Honestly, and you are right calling me out on this, I've kinda quit reading the forums around here. I'll post 2-3 times a day, sometimes more, sometimes not at all, but generally I've been spending less and less and less time because it's filled with a pervasively horrible attitude and draws decent, normal people into absolutely stupid and pointless fighting / arguing. Video cards are championed as much as sports teams, it really is crazy.
If you actually look at HardOCP, TechReport, or OCN, on other forums and professional reviews, there are many members at those forums who agree that AMD is now leading in price/performance and has the faster single-GPU card overall. At the same time, maybe on those other forums if some member says that GTX680 beats HD7970 at most games, people don't bother responding that he is wrong just because they may not care to waste time? Maybe a lot more of our forum members care about price/performance and less about specific features or top-of-the-line overvolted hardware/modded performance that other forum's members do? For example, you may seem like a lesser enthusiast at OCN if you want to save $ and not get the fastest card, the best CPU cooler, go for the highest CPU overclock regardless if it lowers the life expectancy of your CPU long-term? It could just be that some of those forum members just always want the best and fastest components in which case price/performance is not really that important for them, while 3dMark11 score benchmarks and overclocking to the max may be.
Maybe the question is why are such obvious and trivial items as NV trailing in price/performance right now being debated on our forum over and over while they are generally accepted as fact by professional reviewers? Things also would be a lot better if people weren't so hypocritical about power consumption and didn't show double standards regarding OCing that were often not brought up during GTX460/470/480/570/580 launches.
If you recall last generation, GTX570 and HD6970 had similar level of performance but 570 tended to cost a little less and overclocked better and had a decent advantage in some DX11 games at 1080P, while 6970 pulled away at 1600P. It wasn't hard to recommended the 6950/570 cards over 6970/580 cards either for their excellent price/performance. Yet, this generation, people on our forum are having a real struggle it seems with recommending a 7950 over the 670 and 7970 over the 680 when the roles are reversed.
While this generation is pretty close in performance, much like HD6950 vs. GTX560Ti / 448 core or HD6970 vs. GTX570 were, the difference at the moment is that NV's prices are much higher relative to AMD's cards than based on how HD6870/HD6950/6970 vs. GTX560/560Ti/GTX570 series stacked up.
When HD7950 is going for as low at
$275, there shouldn't be any debate that 660Ti/670 are overpriced, and yet there is. That's what's changed this generation ==> it seems price/performance is no longer important?