I stand by the idea that until we know what facts/applicable laws Bragg is using it's very hard to know how solid the case is.Breakdown and analysis of the charges (by criminal defense lawyer, Bruce Rivers) and how things will likely unfold in the trial. Summation, Bragg has an easy case to prove vs Trump.
What I have noticed though is there seems to be a sharp disagreement between people who have practiced law in New York who seem to largely think this is a straightforward case to prove and people who have not practiced in New York who think it's shaky. Then again this Bruce Rivers guy is from Minnesota so who knows.