You re looking too much at the PR side of thing and i m not interestedby marketing related material
Yet as far as I can tell you're basically quoting FDSOI consortium marketing material as your reference for estimating Intel's costs.
actualy you re understimating thousands
of scientists and engineers that have full understanding of processes
and subsequent devices caracteristics as well as manufacturing tools
requirements , it s not like intel is manufacturing their own lithography
machinery , they have the same supplier , why would it cost them
less if ever they went a triple patterning route.?.
Do you think that ASML will give them a supplement for free.?.
How am I underestimating anything? Sure Intel's process engineers have a full understanding of Intel's processes, subsequent device characteristics, and the manufacturing tools required for such. But are you trying to say that there are thousands of other scientists and engineers that know all that too? I'd sure hope not. I'd expect that you're just advocating that they can make an informed estimate regarding Intel's process costs based on what little public information there is... which can easily be anywhere from right on the mark to off by a factor or two or more depending upon their assumptions. And given that those scientists and engineers making the estimate you're quoting are on the FDSOI consortium's pay roll, well, take a guess at what kind of assumptions they're going to make.
Edit:
I keep the discussion at a level wich can be understood by anybody.
Why exactly? Many times a technical explanation is necessary and failing to provide one is a disservice to everyone taking part in the discussion. Not to mention it gives us a chance to correct misunderstandings.
Last edited: