Ktulu
Diamond Member
- Dec 16, 2000
- 4,354
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: KnightBreed
What kind of improvements can one expect just relying on nervous system development? Any links to workout programs or just general info that might help make better use of existing muscle mass?
Originally posted by: Insomniator
ugh my knees reallly crack when doing full squats. Who would I go to to get it checked out? Doctor or chiro?
The way that guy benches is weird, I did it today and its hard to arch my back like that but it did feel stronger than the normal noob way of doing it.
Originally posted by: Insomniator
The way that guy benches is weird, I did it today and its hard to arch my back like that but it did feel stronger than the normal noob way of doing it.
Originally posted by: katank
Originally posted by: Insomniator
The way that guy benches is weird, I did it today and its hard to arch my back like that but it did feel stronger than the normal noob way of doing it.
What David Tate advocates is definitely the powerlifter way of benching. There's no argument that this will boost your numbers quite a bit.
However, I'm frankly not convinced that it's the best for general strength development. You may be better served with a less extreme arch that keeps your butt on the bench. Frankly, Mark Rippetoe's style of benching has more appeal to me. Tate's approach when taken to its limit will essentially become an inverted dip using weights rather than body with limited ROM (to abdomen).
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Originally posted by: katank
Originally posted by: Insomniator
The way that guy benches is weird, I did it today and its hard to arch my back like that but it did feel stronger than the normal noob way of doing it.
What David Tate advocates is definitely the powerlifter way of benching. There's no argument that this will boost your numbers quite a bit.
However, I'm frankly not convinced that it's the best for general strength development. You may be better served with a less extreme arch that keeps your butt on the bench. Frankly, Mark Rippetoe's style of benching has more appeal to me. Tate's approach when taken to its limit will essentially become an inverted dip using weights rather than body with limited ROM (to abdomen).
Tate never advocates any portion of the body coming up. I agree that Rippetoe's is more logical in functionality and real life, but Tate's method is great for putting up big numbers. If you do it right, it's safe as well. If the butt came up though, it wouldn't be safe at all. Perhaps that's the way you have tried to keep your upper back tight by putting more weight on it, but that's not what he suggests.
Originally posted by: katank
Now that I went back and looked at Tate's video again, indeed the butt's firmly on the bench. Nevertheless, you can see lots of space between body and bench with his method. Also, the work yourself down the bench to obtain that arch and reduced ROM makes it less functional. The point is that his claims of being able to put 50lbs on your bench quickly is not actually as much of a strength increase as it might seem at face value.
Originally posted by: Insomniator
He was talking about 50 pounds on squats, not bench...
Originally posted by: SociallyChallenged
Originally posted by: Insomniator
He was talking about 50 pounds on squats, not bench...
Where on earth does he talk about squats in his bench video? I don't remember that at all.