VR-Zone x2900xt review

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Genx87
Why do i have a feeling because Nvidia had issues with their first run drivers for Vista, they are going to be carrying that stigma for years with the ATI fanboi crowd?

We will be here in 2010 talking about how the G100 and Nvidia drivers suck for Vista.

Anyways, I have been playing games on Vista Business for 3 weeks and have no issues with the graphics drivers. The one issue I am running into is in COH and it is an application issue.

Anyways, this card is out, from the review I read, this looks like ATI\AMD's NV30. Late to the party for a new DX10 gen chip, not impressive performance wise, big, hot, and consumes power like a factory.

But at least it is out, and we can all start to move forward with realizing certain companies arent infallible. Personally I am wondering how much AMD got conned by the ATI execs. They knew of the performance expectations\issues with the R600 a year ago and their economic expectations as well, yet somehow got AMD to sign off on it.

nvidia is still carrying around the stigma of the DustBuster ... nv30
--that is the way it *works* ... it is "history"

and it appears there are STILL issues with nvidia drivers ... look at the "poll"

and 'no '... you got it wrong ... AMD *knew exactly* what they were getting in r600
-they *didn't know* about g80

nvidia BLINDsided them with a great GPU ... that is WHY they respun r600 so many times and added so many "features"

it is taking AMD a few more respins and a die shrink to produce the GTX-killer, HD2950XTX ... and by then nvidia will have 8900 ready

so the beat goes on :music:

and i am LOVING it

AMD is back in business!
:beer:

this is THEIR x1800xt !!

they are not giving up on the high end

. . . and they fired their PR and marketing

*competitiveness* is next to godliness
:thumbsup:

we *all* win

 

rmed64

Senior member
Feb 4, 2005
237
0
0
Originally posted by: n7
Not very impressed with this review.

Not much for high resolution results, where we already know the HD 2900 XT does better, & far too many stupid benches w/o AA.

Who the eff uses no AA these days...

No Vista results either :frown:
I am sick of seeing reviewing assuming people are still stuck using a 5 year old OS.

As for IQ, you guys are f*cking retarded.

AF was comparable between both 2900 & 8800s, maybe slightly better when blown up on 8800s.
How much of the time playing games are you going to be saving screenshots, & then blowing them up to gaze at the AF features for hours? :roll:

AA was arguably slightly better on the 2900 when blown up.
Again, since when do people spending hours staring @ enlarged screenshots of games? :roll:

Stop being f*cking morons, seriously.

I'll be waiting for more reviews showing the cards @ 2560x1600 (where i want to be able to play at) in Vista

Sorry, but not all of us buy into new, still buggy/unstable operating systems with no real benefit of upgrading over XP at the moment.

Not to mention the fact it is slower in gaming than XP, no rush my friend....no rush.
 

n7

Elite Member
Jan 4, 2004
21,281
4
81
Originally posted by: rmed64
Sorry, but not all of us buy into new, still buggy/unstable operating systems with no real benefit of upgrading over XP at the moment.

Not to mention the fact it is slower in gaming than XP, no rush my friend....no rush.

I am not going to even dignify that with a detailed response, since i can tell you have no clue what you are talking about with regards to Vista.

Some of us have actually used the OS; some of us have used it for a long time.

So please educate/inform yourself before telling me which OS i should be running.

Reason for poorer gaming performance on Vista is largely ATi/nVidia's fault; it's not MS's responsibility to create drivers.

 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: rmed64
Sorry, but not all of us buy into new, still buggy/unstable operating systems with no real benefit of upgrading over XP at the moment.

Not to mention the fact it is slower in gaming than XP, no rush my friend....no rush.

I am not going to even dignify that with a detailed response, since i can tell you have no clue what you are talking about with regards to Vista.

Some of us have actually used the OS; some of us have used it for a long time.

So please educate/inform yourself before telling me which OS i should be running.

Reason for poorer gaming performance on Vista is largely ATi/nVidia's fault; it's not MS's responsibility to create drivers.

now you sound like a MS fanboy

there *are* issues with Vista

understandable ones since it is a new OS

and there is no pointing "fault" at other companies for Vista inconsistencies

and without ANY doubt - at the moment - all games run faster in XP

that is a single BIG reason for me to 'wait' .... i *only* have 2GB RAM

you upgraded ... that is *awesome* but don't expect us to share your enthusiasm for Vista ... not yet, anyway

i *know* i will upgrade ... when a game i want to play *requires* it

--why before?

i am *already familiar* with it
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: n7
Originally posted by: rmed64
Sorry, but not all of us buy into new, still buggy/unstable operating systems with no real benefit of upgrading over XP at the moment.

Not to mention the fact it is slower in gaming than XP, no rush my friend....no rush.

I am not going to even dignify that with a detailed response, since i can tell you have no clue what you are talking about with regards to Vista.

Some of us have actually used the OS; some of us have used it for a long time.

So please educate/inform yourself before telling me which OS i should be running.

Reason for poorer gaming performance on Vista is largely ATi/nVidia's fault; it's not MS's responsibility to create drivers.

You?re absolutely right n7 but it doesn?t face the fact that Vista is crap!

I don?t get some of you the HD XT looks very competitive to the GTS; to me it?s only driver issue.
 

Summitdrinker

Golden Member
May 10, 2004
1,193
0
0
ya why go to vista?

xp does everything for me

vista to me means getting a new system to help out for all the load and bloat

even if you have the latest cpu, motherboard, lots a ram etc xp will be faster for games with or without driver bugs

sure I will have vista in two years or so, but untill then it's xp for me

ocworkbench H2900XT review

It reviews H2900XT




 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: swtethan
Originally posted by: apoppin
and you aren't me

what does that say?


and you appear to be part of the 'exception' ... rather than the rule

find my poll, look at the results

asking nvidia GTX fans to say there are problems with their drivers
:Q

uh-huh

sounds really "scientific"

great another useless poll

damn ... it DOES appear to be useful

can you say *back-fire*
:Q

LOTs of 8800 driver issues

--and check out nvidia own forums

you ARE the exception if you have ZERO issues

sure i want to take a 'chance' .... with a $600 GPU that had crap driver support for the first 4 months of its life ... yeah it IS getting better ... it's MID-MAY! ... it launched LAST year
:thumbsdown:



NEITHER card ... for now

Umm, Apoppin? I don't have any issues either with my GTS.
Games I play:

PREY
CoD2
STALKER
Painkiller
FEAR and FEAR Multiplayer.

All of these games (with the exception of painkiller) are popular, commonly played games. I am using the latest drivers from NV.

My best friend, whose system I just built and is identical to mine hardware wise.

Plays: Same as above. Zero problems.

My brother in law, whose system I just built and is identical to mine hardware wise.

Plays:

CoD2
City of Heroes

Zero problems.

I think many of these problems exist between the keyboard and the chair. Cause I'll tell you right now, three out of three machines, one a fresh WinXP install (my friends), and mine and my brother in laws systems I cloned so we could retain our software installations. Just installed Windows XP over old installs to redetect new hardware.

So, in light of the 3 systems not having any problems, is the OP still the exception?
Your polarity switch has flipped once again, methinks. Or it never flipped to begin with. Sorry to say.
 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Frackal
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
still, despite nvidia's market superiority, the high end x18/19xx cards were clearly superior to nvidia's 7 series in both performance and image quality. even w/o the shimmering nvidia could not match ati's HQAF.

I agree. I went from 7800GTX to x1900xtx and I found better image quality, and a near doubling of performance, PARTICULARLY when minimum framerates as well as maximum framerates were taken into account. X1900xtx had much less 'swing' between the two, providing a smoother and superior experience

i didn't see it


x850xt > x1950P better IQ with the pro
x1950 > 7800GS OC > x1950p --toss a coin ... both beautiful IQ


--and perhaps the later drivers corrected this ... wasn't my GS in march-april?


the only difference is that my x1950p is faster ... OF COURSE it is smoother

7800GS couldn't even come close to matching ati's HQAF. no need to take mine or anyone else's word for it on the forum; read ANY review comparing r5xx to g7x and it will say the same thing...
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

and thanks for your "opinion" CaiNaM ... i had the HQ-IQs maxed on both cards ...
still do - at times on my x1950p

perhaps there was/is something wrong with all 3 of my x1950ps so that their IQ was not so perfect each time
:roll:

or perhaps the CRT and the LCD couldn't display the difference

but my eyes were recently checked and they are "fine"

sorry ... man i thought the nvidia card looked "fine"
-- it was just "slower"

the *problem* with HQ AF is the performance hit ... much more severe on the lesser card
 

ronnn

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
3,918
0
71
Zardon at DH says their review will be up soon - so expect reviews tonight.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: Swethan is no exception.

 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: The OP is no exception.

AGAIN ... it isn't *me* saying this

Look at the Poll - intended to prove otherwise

there ARE issues ... much more than usual

look at the STALKER thread ... big nvidia issues and workarounds

look a the nvidia support forums ... STILL driver problems

much more so then USUAL

that is *all* i AM saying

what is wrong with MY "assessment" of the situation - also BASED on what i OBSERVE in the "real world"


perhaps i am confused because my experience is different than yours ... and yours is less than a week to be an "expert" on driver issues to *dismiss* mine
 

Fenixgoon

Lifer
Jun 30, 2003
32,969
12,319
136
benchmarks look promising - especially once drivers mature and fix AA/performance issues.
 

Stumps

Diamond Member
Jun 18, 2001
7,125
0
0
I don't know if it is just me or not, but the release of the X2900XT seems to remind me of the release of the Radeon 8500....pretty good performance but not as fast as Nvidia's fastest offering, lots of driver issues and late as hell.

Not that the 8500 was a bad thing (I still have my Hercules 8500 somewhere in a box), but by the time it was sorted, Nvidia had the GF4 TI 4600 out and it pretty much left the 8500 for dead.

Hmmm seems like a repeat of late 2001 early 2002....

hopefully AMD/ATI can do what they did in mid 2002 again.
 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: The OP is no exception.

AGAIN ... it isn't *me* saying this

Look at the Poll - intended to prove otherwise

there ARE issues ... much more than usual

look at the STALKER thread ... big nvidia issues and workarounds

look a the nvidia support forums ... STILL driver problems

much more so then USUAL

that is *all* i AM saying

what is wrong with MY "assessment" of the situation - also BASED on what i OBSERVE in the "real world"


perhaps i am confused because my experience is different than yours ... and yours is less than a week to be an "expert" on driver issues to *dismiss* mine

At the minimum, at least I own the target of criticism and in a much better position than yourself to comment on them. No matter what you "hear" or "observe", I think people will be more inclined to believe what I have to say in the matter. You owned a 7800GS, not a G80. And once again, the simple fact that I have only had this PC for just over a week, doesn't make my system any less "configured" than any other. I have been playing the snot out of this rig and thoroughly amazed at the difference in performance.

One week, one month or 1 year really doesn't matter. It is what it is. No reason for anything to change a month, two three months from now. I run a clean system, and I know what I'm doing. More than you would imagine.

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80. Especially in Vista. But, Vista is a problem all in itself.

G80's, R600's, G7x's, R5xx, all the way down the line do have, and will have problems of different nature. Always have, always will.

And "of course" the G80 complaints are going to be "more than usual" and you know exactly why that is don't you? Brand spanking new, first generation unified architecture for Nvidia. I'll tell you, If R600 is in any way shape or form "brethren" to the Xenos GPU, that would mean R600 is second gen unified for AMD/ATI. I'd be very surprised if it had as many issues out of the gate. At least it had better not have as many.

And what about the poll?

under XP:

18 little to zero probs
2 have a lot of errors
2 have moderate errors

Under Vista:

8 have little to zero errors
3 have a lot of errors
4 have moderate errors

G80 looks fabulous under XP, yes?

Vista is the problematic area.

About a 50/50 ratio probs/no probs.

I wonder why. Completely New ground up OS and Completely New ground up GPU Architecture.

Makes a lot of sense when reasons are given why there are problems.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: The OP is no exception.

AGAIN ... it isn't *me* saying this

Look at the Poll - intended to prove otherwise

there ARE issues ... much more than usual

look at the STALKER thread ... big nvidia issues and workarounds

look a the nvidia support forums ... STILL driver problems

much more so then USUAL

that is *all* i AM saying

what is wrong with MY "assessment" of the situation - also BASED on what i OBSERVE in the "real world"


perhaps i am confused because my experience is different than yours ... and yours is less than a week to be an "expert" on driver issues to *dismiss* mine

At the minimum, at least I own the target of criticism and in a much better position than yourself to comment on them. No matter what you "hear" or "observe", I think people will be more inclined to believe what I have to say in the matter. You owned a 7800GS, not a G80. And once again, the simple fact that I have only had this PC for just over a week, doesn't make my system any less "configured" than any other. I have been playing the snot out of this rig and thoroughly amazed at the difference in performance.

One week, one month or 1 year really doesn't matter. It is what it is. No reason for anything to change a month, two three months from now. I run a clean system, and I know what I'm doing. More than you would imagine.

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80. Especially in Vista. But, Vista is a problem all in itself.

G80's, R600's, G7x's, R5xx, all the way down the line do have, and will have problems of different nature. Always have, always will.

And "of course" the G80 complaints are going to be "more than usual" and you know exactly why that is don't you? Brand spanking new, first generation unified architecture for Nvidia. I'll tell you, If R600 is in any way shape or form "brethren" to the Xenos GPU, that would mean R600 is second gen unified for AMD/ATI. I'd be very surprised if it had as many issues out of the gate. At least it had better not have as many.
better - smetter

we have *agreed* on the core issue - exactly what *i* have stated

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80.

thank-you

that is *all* i wanted to hear ... that is all i ever said ... and don't 'nitpick' *degree*

and i am emphatically 'agreed' with everything else
-even your "excuses"

so now ... what?



 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: apoppin
and thanks for your "opinion" CaiNaM ... i had the HQ-IQs maxed on both cards ...
still do - at times on my x1950p

perhaps there was/is something wrong with all 3 of my x1950ps so that their IQ was not so perfect each time
:roll:

or perhaps the CRT and the LCD couldn't display the difference

but my eyes were recently checked and they are "fine"

either have your displays checked or your eyes again then lol.

i don't think even gstan, at's favorite nv propoganda machine, has tried to claim teh 7 series had suprerior IQ. in fact, i think you are alone in that respect as i don't recall anyone claiming the 7 series IQ was equal to r5xx (tho admittedly the 7 series had a bit better transparency AA).

sorry ... man i thought the nvidia card looked "fine"
-- it was just "slower"

the *problem* with HQ AF is the performance hit ... much more severe on the lesser card

hmm.. there wasn't a singe game i didn't run 16xHQAT on my XT... can't speak for my 1950PRO as it mostly plays WoW... which runs well on any system heh.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
yeah ... on the XT

i *never* said "teh 7 series had suprerior IQ"[sic.]

--where do you get that?


and i said it looked "fine" ... i generally DON'T run with 'max' AF ... NEVER on the GS ... --except to test it
--neither on my x1950p ... i don't like the blurr

 

Keysplayr

Elite Member
Jan 16, 2003
21,211
50
91
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: The OP is no exception.

AGAIN ... it isn't *me* saying this

Look at the Poll - intended to prove otherwise

there ARE issues ... much more than usual

look at the STALKER thread ... big nvidia issues and workarounds

look a the nvidia support forums ... STILL driver problems

much more so then USUAL

that is *all* i AM saying

what is wrong with MY "assessment" of the situation - also BASED on what i OBSERVE in the "real world"


perhaps i am confused because my experience is different than yours ... and yours is less than a week to be an "expert" on driver issues to *dismiss* mine

At the minimum, at least I own the target of criticism and in a much better position than yourself to comment on them. No matter what you "hear" or "observe", I think people will be more inclined to believe what I have to say in the matter. You owned a 7800GS, not a G80. And once again, the simple fact that I have only had this PC for just over a week, doesn't make my system any less "configured" than any other. I have been playing the snot out of this rig and thoroughly amazed at the difference in performance.

One week, one month or 1 year really doesn't matter. It is what it is. No reason for anything to change a month, two three months from now. I run a clean system, and I know what I'm doing. More than you would imagine.

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80. Especially in Vista. But, Vista is a problem all in itself.

G80's, R600's, G7x's, R5xx, all the way down the line do have, and will have problems of different nature. Always have, always will.

And "of course" the G80 complaints are going to be "more than usual" and you know exactly why that is don't you? Brand spanking new, first generation unified architecture for Nvidia. I'll tell you, If R600 is in any way shape or form "brethren" to the Xenos GPU, that would mean R600 is second gen unified for AMD/ATI. I'd be very surprised if it had as many issues out of the gate. At least it had better not have as many.
better - smetter

we have *agreed* on the core issue - exactly what *i* have stated

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80.

thank-you

that is *all* i wanted to hear ... that is all i ever said ... and don't 'nitpick' *degree*

and i am emphatically 'agreed' with everything else
-even your "excuses"

so now ... what?

My excuses for what? What is it that I'm trying to excuse here? I don't understand "exactly" what you're getting at. Explain please.

 

Regs

Lifer
Aug 9, 2002
16,665
21
81
Drivers are a issue.

Well, I'm not impressed and the GTS 640's are going for 389.00 on Newegg. So unless they decide to sell them for 300 dollars I think I'd take the one that's been on the market and in software developers hands for over 6 months.

I wasn't expecting anything huge as RVwhatever was an ongoing project from the ol' ATi.

And I do not want to out on a rant either. Simply put I have no need to upgrade right now and I'm more interested to see what Crysis and other delayed-to-no-end games offer on hardware that is out at the time.

If AMD wants their "flagship" to be a success they better damn well listen to the game developers and not MS.
 

apoppin

Lifer
Mar 9, 2000
34,890
1
0
alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: apoppin
letsee .. how LONG have you had your system Keys?

an *entire week*

:Q

i don't think you can judge all those games yet

FINALLY *all* i am saying is that it is *documented* there are an unusually high number of driver complaints with 8800

more so than "usual"

and nvidia has been criticized for their slow response

- not *just* by me

although i am witness of some of them, rather 'first hand'

So your saying that maybe next week I'll have problems suddenly? As could the other two machines? For what reason?
Has it been the norm that the longer a person plays a game, the more of a chance the nvidia hardware/drivers with cause a problem because they age or something?

My point is: The OP is no exception.

AGAIN ... it isn't *me* saying this

Look at the Poll - intended to prove otherwise

there ARE issues ... much more than usual

look at the STALKER thread ... big nvidia issues and workarounds

look a the nvidia support forums ... STILL driver problems

much more so then USUAL

that is *all* i AM saying

what is wrong with MY "assessment" of the situation - also BASED on what i OBSERVE in the "real world"


perhaps i am confused because my experience is different than yours ... and yours is less than a week to be an "expert" on driver issues to *dismiss* mine

At the minimum, at least I own the target of criticism and in a much better position than yourself to comment on them. No matter what you "hear" or "observe", I think people will be more inclined to believe what I have to say in the matter. You owned a 7800GS, not a G80. And once again, the simple fact that I have only had this PC for just over a week, doesn't make my system any less "configured" than any other. I have been playing the snot out of this rig and thoroughly amazed at the difference in performance.

One week, one month or 1 year really doesn't matter. It is what it is. No reason for anything to change a month, two three months from now. I run a clean system, and I know what I'm doing. More than you would imagine.

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80. Especially in Vista. But, Vista is a problem all in itself.

G80's, R600's, G7x's, R5xx, all the way down the line do have, and will have problems of different nature. Always have, always will.

And "of course" the G80 complaints are going to be "more than usual" and you know exactly why that is don't you? Brand spanking new, first generation unified architecture for Nvidia. I'll tell you, If R600 is in any way shape or form "brethren" to the Xenos GPU, that would mean R600 is second gen unified for AMD/ATI. I'd be very surprised if it had as many issues out of the gate. At least it had better not have as many.
better - smetter

we have *agreed* on the core issue - exactly what *i* have stated

I would like to also emphatically agree that people are having problems with G80.

thank-you

that is *all* i wanted to hear ... that is all i ever said ... and don't 'nitpick' *degree*

and i am emphatically 'agreed' with everything else
-even your "excuses"

so now ... what?

My excuses for what? What is it that I'm trying to excuse here? I don't understand "exactly" what you're getting at. Explain please.

that there isn't *any difference* in our PoV

and your excuses for the FACT that "people are having problems with G80"

they are all valid "... Brand spanking new, first generation unified architecture ... Vista .... "

so what now ?


did you read theInq's review ... they explain *why* there is such variability with the HD-XT scores ...

drivers

and i'm sorry , Regs but this HD-XT is NOT "ATi's flagship"

HD-2900xt is the "GTS-Killer" ... they are priced about the same

and it appears to "spank" nvidia's card ... it's *only* competition ... not a $600 card
... nor an $800 card

that is for the refresh

read the *other* reviews
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |