Top athletes don't ride bicycles

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous
pffft......you know Belgians are crappy cyclists.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Here is the line in the arguments.

The people defending Lance bring up his physical conditioning. What his body can do and how can he push the limits of his own body to complete something that very few people can do.

The people against Lance bring up skills that are required per sport as well as conditioning. Being required to have hand eye coordination, being able to catch, jump, spin, kick, etc.

To combine the 2, the best athlete would have to have superhuman physique (right word?) to be able to withstand grueling tasks and also have an extremely broad range of skills that can be executed very well.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

Are you a professional athlete already? I didn't think so. Let me know when you are a top NFL running back and then we will work from there.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

Are you a professional athlete already? I didn't think so. Let me know when you are a top NFL running back and then we will work from there.


OK - I'll PM you when I'm at that level

watch for freegeeks in the NFL
 

Jzero

Lifer
Oct 10, 1999
18,834
1
0
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

Are you a professional athlete already? I didn't think so. Let me know when you are a top NFL running back and then we will work from there.


OK - I'll PM you when I'm at that level

watch for freegeeks in the NFL

George Plimpton pulled it off, and so can you.
 

ThePresence

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2001
27,727
16
81
Originally posted by: skace
Here is the line in the arguments.

The people defending Lance bring up his physical conditioning. What his body can do and how can he push the limits of his own body to complete something that very few people can do.

The people against Lance bring up skills that are required per sport as well as conditioning. Being required to have hand eye coordination, being able to catch, jump, spin, kick, etc.

To combine the 2, the best athlete would have to have superhuman physique (right word?) to be able to withstand grueling tasks and also have an extremely broad range of skills that can be executed very well.

Actually, it would be impossible. To be a good football player, you need a certain type of body and physique. To be top cyclist requires a completely different type of body. The same person could never be a top player in each area.
 

skace

Lifer
Jan 23, 2001
14,488
7
81
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Actually, it would be impossible. To be a good football player, you need a certain type of body and physique. To be top cyclist requires a completely different type of body. The same person could never be a top player in each area.

Well, I meant more in general. Cycling and Football are kind of at ends. But if there was, say, a soccer player who had insane resting heart rate / all that crap and was able to dunk a basketball, bike in a regular race and play decent baseball. I think that would be the true display of athleticism.

Edit: By dunk a basketball, I meant he could hang with the pros...
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: skace
Here is the line in the arguments.

The people defending Lance bring up his physical conditioning. What his body can do and how can he push the limits of his own body to complete something that very few people can do.

The people against Lance bring up skills that are required per sport as well as conditioning. Being required to have hand eye coordination, being able to catch, jump, spin, kick, etc.

To combine the 2, the best athlete would have to have superhuman physique (right word?) to be able to withstand grueling tasks and also have an extremely broad range of skills that can be executed very well.

Actually, it would be impossible. To be a good football player, you need a certain type of body and physique. To be top cyclist requires a completely different type of body. The same person could never be a top player in each area.
An exception would be if the guy were a track (velodrome) sprinter. They're massive compared to other cyclists as their event is only 1km and they usually only go all-out in the last 200m or so. The mass is necessary for the explosive power they need (and doesn't slow them down since there aren't hills on velodromes).
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
This guy has OBVIOUSLY never seen a professional bike racer as many of you obviously haven't either judging by your posts. I dated a girl whose dad was on one of the #1 US biking teams in the world, knows Lance, and carried the Olympic torch. The guy is freaking huge. He bikes miles every day and mountain climbs and he's one of the most massive men I have ever met. He's as much of a "guy" as any jock I have ever come into contact with. Lance may be thin but he fscking survived cancer for Christ's sake, of course he's thin. However, if you saw him in real life I bet he's a lot more muscular tan you think. All of these biker guys have pretty impressive ammounts of muscle and I bet they could out squat most any NFL athlete in the business, just like in highschool the football guys would be leg pressing for 300 while us cross country guys would be hitting it close to 500lbs.
Ahahahah. That is the funniest thing I've read in awhile... the heavier you lift or faster you can sprint, the more fast twitch fibers you will have... Lance doesn't need fast twitch fibers because he primarily needs endurance. Look at the build between a X country and sprinter, much different. It is highly doubtful that a X country runner could outsquat a football player (maybe in high school but doubtful in college), of course there are exceptions.

For example, the FB the Eagles just drafted, Thomas Topeh, is 6-1 245. He squats 630lbs, and runs a 4.81 40 which is good for a FB. Name me many cyclist who can squat that much and still run a 4.81 40...
Barry Sanders (I read in SI) could squat even more than this guy! But what do you expect when you have big lineman like Larry Allen squatting 900lbs!!
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

It doesn't seem so hard... I'll be your wingman in 2005 but it's my turn to win the year after
 

Lazy8s

Golden Member
Jun 23, 2004
1,503
0
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
This guy has OBVIOUSLY never seen a professional bike racer as many of you obviously haven't either judging by your posts. I dated a girl whose dad was on one of the #1 US biking teams in the world, knows Lance, and carried the Olympic torch. The guy is freaking huge. He bikes miles every day and mountain climbs and he's one of the most massive men I have ever met. He's as much of a "guy" as any jock I have ever come into contact with. Lance may be thin but he fscking survived cancer for Christ's sake, of course he's thin. However, if you saw him in real life I bet he's a lot more muscular tan you think. All of these biker guys have pretty impressive ammounts of muscle and I bet they could out squat most any NFL athlete in the business, just like in highschool the football guys would be leg pressing for 300 while us cross country guys would be hitting it close to 500lbs.
Ahahahah. That is the funniest thing I've read in awhile... the heavier you lift or faster you can sprint, the more fast twitch fibers you will have... Lance doesn't need fast twitch fibers because he primarily needs endurance. Look at the build between a X country and sprinter, much different. It is highly doubtful that a X country runner could outsquat a football player (maybe in high school but doubtful in college), of course there are exceptions.

For example, the FB the Eagles just drafted, Thomas Topeh, is 6-1 245. He squats 630lbs, and runs a 4.81 40 which is good for a FB. Name me many cyclist who can squat that much and still run a 4.81 40...


You don't know many college CC runners do you? Most of our CC team played football or wreastled. We were a bunch of 6' 200lb. guys that ran in the off season. Why? Oh yeah that's right because running was better leg training than any other training I have ever seen. I bet Lance's legs are huge, even compared to most football players'.
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

It doesn't seem so hard... I'll be your wingman in 2005 but it's my turn to win the year after


deal - after my TdF victory I'm going back to the NFL to win my 2nd Super Bowl

(and you don't touch Sheryl because she's mine)
 

maziwanka

Lifer
Jul 4, 2000
10,415
1
0
lance armstrong is definately an incredible athlete - winning the TdF 6 consecutive times is no joke...

an interesting question is whether you believe it would be harder to become the top cyclist in the world or the top nfl/soccer/basketball/baseball player in the world? personally, i can't answer that question....
 

jjones

Lifer
Oct 9, 2001
15,424
2
0
I don't see what's wrong with the article. He's arguing against the idea that Armstrong is the world's greatest athlete. I'd have to agree with him.
 

3chordcharlie

Diamond Member
Mar 30, 2004
9,859
1
81
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: 3chordcharlie
Originally posted by: freegeeks
some people in this thread have convinced me - cycling is easy

I'm going to train for a year, win the TdF next summer and earn $15 million like the Boss

Lance has no chance next year

I'm writing HR right now to tell them they can shove it because I'm going to be a pro-cyclist from now :thumbsup:

thx everyone for his input :thumbsup: I'm going to be rich and famous

It doesn't seem so hard... I'll be your wingman in 2005 but it's my turn to win the year after
deal - after my TdF victory I'm going back to the NFL to win my 2nd Super Bowl

(and you don't touch Sheryl because she's mine)

well, I guess I'll have to make that sacrifice. A few hours of training and no Sheryl Crow... winning hardly seems worth the effort!
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: jjones
I don't see what's wrong with the article. He's arguing against the idea that Armstrong is the world's greatest athlete. I'd have to agree with him.

and he's also arguing that a RB in form or Dennis Rodman can win the TdF
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: Fausto
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: CChaos
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
...but he is probably right in saying that X % of football players COULD win the Tour if they dedicated their life to it like Lance did, but that Lance does not meet the requirements for the NFL...

What he said was ANY NFL running back is a better athlete than Armstrong. So, ANY NFL running back "if they dedicated their life to it like Lance did" would win 7 Tours? Are you seriously standing behind that statement?

Also, why do the running backs get to dedicate thier lives to cycling, but Lance has to meet the requirements as is? Oh, because you're just a biased as this jackass? Ok.
If Lance dedicated his life to the NFL, no way in hell he would make it. Are you that retarded, or did the rest of your missing IQ drip down the side of your dad's leg? Where did I say that ANY NFL RB could beat Armstrong in the Tour? I said X% of RB's, if they dedicated their lives, could definitely beat Lance... there's a reason why they earn millions of $ and it's not just to do Gatorade commercials.
Actually, I seriously doubt you're right here. Not to dismiss the abilities of NFL RB's, but you have to look at the big picture with regard to cycling. The Tour is above and beyond the abilities of 99% of the pro cyclists out there right now, so the odds of finding an RB with the genetic potential to reach that level are pretty slim. You'd also have to get them as kids prior to even becoming a football player as they're all way, way too heavy to climb hills like Lance and company.

Distance cycling ranked 20th in ESPN's toughest sport. Football 3rd. Hell, RODEO: STEER WRESTLING and FIGURE SKATING finished above Distance cycling. Anyone with half an IQ could tell you that football is a tougher sport, you don't even need this article.
Apples and oranges. Cyclists obviously couldn't complete a triple lutz if their lives depended on it, but as far as the "suffer-factor" goes, I don't think they have anyone in the same category. 100 miles on a bike is pretty difficult. 100 miles on a bike at race pace is very difficult. 100 miles at race pace with 15,000 vertical feet of climbing would kill most people. TdF riders do some variation of 100 at race pace every day for three weeks. You have no idea how mentally and physically tough you have to be to complete a race like this, much less win it.

Bike racing, while seemingly simple (you just ride the bike, right?) is really, really tough. Even an amateur racer like me has some idea of what the Tour riders go through.
I agree with you, cycling is really tough, and don't want to take anything away from Lance because he is a great athlete. But I disagree in the sense that football players are just as mentally tough, look at Ray Lewis or Ronnie Lott (when he played), as well as Jerry Rice. These guys never lose their intensity, even on practice days. Many people say that Ricky Williams quit because he wasn't mentally tough enough, although he had more than enough of the physical tools to be successful.

Also, I think there would be a good chance that someone from the NFL (whether it be CB's, Safeties, RB's/FB's, or Linebackers) could achieve the level of endurance that Lance has achieved. These are guys who have to be faster and stronger than the best in the world as well (the NFL is globally the cream of crop for "football" as is the Tour), so I wouldn't be surprised if someone could achieve higher than Lance's resting heartrate of 32-34 or VOP levels (of course it's just purely theoretical since they would have to start cycling training at a young age).
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: jjones
I don't see what's wrong with the article. He's arguing against the idea that Armstrong is the world's greatest athlete. I'd have to agree with him.
It's really not the premise that's flawed, it's how he goes about arguing his point.

Wayne Gretzky was skinny enough in his prime to win the Tour de France.
Bullshit. Not only was he not thin enough, he wasn't light enough, and who can even speculate about his aerobic capacity?

Dennis Rodman could have if it wouldn't have bored him to death. Alex Rodriguez would have if there were more money in it.
Stupid and pointless.

Back to Williams, the point being anybody who ever carried the football once in the NFL is a better athlete than even cycling's best ever.

Put it this way: Williams could peddle a bicycle for a couple hours in the Tour de France but Armstrong couldn't survive a single hit in the NFL.
Wrong. The author is forgetting how fast TdF riders are going most of the time. Even an decent amateur like me would get his doors blown off inside of 20km.

Look at the first stage of the tour this year; 202.5km completed in 4:40

That's roughly 120 miles at 27 miles per hour. Hell, even the final stage (in which the riders pretty much goof off prior to the final sprint in Paris) had an average speed of amost 25mph....and that's after three weeks of racing.

I could go on, but you hopefully get my point; the author is just being "controversial" for the sake of getting ink.......just like the previous idiots who've written similar bits.
 

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: gigapet
whats your point?


^^

pretty much sums it up

You don't get it so why post?



:roll:

did you you read that article -

basically Lance is not a top athlete because he sits on a bike :roll:

:roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:
yes i did read the article....unfortunately it was pretty dumb and i feel worse for having done so....do I agree that ricky is a better athlete than lance yes, do i aggree that lance is an athlete yes.......does riding a bike make you gay ---yes

Wow, you are prolly very close to being banned right now...
FreeGeeks, thanks for the article, I am going to write him a nasty email:
His email

Lets all tell the guy that he should quit...
 

freegeeks

Diamond Member
May 7, 2001
5,460
1
81
Originally posted by: adlep
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: gigapet
Originally posted by: freegeeks
Originally posted by: gigapet
whats your point?


^^

pretty much sums it up

You don't get it so why post?



:roll:

did you you read that article -

basically Lance is not a top athlete because he sits on a bike :roll:

:roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll::roll:
yes i did read the article....unfortunately it was pretty dumb and i feel worse for having done so....do I agree that ricky is a better athlete than lance yes, do i aggree that lance is an athlete yes.......does riding a bike make you gay ---yes

Wow, you are prolly very close to being banned right now...
FreeGeeks, thanks for the article, I am going to write him a nasty email:
His email

Lets all tell the guy that he should quit...

hehe

I got the article from a triathlon forum and the people there were already sending emails to that sob



:thumbsup:
 

Fausto

Elite Member
Nov 29, 2000
26,521
2
0
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Fausto
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: CChaos
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
...but he is probably right in saying that X % of football players COULD win the Tour if they dedicated their life to it like Lance did, but that Lance does not meet the requirements for the NFL...

What he said was ANY NFL running back is a better athlete than Armstrong. So, ANY NFL running back "if they dedicated their life to it like Lance did" would win 7 Tours? Are you seriously standing behind that statement?

Also, why do the running backs get to dedicate thier lives to cycling, but Lance has to meet the requirements as is? Oh, because you're just a biased as this jackass? Ok.
If Lance dedicated his life to the NFL, no way in hell he would make it. Are you that retarded, or did the rest of your missing IQ drip down the side of your dad's leg? Where did I say that ANY NFL RB could beat Armstrong in the Tour? I said X% of RB's, if they dedicated their lives, could definitely beat Lance... there's a reason why they earn millions of $ and it's not just to do Gatorade commercials.
Actually, I seriously doubt you're right here. Not to dismiss the abilities of NFL RB's, but you have to look at the big picture with regard to cycling. The Tour is above and beyond the abilities of 99% of the pro cyclists out there right now, so the odds of finding an RB with the genetic potential to reach that level are pretty slim. You'd also have to get them as kids prior to even becoming a football player as they're all way, way too heavy to climb hills like Lance and company.

Distance cycling ranked 20th in ESPN's toughest sport. Football 3rd. Hell, RODEO: STEER WRESTLING and FIGURE SKATING finished above Distance cycling. Anyone with half an IQ could tell you that football is a tougher sport, you don't even need this article.
Apples and oranges. Cyclists obviously couldn't complete a triple lutz if their lives depended on it, but as far as the "suffer-factor" goes, I don't think they have anyone in the same category. 100 miles on a bike is pretty difficult. 100 miles on a bike at race pace is very difficult. 100 miles at race pace with 15,000 vertical feet of climbing would kill most people. TdF riders do some variation of 100 at race pace every day for three weeks. You have no idea how mentally and physically tough you have to be to complete a race like this, much less win it.

Bike racing, while seemingly simple (you just ride the bike, right?) is really, really tough. Even an amateur racer like me has some idea of what the Tour riders go through.
I agree with you, cycling is really tough, and don't want to take anything away from Lance because he is a great athlete. But I disagree in the sense that football players are just as mentally tough, look at Ray Lewis or Ronnie Lott (when he played), as well as Jerry Rice. These guys never lose their intensity, even on practice days. Many people say that Ricky Williams quit because he wasn't mentally tough enough, although he had more than enough of the physical tools to be successful.
I basically agree with you here, but again there's a difference in the type of toughness required. Football is about maintaining focus from play to play whereas cycling doesn't let up until you hit the finish line. It's like standing up to a series of explosions vs having a blowtorch applied to your legs and lungs for 5 hours.

Practice is similar though; you have to make yourself suffer on a daily basis in order to win when it counts. I'm not sure I could put in the hours Lance does even if I had someone paying me to do so.

Also, I think there would be a good chance that someone from the NFL (whether it be CB's, Safeties, RB's/FB's, or Linebackers) could achieve the level of endurance that Lance has achieved. These are guys who have to be faster and stronger than the best in the world as well (the NFL is globally the cream of crop for "football" as is the Tour), so I wouldn't be surprised if someone could achieve higher than Lance's resting heartrate of 32-34 or VOP levels (of course it's just purely theoretical since they would have to start cycling training at a young age).
<shrug> It's certainly possible, but the only issue is body type. Cyclists are really small for the most part; if you're much over 170lbs, you're not going to win the Tour as your power to weight ratio will suck compared to the other contenders. I'm not sure someone who has the genetic potential to be an NFLer could ever be light enough (even if you got them as a kid) to compete in the Tour.
 

mobobuff

Lifer
Apr 5, 2004
11,099
1
81
Well, I've never seen Lance Armstrong lay out on the ground holding his ankle and whining while a crew of medical assistants and coaches rushes over to him. No, if I remember correctly, he went through having a metal crossbar rammed into his crotch during a crash and many other serious injuries, only to pick his bike up, get back on it and ride it like a friggin' demon the rest of the way across the finish line while the whole time his back brakes were locked.

The author of the article is a fvcktard.
 

SP33Demon

Lifer
Jun 22, 2001
27,928
142
106
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
Originally posted by: SP33Demon
Originally posted by: Lazy8s
This guy has OBVIOUSLY never seen a professional bike racer as many of you obviously haven't either judging by your posts. I dated a girl whose dad was on one of the #1 US biking teams in the world, knows Lance, and carried the Olympic torch. The guy is freaking huge. He bikes miles every day and mountain climbs and he's one of the most massive men I have ever met. He's as much of a "guy" as any jock I have ever come into contact with. Lance may be thin but he fscking survived cancer for Christ's sake, of course he's thin. However, if you saw him in real life I bet he's a lot more muscular tan you think. All of these biker guys have pretty impressive ammounts of muscle and I bet they could out squat most any NFL athlete in the business, just like in highschool the football guys would be leg pressing for 300 while us cross country guys would be hitting it close to 500lbs.
Ahahahah. That is the funniest thing I've read in awhile... the heavier you lift or faster you can sprint, the more fast twitch fibers you will have... Lance doesn't need fast twitch fibers because he primarily needs endurance. Look at the build between a X country and sprinter, much different. It is highly doubtful that a X country runner could outsquat a football player (maybe in high school but doubtful in college), of course there are exceptions.

For example, the FB the Eagles just drafted, Thomas Topeh, is 6-1 245. He squats 630lbs, and runs a 4.81 40 which is good for a FB. Name me many cyclist who can squat that much and still run a 4.81 40...


You don't know many college CC runners do you? Most of our CC team played football or wreastled. We were a bunch of 6' 200lb. guys that ran in the off season. Why? Oh yeah that's right because running was better leg training than any other training I have ever seen. I bet Lance's legs are huge, even compared to most football players'.
You're talking about HIGH SCHOOL. Of course in high school you could easily do 3 sports, and basketweave on the side.

How many of these kids got a scholarship, played in college, and then went pro? How many of your X Country/wrestler/football high school buddies could squat 630 (slightly above the average for Fullbacks who make the NFL) and ran a 4.8 40? Again, that was just a random sample of a FB drafted from the Eagles. I'm sure many are even better than this, for example Barry Sanders could squat almost 900 lbs. Do you know how insane that is? The man was only 5-7. Tell me how many of your high school buddies could squat 900, brush off a lineman who also squats 900, cut on a dime, and then outrun a secondary (which consists of players who run 4.2/4.3 40's) in one play? This ain't high school son, we're talking about the cream of the crop. Anyone that tells you a pro X Country runner can outsquat an NFL player is full of sht (of course there are few exceptions). Anyone who tells you Lance Armstrong can outsquat an NFL player is full of sht as well (he can probably do more than 1-5% I'm willing to bet, there are some smaller RB/TB's who are skinny/small/fast).
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |