas I think the CT brand is cooked, I hope to see this technology become more pervasive in the future!
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
98,911
17,348
126
Having a mechanical backup is a safety feature...MB had SBC which was brake by wire. I had it in my 2006 E350 4Matic. It had its own battery backup. The system proved to be unreliable and MB switched it out. But they extended the warranty on it to 25 years.



Four wheel steering is pretty old too. 1987 Honda Prelude had it.
 
Last edited:

Kaido

Elite Member & Kitchen Overlord
Feb 14, 2004
50,111
6,370
136
Having a mechanical backup is a safety feature...MB had SBC which was brake by wire. I had it in my 2006 E350 4Matic. It had its own battery backup. The system proved to be unreliable and MB switched it out. But they extended the warranty on it to 25 years.



Four wheel steering is pretty old too. 1987 Honda Prelude had it.

On the CT:

With experience and knowledge of the underlying engineering, we’ve come to trust the system, too. The front wheels are steered by two motors working in tandem, but you only need one motor to get the truck off the road to a safe spot in the event of a fault. To minimize the possibility of both motors failing at the same time, one draws power from the high-voltage powertrain battery (through a voltage converter) and the other from the 48-volt accessory battery. The angles for the steering wheel and the front wheels are both measured with triple redundancy so that if two sensors ever disagree, the third delivers the tie-breaking vote (and triggers a warning to pull over and have the vehicle serviced).

So it has:

1. Two motors & only needs one
2. Two separate power sources (each motor is separately-powered)
3. Triple sensors

The software safety system kicks in if an issue is detected.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
98,911
17,348
126
On the CT:



So it has:

1. Two motors & only needs one
2. Two separate power sources (each motor is separately-powered)
3. Triple sensors

The software safety system kicks in if an issue is detected.

I don't know what you are arguing. Mechanical backup to an electrical system is a very common practice.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |