Ricemarine
Lifer
- Sep 10, 2004
- 10,507
- 0
- 0
doneOriginally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
I'm guessing the new trend will be adding a disclaimer to your signature.
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: labgeek
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: labgeek
What I like... giving sleeping pills = cruelty.
Last time I checked, wasn't OD'ing on sleeping pills the "easy painless way" to commit suicide? You just go to sleep and not wake up. So what he should have shot it instead?
Nah, the cruelty part is where he drugged it AFTER he already had it trapped. Trap it, take it off the property, and release it like the law says you're supposed to in California. Not trap it, drug it, release it next to the pool, let it drown, etc.
taken means killed when referring to game.
Apparently you can't read.
Fish and Game regulations prohibit the relocation of skunks and other wildlife without written permission of the Department of Fish and Game. The prevalence of rabies in the skunk population is one of several major reasons for denying relocation.
Apparently neither can you.
The California Fish and Game Code classifies skunks as nongame mammals. Nongame mammals that are injuring or threatening property may be taken by the owner or tenant of the premises at any time and in any legal manner.
Originally posted by: bootymac
WEINERS WEINERS WEINERS
PUT THEM IN YOUR MOUTH
Originally posted by: squirrel dog
How in the hayell did you get a skunk to take pills ??I have two dogs and a cat and I cant get them to take any kind of pill . I put it in cheese,they eat the cheese,spit put the pill .
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
what the heck happened in this thread that there are almost 500 posts!?
Originally posted by: Compton
Originally posted by: EvilYoda
what the heck happened in this thread that there are almost 500 posts!?
About 100 of the posts were made by one member.
Originally posted by: junkerman123
Idiot's Guide to boosting your post count (by Nik):
This thread: 95 replies, 19 by Nik.
Total percentage of posts in this thread by Nik: 20%
Total replies by Nik that were actually considered and accepted as logical and acceptable by the general public: 0
Originally posted by: rudder
Good Shens post.
WHy is it shens? who would give a crap about a skunk?
Originally posted by: meltdown75
bah. half the idiots b1tching about cruelty to animals were bragging about the myriad of ways they love to torture insects last week.
what's the difference. this is the mehest controversy ever. drama queens
Originally posted by: JasonSix78
Wow, some of you people are so passionate about animals, yet, when it comes to the well being of humans you could care less. It's sad really. I wish you people would use some of that passion to actually do something beneficial to society.
-Jason
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Skunk to the OP before falling in the pool: "You're cray-you're crazy, I like you.. but you're crazy.. I feel tired."
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: neutralizer
You didn't even do anything illegal. Damn people with too much time on their hands.
How is trapping, drugging and releasing a wild animal next to the pool NOT cruelty to animals? I hope the asshole burns!
Originally posted by: JImmyK
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: neutralizer
You didn't even do anything illegal. Damn people with too much time on their hands.
How is trapping, drugging and releasing a wild animal next to the pool NOT cruelty to animals? I hope the asshole burns!
Dude your an asshat, Im so glad tygrve owned you that time, you so deserved it, I hope your not such a big ahole in real life. Go get a life and stop being an e-Prick.
Originally posted by: flexy
Originally posted by: JasonSix78
Wow, some of you people are so passionate about animals, yet, when it comes to the well being of humans you could care less. It's sad really. I wish you people would use some of that passion to actually do something beneficial to society.
-Jason
its not a big step from torturing and killing animals to doing the same with people. I've seen people booting small dogs (and at the end killing it) and laughing and have seen/heard of people killing cats, dogs, skunks whatseover and LAUGH about it.
Who do you think has more "psycho"-potential ? Someone who kills animals and gives a sh*t and think it's funny - or someone who cares ?
Originally posted by: BrokenVisage
Originally posted by: labgeek
Originally posted by: Nik
That's not contributing to the discussion. Would you like to try again.
Sure Nik... whatever you say. My pointing out the errors in your logic or inability/unwillingness to understand simple sentences that refute your own argument isn't contributing... Hmm... :roll:
I'll try again, but as I'll use some logic and point to specifics I doubt we'll get anywhere.
Yours
1st post = meaningless nef with nothing substantial
2nd post = insult to OP calling them "the weakestlink"
3rd post = insult again to OP - "fscking douche bag" this time
4th post = calling someone an "idiot"
Mine
1st post = quotes from the OP's other thread with who might have turned them in (something others were asking)
2nd = is sleeping pills really cruelty - point for discussion re: painless method of death
3rd = pointing out that you are selective in your reading skills leaving out pertinent pieces because it suits you
4th = showing how you conviently misread and assumed points not made. And where your "advice" contradicts California law.