Today, I leave anandtech.

[Anubis]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: rbrandon

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: neutralizer

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Exactly, and like I said the line was crossed when he abused the skunk for his pleasure. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn?t have let it go. You all saying he can use any means necessary to get rid of the skunk is silly. Then some sick farmer would rape the goat every night and say he was harassing it to get it to leave.

Bestiality isn't a legal method. Sorry.

That is what i've been trying to get across to you all, there are methods that aren't legal. I asked for the law on that around pg 4 and someone gave me the definition of take

His method was completely legal. What's your point?

How do you know? The fact is he did it for his enjoyment. If he was worried about getting sprayed he wouldn't have been out there feeding it. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn't have been playing with it and wouldn't have let it go.

where did he say hge enjoyed it? maybe its me, maybe i missed the part where he kicked back with a few cold ones to watch this

If he wasn't doing it for his pleasure, he just would have been done with it and left it alone. He wouldn't have toyed with it.

where did he toy with it?

 

[Phoenix86]

Hey folks you know what?

The proof is in the pudding.

If there wasn't a problem, why did the authorities show up at the OPs house?

edit: keep in mind, supposedly the reason they took action was the OPs thread. If he didn't admit to anything illegal, why'd they show up?

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Originally posted by: tami

Originally posted by: Phoenix86
OK, everyone defending the OP.

Why do you think they mehod he used to get rid of the pest is humane? For the record, in the original thread he said he gave it 4 or so different pills, and about 3-5 of each, then he released it next to a pool, where it drown to death. I don't know WTF actually happened, but that's what was said in the thread that supposedly got reported.

How is that method humane?

thank you, but i read the original thread. i didn't need your narrative.

Thank you, but obviously a lot of others didn't.

This wasn't directed to you specificaly, since you did read it.

Also, the OP has edited his posts in the original thread to contain nothing, so some people are confused. I read the original thread when it was created, so I was recapping. If it didn't help you move on, OK?

No one needed your useless reply.

If he's so innocent, why'd he edit his posts? Face it. He got caught being a jerk to a skunk that wasn't a threat at all. Someone turned him in. The authorities will make their investigation. If they can prove he did something criminal, he'll be arrested for it. If they can't, it's case closed.

 

[AMDZen]

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: rbrandon

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: neutralizer

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Exactly, and like I said the line was crossed when he abused the skunk for his pleasure. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn?t have let it go. You all saying he can use any means necessary to get rid of the skunk is silly. Then some sick farmer would rape the goat every night and say he was harassing it to get it to leave.

Bestiality isn't a legal method. Sorry.

That is what i've been trying to get across to you all, there are methods that aren't legal. I asked for the law on that around pg 4 and someone gave me the definition of take

His method was completely legal. What's your point?

How do you know? The fact is he did it for his enjoyment. If he was worried about getting sprayed he wouldn't have been out there feeding it. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn't have been playing with it and wouldn't have let it go.

where did he say hge enjoyed it? maybe its me, maybe i missed the part where he kicked back with a few cold ones to watch this

i missed that also

all i see is HBalzer and Nik compairing the size of the douche required to clean their monstorous vag

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

I can't believe their still arguing. The same points over and over too.

This thread represents more then enough reason for someone to leave this forum, I'm debating it myself after wasting time reading some of it. I just think Nik or HBalzer should admit to being the loser with no life who called the cops over something so frivilous and let the thread die already. But that would be asking too much, sure lock the threads with beautiful naked women contained there in, and send the poster on vacation. But when a thread gets out of control like this its all well and good, even though it represents the worst that this forum has to offer.

BTW I think locking naked women threads is only appropriate if "NSFW" isn't posted boldly for anyone to see. I'm all fine with it as long as its noted so if someone is at work it would be there own fault. This forum is becomming exactly like everything else that is wrong with this country. Well not exactly, but still sex and nudity is wrong before anything else. Its more offensive then everything else. Thats just my own rant there, has nothing to do with the topic at hand. But talking about naked womens is more interesting to me.

 

[Siva]

Kudos to the OP for a smart idea for killing the skunk, I will remember this if I ever have a problem with one again. Where I live (suburbs) we are on the edge of some dense woods and occassionally have a skunk wander around during the day. Its a big pain and animal control always puts the animal down. A skunk poses a threat to the kids playing, local pets, and our sense of smell. If you can deal with a skunk on your own, all the better, saves animal control a trip and saves taxpayer money. Shooting/chopping head off is dangerous because the skunk is liable to spray. It will most certainly be killed by animal control anyway in a way that is no more humane than what the OP did. Every animal that is suspected of having rabies (aside from domesticated pets) is put down then tested.

Whoever reported this to the police should be ashamed of him/herself. This was not illegal. You wasted the police officers' time and you worried the OP over something that did nothing more than offend your own beliefs. You should not act so rashly on what is nothing more than self-righteous anger and a power trip. Behavior like that is immature and antisocial. Why not call the police on one of the many members under 21 who posts about drinking in that case, that's more illegal than what the op did? I know I'd be in trouble.

Oh as for wasserkool's banning, that's nuts. If what he said was so bad, Nik should be banned about 42,000 times over and I should probably be banned once or twice myself along with most other active participants on ATOT. The mods must be smoking some fine cheeba to let Nik go on the tirades that he does and still pretend that there are actual rules to this forum. I realize being a mod is a volunteer thing and you are doing this forum a service and for the most part I thank the mods, but sometimes you guys just suck.

 

[novasatori]

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Thank you, but obviously a lot of others didn't.

This wasn't directed to you specificaly, since you did read it.

Also, the OP has edited his posts in the original thread to contain nothing, so some people are confused. I read the original thread when it was created, so I was recapping. If it didn't help you move on, OK?

No one needed your useless reply.

You obviously missed the part where he said it must have been alive since it had left the premises by the next morning, since you say where it drown to death.

 

[Gunslinger08]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: rbrandon

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: neutralizer

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Exactly, and like I said the line was crossed when he abused the skunk for his pleasure. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn?t have let it go. You all saying he can use any means necessary to get rid of the skunk is silly. Then some sick farmer would rape the goat every night and say he was harassing it to get it to leave.

Bestiality isn't a legal method. Sorry.

That is what i've been trying to get across to you all, there are methods that aren't legal. I asked for the law on that around pg 4 and someone gave me the definition of take

His method was completely legal. What's your point?

How do you know? The fact is he did it for his enjoyment. If he was worried about getting sprayed he wouldn't have been out there feeding it. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn't have been playing with it and wouldn't have let it go.

where did he say hge enjoyed it? maybe its me, maybe i missed the part where he kicked back with a few cold ones to watch this

If he wasn't doing it for his pleasure, he just would have been done with it and left it alone. He wouldn't have toyed with it.

Because, as this thread has shown, everyone clearly thinks exactly like you.

 

[amoeba]

we need a new acronym

TPAD

take pills and drown.

 

[BudAshes]

Originally posted by: Anubis

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: rbrandon

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: neutralizer

Originally posted by: HBalzer

Originally posted by: mwtgg

Originally posted by: HBalzer
Exactly, and like I said the line was crossed when he abused the skunk for his pleasure. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn?t have let it go. You all saying he can use any means necessary to get rid of the skunk is silly. Then some sick farmer would rape the goat every night and say he was harassing it to get it to leave.

Bestiality isn't a legal method. Sorry.

That is what i've been trying to get across to you all, there are methods that aren't legal. I asked for the law on that around pg 4 and someone gave me the definition of take

His method was completely legal. What's your point?

How do you know? The fact is he did it for his enjoyment. If he was worried about getting sprayed he wouldn't have been out there feeding it. If he felt it was a threat he wouldn't have been playing with it and wouldn't have let it go.

where did he say hge enjoyed it? maybe its me, maybe i missed the part where he kicked back with a few cold ones to watch this

If he wasn't doing it for his pleasure, he just would have been done with it and left it alone. He wouldn't have toyed with it.

where did he toy with it?

when he had sex with it, duh.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: Anubis
where did he toy with it?

Well he obviously took his sweet time and didn't finish the job.

 

[BudAshes]

Originally posted by: Nik

Originally posted by: Anubis
where did he toy with it?

Well he obviously took his sweet time and didn't finish the job.

yeah its never right to leave a lady hanging

 

[Siva]

Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Hey folks you know what?

The proof is in the pudding.

If there wasn't a problem, why did the authorities show up at the OPs house?

edit: keep in mind, supposedly the reason they took action was the OPs thread. If he didn't admit to anything illegal, why'd they show up?

I think it is the responsibility of the police to follow up on the report. I am sure once they saw that the OPs house wasn't filled with 90 starving cats they realized that there was no real animal absue going on. The proof is in the REAL pudding, and that is a court case. If this ever went to court, a good lawyer would have it dismissed before you could say "mmmmmmm sleeping pills".

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: novasatori

Originally posted by: Phoenix86

Thank you, but obviously a lot of others didn't.

This wasn't directed to you specificaly, since you did read it.

Also, the OP has edited his posts in the original thread to contain nothing, so some people are confused. I read the original thread when it was created, so I was recapping. If it didn't help you move on, OK?

No one needed your useless reply.

You obviously missed the part where he said it must have been alive since it had left the premises by the next morning, since you say where it drown to death.

You obviously missed the point where it doesn't matter what happened. He's being held to what he said. He could have been reported BEFORE he posted the next day that it was gone. What actually happened is irrelevant to the fact that he got reported. He was reported for what he said happen, not what actually happened.

 

[ArmenK]

Nik, I don't know what you have against me but here are some details to clear up some questions you may have.

The skunk was caught in a trap that was put out for racoons. We have a family of racoons in the area that have ENTERED our house and taken food. Once the skunk was trapped, I attempted to release but could not because it would threaten to spray when I would start to open the door of the cage. You have to understand that the cage door is not easy to open, it takes a bit of force and you need to stick your fingers into the cage basically to open it. After giving it the pills, I opened the door to the cage and quickly went back inside so that it would not spray me. I watched it walk out and go around the corner of the house. From there, it walked about 50 feet to the pool (I could not see it at this point). I walked to the other side of the house (insifde) and saw movement in the pool (outside) so I went out there, got the net, and pulled it out. It was struggling to breath at this point and I assumed it was dead or going to die. I left it there so that I could get rid of the body the next morning. In the morning, the it was gone.

If you think I intentionally put it in the pool or wanted to go there, you are mistaken. I will not sit here and try to convince you but this is what happened.

 

[fbrdphreak]

Originally posted by: CVSiN
and we care why?

bye bye.... dont let the door hit ya...

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: Siva

Originally posted by: Phoenix86
Hey folks you know what?

The proof is in the pudding.

If there wasn't a problem, why did the authorities show up at the OPs house?

edit: keep in mind, supposedly the reason they took action was the OPs thread. If he didn't admit to anything illegal, why'd they show up?

I think it is the responsibility of the police to follow up on the report. I am sure once they saw that the OPs house wasn't filled with 90 starving cats they realized that there was no real animal absue going on. The proof is in the REAL pudding, and that is a court case. If this ever went to court, a good lawyer would have it dismissed before you could say "mmmmmmm sleeping pills".

Cops don't follow up on every report they get. They obviously thought there may have been criminal activities, meaning he *might* have broken the law.

edit: no that's not the REAL proof, there may not be enough evidence that a crime happened, that doesn't mean it didn't happen.

 

[TheNinja]

it was nice to know you

 

[Phoenix86]

Originally posted by: ArmenK
Nik, I don't know what you have against me but here are some details to clear up some questions you may have.

The skunk was caught in a trap that was put out for racoons. We have a family of racoons in the area that have ENTERED our house and taken food. Once the skunk was trapped, I attempted to release but could not because it would threaten to spray when I would start to open the door of the cage. You have to understand that the cage door is not easy to open, it takes a bit of force and you need to stick your fingers into the cage basically to open it. After giving it the pills, I opened the door to the cage and quickly went back inside so that it would not spray me. I watched it walk out and go around the corner of the house. From there, it walked about 50 feet to the pool (I could not see it at this point). I walked to the other side of the house (insifde) and saw movement in the pool (outside) so I went out there, got the net, and pulled it out. It was struggling to breath at this point and I assumed it was dead or going to die. I left it there so that I could get rid of the body the next morning. In the morning, the it was gone.

If you think I intentionally put it in the pool or wanted to go there, you are mistaken. I will not sit here and try to convince you but this is what happened.

How old are you?

 

[captains]

Originally posted by: amoeba
we need a new acronym

TPAD

take pills and drown.

 

[MisfitsFiend]

Nik, I don't know what you have against me but here are some details to clear up some questions you may have.

The skunk was caught in a trap that was put out for racoons. We have a family of racoons in the area that have ENTERED our house and taken food. Once the skunk was trapped, I attempted to release but could not because it would threaten to spray when I would start to open the door of the cage. You have to understand that the cage door is not easy to open, it takes a bit of force and you need to stick your fingers into the cage basically to open it. After giving it the pills, I opened the door to the cage and quickly went back inside so that it would not spray me. I watched it walk out and go around the corner of the house. From there, it walked about 50 feet to the pool (I could not see it at this point). I walked to the other side of the house (insifde) and saw movement in the pool (outside) so I went out there, got the net, and pulled it out. It was struggling to breath at this point and I assumed it was dead or going to die. I left it there so that I could get rid of the body the next morning. In the morning, the it was gone.

If you think I intentionally put it in the pool or wanted to go there, you are mistaken. I will not sit here and try to convince you but this is what happened.

ArmenK, don't let the numb nuts here get you upset - it's not worth it!

 

[BudAshes]

you know whats funny, is that the skunk probably didnt even die. He actually saved the skunk, and went through alot of extra effort to do so. Next time just set it on fire and take pics, thats what atot really wants.

 

[NikPreviousAcct]

Originally posted by: ArmenK
Nik, I don't know what you have against me but here are some details to clear up some questions you may have.

The skunk was caught in a trap that was put out for racoons. We have a family of racoons in the area that have ENTERED our house and taken food. Once the skunk was trapped, I attempted to release but could not because it would threaten to spray when I would start to open the door of the cage. You have to understand that the cage door is not easy to open, it takes a bit of force and you need to stick your fingers into the cage basically to open it. After giving it the pills, I opened the door to the cage and quickly went back inside so that it would not spray me. I watched it walk out and go around the corner of the house. From there, it walked about 50 feet to the pool (I could not see it at this point). I walked to the other side of the house (insifde) and saw movement in the pool (outside) so I went out there, got the net, and pulled it out. It was struggling to breath at this point and I assumed it was dead or going to die. I left it there so that I could get rid of the body the next morning. In the morning, the it was gone.

If you think I intentionally put it in the pool or wanted to go there, you are mistaken. I will not sit here and try to convince you but this is what happened.

So you were too scared to get close to the cage to let it loose, but you had the balls to get close enough to it to feed it pills?

Sh|t just don't add up, mang.

 

[junkerman123]

I recommend that everyone who has posted in this thread be banned one week for every post.

 

[novasatori]

Originally posted by: Phoenix86
You obviously missed the point where it doesn't matter what happened. He's being held to what he said. He could have been reported BEFORE he posted the next day that it was gone. What actually happened is irrelevant to the fact that he got reported. He was reported for what he said happen, not what actually happened.

Oh so wait, you only look at 90% of a persons post history to figure out what they said not 100%?

You just take what you need out of context in order to make them guilty?

because he did in fact SAY that it left the next morning, he also said he thought it drowned but corrected that.

So if we arent going to count the part where he said it left, I don't think we can count the part where he said it drowned, seems a bit unfair and selective imo.

 

[squirrel dog]

How in the hayell did you get a skunk to take pills ??I have two dogs and a cat and I cant get them to take any kind of pill . I put it in cheese,they eat the cheese,spit put the pill .