CZroe
Lifer
- Jun 24, 2001
- 24,195
- 857
- 126
No they are new here in the north. Deer ticks too. Some parts of Canada had them but not here. There's all sorts of advisories and such from the government too. It's a pretty serious issue, hopefully they can figure something out, maybe this is going to be one of those things where every couple years they are strong but rest they are dormant. Kinda like tent caterpillars. Though I have a bad feeling they are here to stay, this is more of a climate change thing.
As a kid I used to go play in the bush all the time, ticks were never an issue. If yes I'd probably be dead or severely ill now.
Ticks. Are. Not. New. To. Canada.
That article I showed accepting that is from a Canadian perspective and several years old but every populated region of Canada that isn’t actively treated has had ticks since before they had people. "Some parts" of Canada had more than others but that’s just the varying population density I keep mentioning. All populated areas of Canada have had some non zero level of natural tick activity since before they were ever populated. It’s bizarre that you are so convinced of the opposite when there is literally nothing to suggest otherwise.
Ticks don’t live in the desert and ticks don’t live in Antarctica but they darn sure live in the populated regions of Canada. This isn’t "new." Perhaps a certain species or population explosion or pathogen is "new" to your region but you keep reacting to every tick sighting in your area and saying that is "new" regardless of species.