bystander36
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2013
- 5,154
- 132
- 106
I don't disagree with that.$800 is too much IMO for a 27" TN monitor.
I don't disagree with that.$800 is too much IMO for a 27" TN monitor.
That's not at all what I said. What I was saying is you don't have to pay for any feature upgrade. As in, no one does. You were saying that what if people had to pay an extra $100 for added features. My point is, you already are faced with added cost for features. This is just another one.
And yes, "you" do not have to pay for it, but there are many others who will pay for it.
I just didn't think the idea that other monitor features are all free was accurate.What ever. You have your position you are pushing. Enjoy. eace:
http://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/2014/01/06/nvidia-g-sync-the-missing-link-for-pc-gaming-nirvana/
Lists 5 models that are coming in the next 1-2 months. No pricing information though.
those prices ... they hurt ...
what this means for me is i won't be able to buy until the second generation of Gsync monitors come out , or at least until BenQ makes a decently priced model ..
**cough* bezelless *cough cough* pivot **
I'd be completely okay with a TN based 1440p panel, if it's 120hz with lightboost. That sounds pretty amazing TBH.
We're not completely sure it's TN though, are we ? I was under the impression that only AMVA panels could do 1440p @ 120hz on an official basis. Any LG IPS panel at 1440p/120hz would be out of spec. Not the case with AMVA. At least, that's my understanding.
And AMVA is quite a lot better than TN.
We're not completely sure it's TN though, are we ? I was under the impression that only AMVA panels could do 1440p @ 120hz on an official basis. Any LG IPS panel at 1440p/120hz would be out of spec. Not the case with AMVA. At least, that's my understanding.
And AMVA is quite a lot better than TN.
I'd be completely okay with a TN based 1440p panel, if it's 120hz with lightboost. That sounds pretty amazing TBH.
We're not completely sure it's TN though, are we ? I was under the impression that only AMVA panels could do 1440p @ 120hz on an official basis. Any LG IPS panel at 1440p/120hz would be out of spec. Not the case with AMVA. At least, that's my understanding.
And AMVA is quite a lot better than TN.
My Experience with lightboost is that it makes colors washed out and reduces contrast.
Posted this in the other thread, but thought it should go here as well. Asus does indeed have a 4K GSync model in production, and demoing, but not yet available for purchase. Running at 60fps so obviously is 60hz..not 30hz.
No telling how much it will cost, but should be a very good monitor.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ha6RKoNOc
Way too early, so it's way too expensive. Early adopters, as always, are going to get hammered. Isn't going to hurt much to wait for more selections and by definition, competition. And I'm not much for IPS panels. They were always too slow and had ghosting problems, so I went TN and always have. Better for gamers anyway.
My 1080p 120hz asus sold new for $700 and they only dropped to about $500 now and its TN. I wouldn't expect that new 1440p asus to drop much for a long time.
The only thing that sucks for me, is that by the time the asus is released there won't be any new Nvidia cards out and my 670's will get hammered at 1440p. Not buying 780's either. Too old by the time the monitor is released. Epic first world problems.
Yeah, you're right. That didn't drop a penny. EDIT: forgot smiley
Note that unless directly caused by NVIDIAs own negligence, NVIDIA is not responsible for any product damage or warranty issues, including, but not limited to, the voiding of a third party product warranty that may occur by using, integrating or substituting the warrantied product with or into third party product.