Originally posted by: Imyourzero
Man, the last 7 replies have said Seagate. I thought there were some Seagate fans here...where were you guys this morning?
There are WAY too many Seagate fans here. Seriously, it's kinda bad. No one here admitted that 7200.8s sucked until the 7200.9s and 7200.10s rolled around. And when I pointed out reliability SUCKED according to SR data, everyone said it was BS and I was pulling data from polls and it wasn't credible data, etc, etc...
Stop saying WD sucks. I know they did back in the day of theri 120gb drives, but it's been a while, and WD reliability can easily match Seagate reliability today. 7200.8s sucked and I had 2 fail on me, but my 7200.9 has been holding up strong for some time now.
7200.7s were damn reliable, and I would stick with Seagate personally. The 7200.10 blows competition away in performance and what not.
IF you talk about noise and heat, while the 7200.10 is louder and hotter, it's not that much worse. Some 7200.10s are exceptionally loud, but do not use that to generalize the whole line. Read SR Forums nad you will know which ones are the loud ones, and hopefully you won't run into those.
That said I would be happy to have either, but I just bought myself 2x7200.10s.