- Mar 20, 2000
- 102,389
- 8,547
- 126
we always thought our high school chem teacher was the unabomber. until he was caught, at least.
I thought geez he died? Is he that old? Damn, tempest fugit, he was 81.
we always thought our high school chem teacher was the unabomber. until he was caught, at least.
As it turns out, Ted wasn’t wrong about airlines.
I disagree. He pretty much starts each thought he has from a bunch of loose assumptions, treats these as absolute truths then extrapolates from there.I mean, the annoying thing about his manifesto is that it's very hard for pretty much anyone not to sympathize with the issues that he raises. He was a very smart guy.
His methods, tho....
I disagree. He pretty much starts each thought he has from a bunch of loose assumptions, treats these as absolute truths then extrapolates from there.
He seems confused about what he's angry about and confused about a solution.
I disagree. He pretty much starts each thought he has from a bunch of loose assumptions, treats these as absolute truths then extrapolates from there.
He seems confused about what he's angry about and confused about a solution.
He was the ideal libertarian until he started using the postal service.I mean, the annoying thing about his manifesto is that it's very hard for pretty much anyone not to sympathize with the issues that he raises. He was a very smart guy.
His methods, tho....
He strikes me as the ultimate expression of right justifies might. He saw violence as a way to awaken us from our ignorance and for our sake. Violence and terror become the logical means to a utopian future. He did not want to face the reality of the hopelessness of our situation. There is only one person we can save, the last person on Earth we feel deserves it. Thus is born ideology and the pursuit of perfection.well, I never read the whole thing Just snippets. But maybe that's what's going on here--the issues and problems are real, but b/c of his warped brain (MK Ultra program, I think?), he colors these issues through distorted lens from the beginning that can only really force a broken path of logic that would only ever lead to murder and violence as his solution.
Careful there. People with unusual abilities of analysis and judgement in any field, when recognized for that fact, generate a lot of envy. Equating math aptitude with weirdness might get unwanted recognition as a keen observer. My bet is that people gifted in math generate intense but concealed envy because being bad at math in school can, like being gifted at it, generate lots of social putdowns. We all know that anybody different needs to be put down and once you feel bad about yourself you act in ways that support the supposition.I'd argue for somewhere in the middle. He raised some legit points, at least on a philosophical sort-of-level, but deciding that the solution to the problems he pointed to was to try to blow people up was just nuts. In my opinion he was not-right-in-the-head. A lot of people who are very talented at maths are a bit weird, in my experience.
Also - did he start the trend of killers having to have a 'manifesto'? Or was that a "thing" before he was active?