[tt] gtx660

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Just so we're clear - a card that consumes considerably more power (70 watts), dumps it all back into a case, is unstable out of the box, and is louder than the gtx690 is better, right? OMG1FAMNF reviewers received defective 590's where are the pitchforks now?

There were pitchforks, for both products. Jesus do you even read the forums? Read the 7990 thread, first two pages are "LOL, MEH, FAIL" until someone pointed out "hey the card is broken, check this other review out" and then it turned to "guess it isn't that bad."

Stir the pot some more why don't you.
 

tviceman

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2008
6,734
514
126
www.facebook.com
There were pitchforks, for both products. Jesus do you even read the forums? Read the 7990 thread, first two pages are "LOL, MEH, FAIL" until someone pointed out "hey the card is broken, check this other review out" and then it turned to "guess it isn't that bad."

Stir the pot some more why don't you.

Honestly, and you are right calling me out on this, I've kinda quit reading the forums around here. I'll post 2-3 times a day, sometimes more, sometimes not at all, but generally I've been spending less and less and less time because it's filled with a pervasively horrible attitude and draws decent, normal people into absolutely stupid and pointless fighting / arguing. Video cards are championed as much as sports teams, it really is crazy.
 

Crap Daddy

Senior member
May 6, 2011
610
0
0
Wrong.



The same price, higher power consumption, lower performance, and lower performance per watt. Nothing is better about it.

You will never ever convince some guys around here that AMD has never launched a 7990 and will never do so, that the 7970GE is an overclocked 7970 branded as reference AMD product, that Nvidia is not late, the GTX680 was launched 2 months after the 7970 while being faster and cheaper, that the 670 was launched 3 1/2 months after the 7950 while being faster and cheaper, that AMD has gone through three price cuts to remain competitive, that Nvidia sold more cards in a quarter when they only had two 28nm products versus the whole AMD 7000 lineup and I could go on and on.
 

n0x1ous

Platinum Member
Sep 9, 2010
2,574
252
126
Hey, whatever you have to tell yourself

Dont have to tell myself anything. There is no OFFICIAL 7990. Just a partner doing a custom card. So if EVGA puts 3 GK104's on a card and sells it you consider that a NV product that is faster then everything?

Please. Stop being ridiculous. 7990 is a Powercolor product not an official AMD Product
 
Last edited:

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
Honestly, and you are right calling me out on this, I've kinda quit reading the forums around here. I'll post 2-3 times a day, sometimes more, sometimes not at all, but generally I've been spending less and less and less time because it's filled with a pervasively horrible attitude and draws decent, normal people into absolutely stupid and pointless fighting / arguing. Video cards are championed as much as sports teams, it really is crazy.

Unfortunately, I completely agree with you. This seems to be an issue across a lot of forums I frequent. I try to ignore it, but man some of these people fight like their lives are depending on it. Woof.

Back to trying to find relevant information on these forums.
 

SirPauly

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2009
5,187
1
0
For me, allow the market to decide what the pricing may be! If a product can't sustain its asking price, the market may adjust the price. No biggie in the big picture.
 

railven

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2010
6,604
561
126
But how was this in Nvidia's best interest? I really wanted to go Nvidia this time around. But not for a $100 price premium.

You sort of answered your question. $100 premium IS in Nvidia's best interest.

You want to go nVidia, you know the rules, otherwise, find an alternative.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,989
620
126
Did you just say, that you have to have both AMD and Nvidia cards to be considered non-biased? Man, think before you type.
How about you read before you respond. I said ---
It's not fair to call someone biased and blind that has both.​
You basically called out a member and accused them of being incapable of showing any impartiality. :thumbsdown:
There's no reason to think gk106 won't have the same clock potential. Everything on 28nm so far seem to top out at ~1.3ghz on the core. Some go higher with heaps of vcore, but its a rarity.

Therefore 660 should with good custom models manage to hit 1.2ghz+ boost.

Would be a nice card if priced ~$220, slotting right in. It's TDP of 140W (in games it should be less) is also nice, fitting with the 7850 and 7870 which draw ~100-120W peak in games. NV doesn't have to offer better perf/$, they just have to be comparable and it should outsell anything AMD can offer.
Agreed. In fact the 660 will likely become the best selling Kepler in short order.
 

Final8ty

Golden Member
Jun 13, 2007
1,172
13
81
RS is one of the most unbiased people that post here.

You should chill on him not be so emotional about the facts he posts.

Indeed i stumbled across one of RS earlier posts when the 7xxx series first came out and he was slamming AMD and again when NV brought out the 6xx series, but the situation has changed, so rightly has he's stance.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
How about you read before you respond. I said ---

It's not fair to call someone biased and blind that has both.
You basically called out a member and accused them of being incapable of showing any impartiality. :thumbsdown:
I read it perfectly.
Is that what I basically did, AnandthenMan?
What did the other guy do?
 
Last edited:

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
How about you read before you respond. I said ---
It's not fair to call someone biased and blind that has both.​
You basically called out a member and accused them of being incapable of showing any impartiality. :thumbsdown:

Agreed. In fact the 660 will likely become the best selling Kepler in short order.

Yes. With a chip built specifically for geforce and the price and flexibility of smaller chips on 28nm maturing processes, and a target near the sweet spot of $199-230 I think this may be a very hot seller so long as price to performance even matches, let alone beats, other cards of similar pricing. If it performs better than rumors say, it may sell out even faster.
 

Crap Daddy

Senior member
May 6, 2011
610
0
0
think this may be a very hot seller so long as price to performance even matches, let alone beats, other cards of similar pricing. If it performs better than rumors say, it may sell out even faster.

Latest rumors say the price will be 229$.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Take a look at Q2 and see that it was Geforce that drove the profit. Tegra margins are slim and needs even more babysitting than Pro, which accidentally was down.
GeForce eats tons of Pro costs, but is still the most important Nvidia asset - by far. And it doesn't look like this will change any time soon.

Professional Graphics division makes nearly as as much $ as the combined Desktop and Notebook GeForce divisions. They are both important since without GeForce you probably cannot have Tesla/Quadro since most likely you won't be able to sustain the expensive R&D/engineering costs. At the same time without the professional graphics division and 95% market share NV has in those segments, GeForce brand probably would be seriously struggling just like AMD's Graphics division now is. On the surface, GeForce brand is more recognized worldwide, but you can't say it's the most important product line for making $ for NV. If you remove Professional Graphics revenue and cash flow from NV, it would hardly look much better than what AMD's stand-alone GPU units looks like today. There isn't that much $ to be made in the consumer graphics segment today. Corporate clients is where profit margins are very high and there are plenty of growth opportunities there for GPU makers as GPGPU compute is a growing segment, while the discrete graphics business is barely growing, if at all (I believe 7% decline for the industry last quarter). You can even think of the GeForce desktop business as a cost centre for the Professional Graphics division.

The fact that NV delayed Kepler desktop parts and instead focused on mobile discrete segment design wins and is aiming to launch GK110 in Q4 2012 for the professional markets first shows that desktop discrete GeForce business is perhaps only 3rd most important on its totem pole at the moment.

Latest rumors say the price will be 229$.

That's much better.
 
Last edited:

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
Latest rumors say the price will be 229$.

Great price. Gives same flexibility as HTC 460 1gb pricing. Sales, game bundles, etc. Expect sales to pop up after launch if necessary, like with gtx 460. Should be the card a lot of people are waiting for.
 

blastingcap

Diamond Member
Sep 16, 2010
6,654
5
76
Professional Graphics division makes nearly as as much $ as the combined Desktop and Notebook GeForce divisions. Not sure what you are talking about. They are both important since without GeForce you cannot have Tesla/Quadro since most likely you won't be able to sustain the expensive R&D. At the same time without the professional graphics division and 95% market share NV has in those segments, GeForce brand probably would be seriously struggling just like AMD's Graphics division now is. On the surface, GeForce brand is more recognized worldwide, but you can't say it's the most important product line for making $ for NV. If you remove Professional Graphics revenue and cash flow from NV, it would hardly look much better than what AMD's stand-alone GPU units looks like today. There isn't that much $ to be made in the consumer graphics segment. Corporate clients is where all the real $ and growth opportunities are for GPU makers.

Yes and I don't want to explain yet again what 28nm constraints do. It should be blindingly obvious why nvidia steadfastly refuses to drop gtx 680 prices even as 7970s sell for less, and its not because of gaming. Hint: there is a lot less demand for tahiti chips in pro cards.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Yes and I don't want to explain yet again what 28nm constraints do. It should be blindingly obvious why nvidia steadfastly refuses to drop gtx 680 prices even as 7970s sell for less, and its not because of gaming. Hint: there is a lot less demand for tahiti chips in pro cards.

Yes, but there is another reason too - it's not only because NV has a shortage of 680 parts or that AMD has excess 7970 cards. If NV couldn't sell GTX680 at $500, it'd have to lower prices eventually. That means people are still buying GTX680 cards at these prices in large enough volumes that NV doesn't feel any pressure in the GeForce market share at the enthusiast level. That's not surprising of course since gamers have paid $100 more for slower GeForce cards in the past ($299 4870 vs. $399 GTX260).

There is something about AMD brand that doesn't vibe well with the average consumer. ATI did not have this brand image problem and had no problem selling $300-550 GPUs when they were faster. HD7970 GE is clearly faster than a GTX680 overall and yet AMD sells it for lower. I don't recall ATI doing this when they had a fast high end GPU (9700Pro, 9800Pro, 9800XT, X800XT, X850XT, X1900XTX, X1950XTX, etc.). It seems the average consumer is willing to pay more for a similarly performing NV card. This is probably why NV has no trouble selling GTX680 even at $500-550.

Some people on our forum have said they wouldn't consider an AMD GPU unless it was 50% cheaper and at least 2x faster at the same time than the NV card.
 

AnandThenMan

Diamond Member
Nov 11, 2004
3,989
620
126
Getting off topic a bit, but I'm not sure anything can lift AMD's share price out of the cellar at this point.
 

RussianSensation

Elite Member
Sep 5, 2003
19,458
765
126
Honestly, and you are right calling me out on this, I've kinda quit reading the forums around here. I'll post 2-3 times a day, sometimes more, sometimes not at all, but generally I've been spending less and less and less time because it's filled with a pervasively horrible attitude and draws decent, normal people into absolutely stupid and pointless fighting / arguing. Video cards are championed as much as sports teams, it really is crazy.

If you actually look at HardOCP, TechReport, or OCN, on other forums and professional reviews, there are many members at those forums who agree that AMD is now leading in price/performance and has the faster single-GPU card overall. At the same time, maybe on those other forums if some member says that GTX680 beats HD7970 at most games, people don't bother responding that he is wrong just because they may not care to waste time? Maybe a lot more of our forum members care about price/performance and less about specific features or top-of-the-line overvolted hardware/modded performance that other forum's members do? For example, you may seem like a lesser enthusiast at OCN if you want to save $ and not get the fastest card, the best CPU cooler, go for the highest CPU overclock regardless if it lowers the life expectancy of your CPU long-term? It could just be that some of those forum members just always want the best and fastest components in which case price/performance is not really that important for them, while 3dMark11 score benchmarks and overclocking to the max may be.

Maybe the question is why are such obvious and trivial items as NV trailing in price/performance right now being debated on our forum over and over while they are generally accepted as fact by professional reviewers? Things also would be a lot better if people weren't so hypocritical about power consumption and didn't show double standards regarding OCing that were often not brought up during GTX460/470/480/570/580 launches.

If you recall last generation, GTX570 and HD6970 had similar level of performance but 570 tended to cost a little less and overclocked better and had a decent advantage in some DX11 games at 1080P, while 6970 pulled away at 1600P. It wasn't hard to recommended the 6950/570 cards over 6970/580 cards either for their excellent price/performance. Yet, this generation, people on our forum are having a real struggle it seems with recommending a 7950 over the 670 and 7970 over the 680 when the roles are reversed.

While this generation is pretty close in performance, much like HD6950 vs. GTX560Ti / 448 core or HD6970 vs. GTX570 were, the difference at the moment is that NV's prices are much higher relative to AMD's cards than based on how HD6870/HD6950/6970 vs. GTX560/560Ti/GTX570 series stacked up.

When HD7950 is going for as low at $275, there shouldn't be any debate that 660Ti/670 are overpriced, and yet there is. That's what's changed this generation ==> it seems price/performance is no longer important?
 
Last edited:

Crap Daddy

Senior member
May 6, 2011
610
0
0
The fact that NV delayed Kepler desktop parts and instead focused on mobile discrete segment design wins and is aiming to launch GK110 in Q4 2012 for the professional markets first shows that desktop discrete GeForce business is perhaps only 3rd most important on its totem pole at the moment.

I think it will be, if not already, the fourth. The SoC side of Nvidia has really taken off with Tegra 3.
 

notty22

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2010
3,375
0
0
SNIP==> it seems price/performance is no longer important?


What is with these wall of text soliloquies. You are repeating the same drama over and over. Are you losing sleep over video cards/ brand preference and the launch of new models that you have to vent @ over the top pace before the card is even reviewed ?

We are seeing random hot deals on various AMD models that have been out for a while in the channel, that launched at much higher pricing. These hot deals are great values for watchful shoppers, but you build rants around them/ the pricing. While other models of the same gpu are much costlier.
It's borderline strawman, but that tern is over-used now. That price on that MSI card is very good. MSI has been one of the leaders with good pricing on high value custom cards. Even the new Nvidia models from MSI, don't carry much premium. That's all.
 

f1sherman

Platinum Member
Apr 5, 2011
2,243
1
0
Professional Graphics division makes nearly as as much $ as the combined Desktop and Notebook GeForce divisions.


I knew someone would link Trefis
Fact is there is no "Desktop" and "Notebook" GeForce divisions.

And what would this phantom "Notebook GeForce division" be selling?

Notebooks, trains...?

There is only GPU, Professional Solutions and Consumer Products Business.



The fact that NV delayed Kepler desktop parts and instead focused on mobile discrete segment design wins and is aiming to launch GK110 in Q4 2012 for the professional markets first shows that desktop discrete GeForce business is perhaps only 3rd most important on its totem pole at the moment.

I see... another apology from Nvidia, 1st one for being 6-7 months late, and now for letting down Desktop would be in order?
Should they be focusing on Pro GPU in the middle of all those Ivy laptops launches?

It's called timing. Folks from AMD might need a lesson in it, not Nvidia.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |