QuikWgn
Senior member
Oh, and trusting Microsoft by saying that they won't let the NSA spy on you? LOOOOL. I wouldn't trust Sony either! When the G man comes knocking, you fall in line real damned fast. The history of tech companies, ESPECIALLY MICROSOFT, is that they do whatever they're damned well told. You want to troll through our servers holding customer data? GO AHEAD! They've done it before, no reason to think they're angels now.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/14/t...mpanies-in-data-bind.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
In a secret court in Washington, Yahoo’s top lawyers made their case. The government had sought help in spying on certain foreign users, without a warrant, and Yahoo had refused, saying the broad requests were unconstitutional. The judges disagreed. That left Yahoo two choices: Hand over the data or break the law. So Yahoo became part of the National Security Agency’s secret Internet surveillance program, Prism, according to leaked N.S.A. documents, as did seven other Internet companies.
But the decision has had lasting repercussions for the dozens of companies that store troves of their users’ personal information and receive these national security requests — it puts them on notice that they need not even try to test their legality. And despite the murky details, the case offers a glimpse of the push and pull among tech companies and the intelligence and law enforcement agencies that try to tap into the reams of personal data stored on their servers.
Plenty of companies have challenged the FISA reuests, but since the hearings are held in closed sessions, the data just isn't out there in plain sight to show how little recourse a company has to fight a FISA request. Even the "NSA letters" sent to ISP's that are far more common are rarely overturned in court when challenged and again the proceedings are covered by redacted warrants and sealed gag-orders.
In addition to Yahoo, which fought disclosures under FISA, other companies, including Google, Twitter, smaller communications providers and a group of librarians, have fought in court elements of National Security Letters, which the F.B.I. uses to secretly collect information about Americans. Last year, the government issued more than 1,850 FISA requests and 15,000 National Security Letters.
Between 2008 and 2012, only two of 8,591 applications were rejected, according to data gathered by the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a nonprofit research center in Washington. Without obtaining court approval, intelligence agents can then add more specific requests — like names of individuals and additional Internet services to track — every day for a year.
Other companies are asking for permission to talk about national security requests. Google negotiated with Justice officials to publish the number of letters they received, and were allowed to say they each received between zero and 999 last year, as did Microsoft. The companies, along with Facebook and Twitter, said Tuesday that the government should give them more freedom to disclose national security requests.