Arachnotronic
Lifer
- Mar 10, 2006
- 11,715
- 2,012
- 126
Though just how quickly is this actually? If you consider their 'performance' offerings of A9, A15, A57 they've been on a 2 year cadence in terms of actual shipping SoCs (2010, 2012, then probably this year or early next year for A57.) The 'value' segment seems to be following a similar path with A5, A7, A53 (I'm not certain if A17 should be put there or in a new 'mid range' segment.) Regardless, this is actually a slower cadence of core releases than what you see on the x86 side, which is part of the reason why they can make more drastic changes... and they need to make such changes because of how much ground they can make up by doing so.
Intel is a beast with big core, no doubt -- nobody can touch that.
Intel's little core offerings on the other hand leave much to be desired in terms of release cadence. A Silvermont revision + new 22nm GPU should have been planned in the event that 14nm went awry.
Intel should have stuck with "tick-tock" but it looks like with 14nm (Airmont/Goldmont) they're going to be accelerating that.
We'll see how this all shakes out...interesting times ahead.
Last edited: