What's your anti-drug...

[MX2]

Maturity

Thats not to say I havent done my share of partying in the past, but growing up and being responsible has to happen ya know

 

[Baked]

Free pr0n.

 

[gabemcg]

wait... if pot is not included, are mushrooms??? because I definitly do mushrooms...

 

[Atheus]

Originally posted by: Jehovah
I like to experience life as it is: meaning, no mind-altering substances where it alters my "true experiences".

Of course, being a fan of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, that doesn't *quite* work out, but whatever.

You imply there is only one true way to experience the world - perhaps there are myriad equaly valid mindstates achievable through learning, meditation, or drugs. If you are a philosopher, perhaps you would enjoy LSD? It will make you reconsider reality, for a few hours at least.

 

[illusion88]

But my pot is medicial!!

 

[Dualist]

Because of the law and they're bad for your health.

 

[Kadarin]

I have no "anti-drug" because I do not buy into the "War on Drugs" government propaganda.

 

[Leper Messiah]

Originally posted by: Atheus

Originally posted by: Jehovah
I like to experience life as it is: meaning, no mind-altering substances where it alters my "true experiences".

Of course, being a fan of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, that doesn't *quite* work out, but whatever.

You imply there is only one true way to experience the world - perhaps there are myriad equaly valid mindstates achievable through learning, meditation, or drugs. If you are a philosopher, perhaps you would enjoy LSD? It will make you reconsider reality, for a few hours at least.

Mescilaine.(Sp!) FTW?

 

[illusion88]

Originally posted by: gabemcg
wait... if pot is not included, are mushrooms??? because I definitly do mushrooms...

How can pot be considered a drug but mushrooms not?
Mushrooms are a far more powerful drug then pot is.

 

[Baked]

Originally posted by: Duality210
Because of the law and they're bad for your health.

I wonder why cigarettes and cigars are legal... oh that's right, money.

 

[meltdown75]

 

[hjo3]

Negative health effects (with or without impurities), danger associated with the sorts of criminals you'd have to deal with to get it. And in the case of marijuana, not wanting to end up like some lame, old, asshole hippy.

 

[techtonics]

Why can some people not accept that recreational drug users can be responsible at the same time? Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, so why can't the same apply to 'drugs'?

 

[Atheus]

Originally posted by: Leper Messiah

Originally posted by: Atheus

Originally posted by: Jehovah
I like to experience life as it is: meaning, no mind-altering substances where it alters my "true experiences".

Of course, being a fan of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, that doesn't *quite* work out, but whatever.

You imply there is only one true way to experience the world - perhaps there are myriad equaly valid mindstates achievable through learning, meditation, or drugs. If you are a philosopher, perhaps you would enjoy LSD? It will make you reconsider reality, for a few hours at least.

Mescilaine.(Sp!) FTW?

I never had mescaline, but i've had a related synthetic chemical called 2CB... The king was inside my sofa (don't know what he was the king of), and i was able to lift the bricks from my driveway and make floating shapes with them. This was a low dose.

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: techtonics
Why can some people not accept that recreational drug users can be responsible at the same time? Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, so why can't the same apply to 'drugs'?

don't waste your time. for many here, the notion of breaking the law is too much to handle. never mind if the act is not morally, ethically, mentally, or physically detrimental to one's well being.

 

[Heckler 5th]

What's your anti-drug...

patronizing and deceitful right-wing propaganda

 

[Leper Messiah]

Originally posted by: Atheus

Originally posted by: Leper Messiah

Originally posted by: Atheus

Originally posted by: Jehovah
I like to experience life as it is: meaning, no mind-altering substances where it alters my "true experiences".

Of course, being a fan of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, that doesn't *quite* work out, but whatever.

You imply there is only one true way to experience the world - perhaps there are myriad equaly valid mindstates achievable through learning, meditation, or drugs. If you are a philosopher, perhaps you would enjoy LSD? It will make you reconsider reality, for a few hours at least.

Mescilaine.(Sp!) FTW?

I never had mescaline, but i've had a related synthetic chemical called 2CB... The king was inside my sofa (don't know what he was the king of), and i was able to lift the bricks from my driveway and make floating shapes with them. This was a low dose.

Yeah, I've never had a bad trip on acid, shrooms or mescaline, but I've done all three a grand total of like 5 times put together.

Its like meltdown says. I agree with him completely.

 

[Queasy]

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: techtonics
Why can some people not accept that recreational drug users can be responsible at the same time? Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, so why can't the same apply to 'drugs'?

don't waste your time. for many here, the notion of breaking the law is too much to handle. never mind if the act is not morally, ethically, mentally, or physically detrimental to one's well being.

Because all the recreational drug users I met in high school and college turned into major losers. Not saying that is always the case....just my own anecdotal experience.

 

[meltdown75]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: techtonics
Why can some people not accept that recreational drug users can be responsible at the same time? Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, so why can't the same apply to 'drugs'?

don't waste your time. for many here, the notion of breaking the law is too much to handle. never mind if the act is not morally, ethically, mentally, or physically detrimental to one's well being.

Because all the recreational drug users I met in high school and college turned into major losers. Not saying that is always the case....just my own anecdotal experience.

if something as tame as weed can turn someone into a COMPLETE loser, they were a loser to begin with. *imho* (assuming that is the main rec. drug we are referring to...)

 

[Conky]

They call it dope for a reason.

 

[preslove]

Originally posted by: Queasy

Originally posted by: meltdown75

Originally posted by: techtonics
Why can some people not accept that recreational drug users can be responsible at the same time? Not everyone who drinks alcohol is an alcoholic, so why can't the same apply to 'drugs'?

don't waste your time. for many here, the notion of breaking the law is too much to handle. never mind if the act is not morally, ethically, mentally, or physically detrimental to one's well being.

Because all the recreational drug users I met in high school and college turned into major losers. Not saying that is always the case....just my own anecdotal experience.

I had an independent study project with a dude with a phd from Harvard's Kennedy School of Government. He is a great father, with three awesome kids. This guy ran around with big zip lock bags of powdered ecstacy when it was still legal. He's done more drugs than everybody in this thread, combined. There are plenty like him. Your anecdotal experience has let you become closed minded.

 

[CKent]

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
They call it dope for a reason.

Because there's a lot of propaganda in place to fool the dopes out there into supporting drugs' illegal status

 

[Lonyo]

Originally posted by: Pablo
Because its just all around a stupid thing to do?

Alcohol is less stupid?
Smoking is less stupid?
If you don't smoke OR drink alcohol, then your point of view is valid, but if you do either of the above, they are equally stupid, so you have no leg to stand on.
If you do both, well I won't even comment.

 

[BriGy86]

my anti-drug is violence

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Lonyo

Originally posted by: Pablo
Because its just all around a stupid thing to do?

Alcohol is less stupid?
Smoking is less stupid?
If you don't smoke OR drink alcohol, then your point of view is valid, but if you do either of the above, they are equally stupid, so you have no leg to stand on.
If you do both, well I won't even comment.

So you believe that getting high on Narcotics isn't stupid?