Trek Against Trump

[Perknose]

Lololololololololol!

Trek Against Trump
September 29 at 12:00pm ·
Star Trek has always offered a positive vision of the future, a vision of hope and optimism, and most importantly, a vision of inclusion, where people of all races are accorded equal respect and dignity, where individual beliefs and lifestyles are respected so long as they pose no threat to others. We cannot turn our backs on what is happening in the upcoming election. Never has there been a presidential candidate who stands in such complete opposition to the ideals of the Star Trek universe as Donald Trump. His election would take this country backward, perhaps disastrously. We need to elect a president who will move this country forward into the kind of future we all dream of: where personal differences are understood and accepted, where science overrules superstition, where people work together instead of against each other.

The resolution of conflicts on Star Trek was never easy. Don’t remain aloof –vote! We have heard people say they will vote Green or Libertarian or not at all because the two major candidates are equally flawed. That is both illogical and inaccurate. Either Secretary Clinton or Mr. Trump will occupy the White House. One is an amateur with a contemptuous ignorance of national laws and international realities, while the other has devoted her life to public service, and has deep and valuable experience with the proven ability to work with Congress to pass desperately needed legislation. If, as some say, the government is broken, a protest vote will not fix it.

Have you just turned 18? Have you moved? Have you never voted before? Some states have early registration (early October) and/or absentee ballots. You can’t vote if you are not registered. So make it so. Go tohttps://www.rockthevote.com , a non-profit, non-partisan organization, and fulfill your civic duty. Because, damn it, you are a citizen of the USA, with an obligation to take part in our democracy! Do this not merely for yourself but for all the generations that follow. Vote for a future of enlightenment and inclusion, a future that will someday lead us to the stars.

Endorsed by:

J.J. Abrams
Allan Apone
Richard Arnold
René Auberjonois
Scott Bakula
Ira Steven Behr
Rick Berman
John Billingsley
Christopher Black
Paula Block
Paul Boehmer
André Bormanis
Brannon Braga
Mark Robert Brown
LeVar Burton
Terri Potts-Chattaway
John Cho
Tracee Cocco
George Colucci
Mimi Cozzens
Denise Crosby
Dan Curry
Joseph D'Agosta
Peter David
Nicole de Boer
Keith R.A. DeCandido
John de Lancie
Jonathan Del Arco
John DeMita
Chris Doohan
Paul Eiding
Aron Eisenberg
Terry Erdmann
Terry Farrell
Lolita Fatjo
David C. Fein
Juan Carlos Fernandez
Louise Fletcher
Jonathan Frakes
Bryan Fuller
Dave Galanter
Tim Gaskill
David Gerrold
Robert Greenberger
Bruce Greenwood
Max Grodénchik
Martha Hackett
Glenn Hauman
Manu Intiraymi
Michael Jan Friedman
Dominic Keating
John Knoll
Walter Koenig
Alex Kurtzman
Judith Levitt
Jeff Lewis
Justin Lin
David Mack
Dennis Madalone
Chase Masterson
Dakin Matthews
Gates McFadden
Robert Duncan McNeill
Nicholas Meyer
Anthony Montgomery
Ronald B. Moore
Tom Morga
Kate Mulgrew
Larry Nemecek
Adam Nimoy
Susan Nimoy
Robert O'Reilly
Linda Park
Leslie Parrish
Robb Pearlman
Simon Pegg
Randy Pflug
Ethan Phillips
Robert Picardo
Sandra Piller
Chris Pine
Emmett Plant
Zachary Quinto
Michael Reisz
Andrew Robinson
Eugene & Heidi Roddenberry
Marvin Rush
Tim Russ
Zoe Saldana
Ralph Senensky
Naren Shankar
Armin Shimerman
Gregory Smith
Brent Spiner
Rick Sternbach
Peter Sternlicht
Eric Stillwell
Jay Stobie
Sandy Stone
Carel Struycken
Marina Sirtis
Michael Sussman
Kitty Swink
George Takei
Michael Taylor
Hallie Todd Withrow
Connor Trinneer
Karl Urban
Wil Wheaton
Herman Zimmerman

^^^ I especially like this part of the above, bolding and highlighting mine:

We have heard people say they will vote Green or Libertarian or not at all because the two major candidates are equally flawed. That is both illogical and inaccurate. Either Secretary Clinton or Mr. Trump will occupy the White House. One is an amateur with a contemptuous ignorance of national laws and international realities, while the other has devoted her life to public service, and has deep and valuable experience with the proven ability to work with Congress to pass desperately needed legislation. If, as some say, the government is broken, a protest vote will not fix it.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Guess that's why you don't make fun of 400 pound guys sitting on their beds.

 

[disappoint]

I noticed they call their cause "Trek Against Trump" but not "Trek For Hillary Clinton"

 

[PJFrylar]

Shatner must be aboard the Trump train.

 

[Perknose]

I noticed they call their cause "Trek Against Trump" but not "Trek For Hillary Clinton"

With slogans, it's "Alliteration always anyway, asshole."

Did you "notice" what they said about Hillary Clinton? Here, I'll serve you notice on that yet again:

Either Secretary Clinton or Mr. Trump will occupy the White House. One is an amateur with a contemptuous ignorance of national laws and international realities, while the other has devoted her life to public service, and has deep and valuable experience with the proven ability to work with Congress to pass desperately needed legislation.

Sounds like a robust endorsement of Clinton to me.

 

[Perknose]

Shatner must be aboard the Trump train.

Or he has yet to figure out how to get on line with his fax machine or beeper.

 

[disappoint]

Hillary must have been frightened to lose against the bungling Trump to go to the trouble of rigging the first debate by colluding with Lester Holt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEvQZuo1VMo

 

[disappoint]

Did you "notice" what they said about Hillary Clinton?

Yes I did. We get it, they are for Hillary Clinton. I never posted anything to the contrary. My point was merely that their title is more anti-Trump than pro-Clinton, that's all.

With slogans, it's "Alliteration always anyway, asshole."

Now you see children, this is how not to behave.

 

[MongGrel]

Hillary must have been frightened to lose against the bungling Trump to go to the trouble of rigging the first debate by colluding with Lester Holt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEvQZuo1VMo

Hahahahahaha.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Hillary must have been frightened to lose against the bungling Trump to go to the trouble of rigging the first debate by colluding with Lester Holt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEvQZuo1VMo

Someone should be doing a case study of Trump supporters to find out why the need to resort to such desperation when faced with the reality that he just wasn't prepared and lost a debate.

It's really not that big of a deal. There's no need for elaborate conspiracies. I've lost count of how many there are about the debate. Hand signals. A TelePrompTer. A folder. An earpiece. Why would she need all of those? Just settle on one at least.

Obama got his ass handed to him in his first debate with Romney. It happens

 

[Meghan54]

Hillary must have been frightened to lose against the bungling Trump to go to the trouble of rigging the first debate by colluding with Lester Holt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEvQZuo1VMo

Now you see children, this is how not to behave.

Just wanted to put those two statements in their proper order, and remember children, disappoint just made the proper comment about his own ignorance laced conspiracy theory youtube link.

 

[disappoint]

Just wanted to put those two statements in their proper order, and remember children, disappoint just made the proper comment about his own ignorance laced conspiracy theory youtube link.

The only post laced with ignorance is yours.

 

[Meghan54]

The only post laced with ignorance is yours.

Ahhh, no, if you bothered to even watch your "scandalous" "revealing" conspiracy theory youtube buttfuck-ignorant video, the "secret signal" was delivered and over a minute elapsed between the signal and the moderator even beginning to speak. But before two words left Holt's mouth, Clinton was attacking the moment Trump quit speaking, even overtalking Holt. I doubt Clinton even heard Holt speak a single word....she just waited for Turnip to take a breath when she broke in.

Try again.

 

[disappoint]

Ahhh, no, if you bothered to even watch your "scandalous" "revealing" conspiracy theory youtube buttfuck-ignorant video, the "secret signal" was delivered and over a minute elapsed between the signal and the moderator even beginning to speak. But before two words left Holt's mouth, Clinton was attacking the moment Trump quit speaking, even overtalking Holt. I doubt Clinton even heard Holt speak a single word....she just waited for Turnip to take a breath when she broke in.

Try again.

Yes I realize it's only circumstantial evidence and that there is no certainty to that conspiracy theory.

 

[MomentsofSanity]

Yes I realize it's only circumstantial evidence and that there is no certainty to that conspiracy theory.

No, it's not circumstantial evidence. It's not any kind of evidence. It's just nonsense.

 

[disappoint]

No, it's not circumstantial evidence. It's not any kind of evidence. It's just nonsense.

Maybe so. Let's see what the children have to say about it...

...youtube buttfuck-ignorant video...

More vulgarity from the emotionally unstable immature rabble. The leadership here must be setting such a good example.

 

[Ken g6]

I dunno, maybe Trump supporters want him to start World War III, so we can get to the Trek universe after that?

 

[disappoint]

It's really not that big of a deal.

It's really not. Hillary is a shoe in. I just wanted to see what the reactions would be to that video.

 

[Meghan54]

It's really not. Hillary is a shoe in. I just wanted to see what the reactions would be to that video.

The reaction was it was a buttfuck-ignorant video. Pure and simple. And you seem to want to resemble that assessment of said video by posting it. Nice troll.

 

[feralkid]

It's really not. Hillary is a shoe in. I just wanted to see what the reactions would be to that video.

Shoo-in.


https://www.google.com/search?q=shoo-in&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

 

[Strk]

No Worf? Pfft!

 

[Starbuck1975]

I'm more interested in who will earn the coveted Game of Thrones endorsement.

Starks Against Stein

 

[ivwshane]

Maybe so. Let's see what the children have to say about it...



More vulgarity from the emotionally unstable immature rabble. The leadership here must be setting such a good example.

Uh oh! I think someone needs a safe space!

 

[Jaskalas]

Yes, if it's one thing we agree on it's that she has plenty of support among Republican Congress critters. They have similar strings.
They won't say it during an election, but they can work together afterwards.
Problem is if you really want what that sort of bipartisanship has to offer.

 

[HamburgerBoy]

Trump is more flawed than Clinton. Still not voting for her. Suck it.