The Pew Pew Thread

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Dave_5k

Platinum Member
May 23, 2017
2,007
3,818
136
Two incidents in same jurisdiction today, two very different approaches… 1) possible, but unconfirmed, suspect in old auto theft chased down with air support, tased and then shot dead. 2)Separate instance, a shoplifting suspect argued with police, then actually fired shots at business from vehicle while fleeing scene… but allowed to drive off with no pursuit and no arrest yet.
Nothing released on either suspect yet, but I’d give very high odds the unarrested active shooter wasn’t dark skinned, and the executed accused thief was.
 
Last edited:

MrSquished

Lifer
Jan 14, 2013
25,873
24,213
136
All this blood is on the hands of the gun industry and conservatives who have refused to entertain any gun control and have turned fetishizing guns into a religion. Their hands are dripping with blood

1 student dead 1 injured -school shooting in Minnesota


2 officers shot on Virginia college campus

 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,050
19,750
146
Girl, 9, dies after mistakenly shot by robbery victim

ABC|45 minutes ago
Houston police say a man who had just been robbed at an ATM opened fire in an attempt to stop his attacker but instead shot a 9-year-old girl in a truck driving nearby



More gunz, gunz, gunz, gunz more gunz .....


If only the 9 year old had had a gun.......

That's not SYG, the moment passed. Wreckless behavior leading to gun death. Sounds like one of those manslaughter cases
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
Girl, 9, dies after mistakenly shot by robbery victim

ABC|45 minutes ago
Houston police say a man who had just been robbed at an ATM opened fire in an attempt to stop his attacker but instead shot a 9-year-old girl in a truck driving nearby



More gunz, gunz, gunz, gunz more gunz .....


If only the 9 year old had had a gun.......

It's stuff like this that really has to call into question the whole "constitutional carry" topic (that was debated in another thread.)

Deciding to carry opens you up to all sorts of dangers and I think the times the actual bodily harm risks you are supposedly protecting against are outweighed by the legal risks are rather rare.

I own, but no interest in carrying.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136

Gun manufacturers now marketing to kids

Serious question tho...

What's the difference between that and say a Ruger 10/22 (that's been made for over 50 years.)

Semi auto, .22LR caliber..

Granddad's old squirrel shooter, or kids first rifle.



Buy a dress up kit, unmount the barrel and receiver, swap out the wooden stock, now it's a Tactical version:


Or get a pistol grip stock and a shorter barrel and throw a red dot optic on the rail:


Or do the bull pup style:


Maybe you like lightweight, long range shooting.. Mount a scope and a composite stock with cheek pad and a bipod



It's all the same gun. Same ammo that's been sold since 1884. Differences are largely cosmetic and parts allow a bit of optimization for your intended usage.

In fact, I'd say it's still the way better buy since it's been made forever by a quality manufacturer, huge aftermarket support, and modular so that you can make it into whatever they want, not just another "AR".

Honestly, Gov Newsom probably gave them the best possible marketing they needed in a competitive market.
 
Last edited:

mect

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,424
1,636
136
Serious question tho...

What's the difference between that and say a Ruger 10/22 (that's been made for over 50 years.)

Semi auto, .22LR caliber..

Granddad's old squirrel shooter, or kids first rifle.



Buy a dress up kit, unmount the barrel and receiver, swap out the wooden stock, now it's a Tactical version:


Or get a pistol grip stock and a shorter barrel and throw a red dot optic on the rail:


Or do the bull pup style:


Maybe you like lightweight, long range shooting.. Mount a scope and a composite stock with cheek pad and a bipod



It's all the same gun. Same ammo that's been sold since 1884. Differences are largely cosmetic and parts allow a bit of optimization for your intended usage.

In fact, I'd say it's still the way better buy since it's been made forever by a quality manufacturer, huge aftermarket support, and modular so that you can make it into whatever they want, not just another "AR".

Honestly, Gov Newsom probably gave them the best possible marketing they needed in a competitive market.
While cosmetic differences may seem trivial, I do think there are important psychological distinctions. The old 10/22 squirrel shooters are psychologically connected to exactly that, rural pest control or target shooting. You start dressing them up in all the tactical dressings, and although it may only be cosmetic changes, the same rifle is now associated instead with killing people. And not just for society, but for the purchaser. When people think that guns that look like tools for killing people are cool, I think that indicates an issue with the psychological connection between that person and their firearm. When it comes to firearms, I think the psychology matters.

You are certainly correct though that firearm manufacturers do love when politicians start to talk about any kind of restrictions on firearms.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,088
6,605
126
While cosmetic differences may seem trivial, I do think there are important psychological distinctions. The old 10/22 squirrel shooters are psychologically connected to exactly that, rural pest control or target shooting. You start dressing them up in all the tactical dressings, and although it may only be cosmetic changes, the same rifle is now associated instead with killing people. And not just for society, but for the purchaser. When people think that guns that look like tools for killing people are cool, I think that indicates an issue with the psychological connection between that person and their firearm. When it comes to firearms, I think the psychology matters.

You are certainly correct though that firearm manufacturers do love when politicians start to talk about any kind of restrictions on firearms.
How many people use guns for self protection compared to the number that have them for that reason? I would suspect the number is pretty small. So the reason most people have weapons for self defense is psychological security. I will want a gun, therefore, that has all of the scary features that cause liberals to faint so I can imagine I’m much safer owning a real scary killing machine rather than one that kac kill uou or a squirrel equally efficiently. And if it’s a liberal breaking in to do harm maybe instead of having to shoot him he will just faint when he sees what is pointed at him.
 

Bitek

Lifer
Aug 2, 2001
10,676
5,238
136
While cosmetic differences may seem trivial, I do think there are important psychological distinctions. The old 10/22 squirrel shooters are psychologically connected to exactly that, rural pest control or target shooting. You start dressing them up in all the tactical dressings, and although it may only be cosmetic changes, the same rifle is now associated instead with killing people. And not just for society, but for the purchaser. When people think that guns that look like tools for killing people are cool, I think that indicates an issue with the psychological connection between that person and their firearm. When it comes to firearms, I think the psychology matters.

You are certainly correct though that firearm manufacturers do love when politicians start to talk about any kind of restrictions on firearms.

Ok, if it's mostly phycological, what do these toys say? Who's calling out and legislating the Nerf company?

If were worried about phycological connections to shooting ppl, why are FPS games a top genre? How many Bay Area software companies like Facebook can pump out virtual shooters with no commentary from the CA gov?
Why's that ok, but the Indiana company has somehow crossed some critical line?



 
Last edited:

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,050
19,750
146
Ok, if it's mostly phycological, what do these toys say? Who's calling out and legislating the Nerf company?

If were worried about phycological connections to shooting ppl, why are FPS games a top genre? How many Bay Area software companies like Facebook can pump out virtual shooters with no commentary from the CA gov?
Why's that ok, but the Indiana company has somehow crossed some critical line?




I agree with mect, and this post. I'm cool with limiting what can be presented to children.

The biggest difference is that nerf isn't real, and neither are games. But as game become more realistic, maybe it's time to consider actually enforcing age requirements.
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,088
6,605
126
I agree with mect, and this post. I'm cool with limiting what can be presented to children.

The biggest difference is that nerf isn't real, and neither are games. But as game become more realistic, maybe it's time to consider actually enforcing age requirements.
Maybe we should focus on what makes people magnetized by violence. Maybe there is something about our culture that is sick, creating an us vs them mentality and all of the need to feel secure by being able to kill people and lust over violence in film and the media. Don’t you just love it when the bad guys get their just deserts? Don’t you want to be a part of that even if only in a film or a game. Can you see the Buddha doing that? I can’t.
 

mect

Platinum Member
Jan 5, 2004
2,424
1,636
136
I agree with mect, and this post. I'm cool with limiting what can be presented to children.

The biggest difference is that nerf isn't real, and neither are games. But as game become more realistic, maybe it's time to consider actually enforcing age requirements.
Or at least studying the effect. I'm all for allowing people to do what they want as long as it isn't hurting anyone, but guns hurt a lot of people in this country.
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,050
19,750
146
Maybe we should focus on what makes people magnetized by violence. Maybe there is something about our culture that is sick, creating an us vs them mentality and all of the need to feel secure by being able to kill people and lust over violence in film and the media. Don’t you just love it when the bad guys get their just deserts? Don’t you want to be a part of that even if only in a film or a game. Can you see the Buddha doing that? I can’t.
Our fascination with violence is deep and historic. It's lauded in almost every way.

But don't show a boob on tv, even on accident.

You're never gonna kick the violence addiction in the USA
 

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,050
19,750
146
Or at least studying the effect. I'm all for allowing people to do what they want as long as it isn't hurting anyone, but guns hurt a lot of people in this country.

Yea they do, and most of it isn't necessary.

As far as nerf goes, my anecdotal xp is that my kids have that stuff. They pulled the tips off of a bunch of darts and hot glued thumbtacks in them. So I had to make sure they were treating them as actual guns and the hallway they were firing them down was always clear before firing at their target.

How many parents are even around to do that, how many kids are just influenced by the violence in movies and media. Many...

I posted that link about the IL gun company marketing to children because it came across my internets and I found it interesting. It seems that in our highly politicized political climate, that maker thinks its a good marketing move. I'd say they're right, Americans fetish for firearms makes it easy to sell stuff like this, even to children. Besides why wouldn't little Sally or Timmy need a scary looking gun to defend themselves or become the next active shooter. Combine this mentality with states dropping control and gun deaths are sure to climb.
 
Last edited:

Captante

Lifer
Oct 20, 2003
30,337
10,855
136
NRA myth: The NRA says having more guns makes people safer.

Fact: Gun ownership is directly linked to higher instances of gun violence.

 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |