Hans Gruber
Platinum Member
- Dec 23, 2006
- 2,203
- 1,145
- 136
I think hell will freeze over before that happens. Or VRAM price craters to the point where they have to give it away.There should be a 7600xt with 16GB of vram. There should be a 7800xt with 20-24GB of vram.
Vram prices are in the toilet. I do not understand why 16GB is not the standard base Vram configuration. There should be 32GB vram cards at the top level.I think hell will freeze over before that happens. Or VRAM price craters to the point where they have to give it away.
Geforce cards are more CPU bottlenecked than AMD cards due to driver overhead. So you can't return the 4070? If not, that really sucks. Guess your next upgrade should be the CPU to a 5800X3D.I dont think it was bottlenecked.
Vram prices are in the toilet. I do not understand why 16GB is not the standard base Vram configuration. There should be 32GB vram cards at the top level.
Yes, we can't ask them to impede the Quadro market. I guess they call the Quadro cards the A series of professional cards with a fancy card markup over consumer cards.Best argument I've seen for that is cards with more ram would interfere with the professional market. People might skimp on the 5k+ pro cards with the $1500 card with 24-32GB of ram. Like they have in the past.
r7-5700x
DDR4 3200 32gb
NVME W Black 1TB
B450m
2560x1440/144hz LG IPS 32"
I dont think it was bottlenecked.
I just anticipated a bit more from a $550 card vs. the 3060ti.
There is more to VRAM cost than the chips, that being increased die size caused by increased memory bus or altenatively backside VRAM. Both cost moneyVram prices are in the toilet. I do not understand why 16GB is not the standard base Vram configuration. There should be 32GB vram cards at the top level.
In Starfield you'll be cpu limited in most cities. Should be seeing drops into the 50s, especially in New Atlantis.r7-5700x
DDR4 3200 32gb
NVME W Black 1TB
B450m
2560x1440/144hz LG IPS 32"
I dont think it was bottlenecked.
I just anticipated a bit more from a $550 card vs. the 3060ti.
sorry I was hitting the sauce pretty hard last night.
one example, starfield, ran like trash on the 3060ti, it ran like leftovers contemplating being trash on the 4070. the other games I play, i didn't notice substantial improvement.
Does that mean AMD loses money on their cheap 12GB cards? Somehow I think not.There is more to VRAM cost than the chips, that being increased die size caused by increased memory bus or altenatively backside VRAM. Both cost money
If refering to RDNA2 with its much cheaper 7nm, then no, they are not necessarily losing money. Margins are smaller (just looking at their official margins) but they have better maneuvarability in terms of prices with respect to VRAM. Even more than Nvidia's current and last gen who while last gen had Ampere using a cheaper Samsung node, most of their GPUs were limited by the 1GB GDDR6X RAM chips that were available for most of the architecture's lifetimeDoes that mean AMD loses money on their cheap 12GB cards? Somehow I think not.