Who is at fault here?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,781
4,318
126
Both crossed over into the wrong lane, so both share some blame. But left turner was illegally in the intersection (not behind the cross walk) which forced the bad decision. Left turner gets most of the blame then for not yielding.
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,781
4,318
126
So if the light is yellow the right turner had right of way and if the light is red the left turner (already in the intersection) has right of way?

Is this universal?
Generally, right turner always has the right of way in this case. Also, almost universally the left turner can not legally be in the intersection until the full way is clear. Hanging out in the intersection is highly dangerous (imagine an oncoming car from any direction with failing breaks, the one hanging out there is now dead). Or imagine an emergency vehicle from any direction, the left turner is now blocking it. Thus it is generally illegal to hang out there as a left turner.
 
Last edited:

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
There are cases where a right turner has to turn into a multiple-lane road and then turn left in a very short distance. In most states it is not illegal for a right tuner making a turn into a middle or left lane and a left-turner must yield to that choice. Sorry, but it is illegal for a left-turner to turn concurrently with someone turning right onto a multiple lane road and in the case of an accident the person making the left turn will nearly always get the ticket for failure to yield the right of way. There are exceptions and it all depends on state laws, local roads, and local signs.

:thumbsup: This is the correct answer. Right turn driver has the right of way over left turn driver. Left turn driver must yield to oncoming traffic.
 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
78,868
368
136

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
:thumbsup: This is the correct answer. Right turn driver has the right of way over left turn driver. Left turn driver must yield to oncoming traffic.

There was no oncoming traffic to the left turn.
They were in the intersection and being the oncoming traffic.

The left turn had to have started before the right turn. The right turn should have noticed the left turn vehicle was already in the intersection. Therefore the left turn was oncoming traffic.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Generally, right turner always has the right of way in this case. Also, almost universally the left turner can not legally be in the intersection until the full way is clear. Hanging out in the intersection is highly dangerous (imagine an oncoming car from any direction with failing breaks, the one hanging out there is now dead). Or imagine an emergency vehicle from any direction, the left turner is now blocking it. Thus it is generally illegal to hang out there as a left turner.

Where was anything in the OP stating the left turn was hanging out in the intersection? Did I miss it are assumptions replacing facts?


The light has turned yellow and two cars turn into adjacent lanes. One makes a right turn and the other makes a left turn. The left-turning car is already in the intersection when the light turns yellow, and is first in line to turn left. The right-turning car is approaching the end of the right-turn lane and may or may not be able to stop in time for the yellow. [/N]The two cars then collide in the process of making the turn as one or both cars cross over into the adjacent lane.


If anything, a vehicle making a right turn had better be able to stop at the intersection to ensure that it is clear before proceeding. They do not have to, but otherwise they are not diving safely and risk losing control on the turn.
 
Last edited:

olds

Elite Member
Mar 3, 2000
50,102
772
126
You guys are fucking geniuses because I can't understand the OP or the picture. Bravo.
 

JulesMaximus

No Lifer
Jul 3, 2003
74,544
924
126
There was no oncoming traffic to the left turn.
They were in the intersection and being the oncoming traffic.

The left turn had to have started before the right turn. The right turn should have noticed the left turn vehicle was already in the intersection. Therefore the left turn was oncoming traffic.

Except for the right turn driver. That is the oncoming traffic.
 

edro

Lifer
Apr 5, 2002
24,326
68
91
IMO, Right turn trumps left turn in this situation.
It is a common situation though.

Both cars want to beat the yellow light, but the right turn has right of way.
 
Feb 25, 2011
16,986
1,617
126
Whichever car crossed the lane is who is at fault.

This.

If you are the right turn car you are supposed to "stay as close as practical to the curb". SO stay in the right lane. If you are the left hand turn....the rule is written annoyingly but basically stay as close to the center line as possible (ie left lane).

"First available legal lane" was drilled into my head in Drivers' Ed.
 

gorobei

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2007
3,924
1,406
136
Where was anything in the OP stating the left turn was hanging out in the intersection? Did I miss it are assumptions replacing facts?


If anything, a vehicle making a right turn had better be able to stop at the intersection to ensure that it is clear before proceeding. They do not have to, but otherwise they are not diving safely and risk losing control on the turn.

the OP's scenario is missing some information so he needs to fill in the details.
-had left turner(should be identified as vehicle 1 or A) entered the intersection past the limit line was stopped in the intersection when the light turned yellow?
-had vehicle1 begun his turn before vehicle2 began his right turn?

in California

the laws require any turning vehicle to stay in the nearest lane to the side of the road they are entering from[unless there are specifically marked turning lane lines]. In this case of a 2 lane road, a left turning vehicle would have to stay in lane 1(lane nearest the median). a right turning vehicle would have to turn onto lane2(the lane nearest the curb).
any car approaching an intersection is required to yield to any car already in the intersection.

based on the OP's incomplete description i would cite both drivers for either sloppy turn and/or unsafe lane change. the driver vehicle2 would also be cited for unsafe speed and/or failure to yield to the yellow light.

driver1 made an illegal turn in that he didnt stay in lane 1 and crossed into lane 2. the correct action would have been to turn onto lane 1 and proceed straight and then make a lane change when safe.

driver 2 was approaching a stale green, if he cant make a clean right turn onto lane 2 without encroaching into lane 1 then he was going too fast. if he cant react in time to avoid the other car, then he was going too fast.

this is contingent on CA law giving right of way to any vehicle already in the intersection. since both vehicles were making turns onto separate lanes of the same road, they are both at fault for not staying in their respective lanes. there shouldnt have been any contact if both drivers were driving as prescribed by CVC.

everyone makes wide turns onto lanes that arent the closest to the side they entered on, doesnt make it legal and therefore there is no legal expectation of other drivers to anticipate that maneuver from from you.
 

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
There was no oncoming traffic to the left turn.
They were in the intersection and being the oncoming traffic.

The left turn had to have started before the right turn. The right turn should have noticed the left turn vehicle was already in the intersection. Therefore the left turn was oncoming traffic.

Except for the right turn driver. That is the oncoming traffic.
Left turn was in intersection first.
That generates the right way. The right turn is supposed to clear and go. Such was not done.
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
There was no oncoming traffic to the left turn.
They were in the intersection and being the oncoming traffic.

The left turn had to have started before the right turn. The right turn should have noticed the left turn vehicle was already in the intersection. Therefore the left turn was oncoming traffic.

Um, I'm not sure where you learned to drive, but the right turning car IS oncoming traffic to the left turning car.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
Since the light was turning from yellow to red, if it turned red while you were in the intersection you are given instant right of way.
 

OverVolt

Lifer
Aug 31, 2002
14,278
89
91
You guys are fucking geniuses because I can't understand the OP or the picture. Bravo.

Haha, you know when you are making a left turn onto a two lane road and someone else is making a right from the opposite direction onto the same road, and they both try to go at once and just use different lanes? (The one closest to them)

I generally don't do that as I find it risky but whatever. Apparently guy turning right thought the guy turning left would yield. Guy making the right wanted the left lane and guy turning into the left lane thought the guy turning right would take the right lane, and bang. If I was turning left and a douche was turning right from the opposite side I would yield if I had the time to not get hit by the traffic because I don't trust them to take the right lane and me the left lane without fucking up. Which is what happened here. I generally have us at minimum make the turn asynchronously so if he takes the wrong lane it is more like a zipper effect and not a car crash effect.

I've had it happen several times where I miss a car by a couple inches because they turned into whatever lane they wanted instead of the one they were supposed to take. It might be annoying to be giving a moron like that room so he can pull his maneuvers but at least I don't have to swap insurance information with said moron.
 
Last edited:

EagleKeeper

Discussion Club Moderator<br>Elite Member
Staff member
Oct 30, 2000
42,589
5
0
Um, I'm not sure where you learned to drive, but the right turning car IS oncoming traffic to the left turning car.

And the left turn was in the intersection prior to the right coming to the intersection. Otherwise, they would not intersect.

The right turn had to be at least 20-30 ft from the cross walk at the time the left turn entered intersection. Left turn was making the turn. Right turn should have seen him as he approached. However. RT was concentrating on making his turn without stopping, ignoring other traffic.
 

Imp

Lifer
Feb 8, 2000
18,828
184
106
Another way of looking at this is the right-turner, if a dick, could say that he couldn't safely stop in time for the orange, so was going to be proceeding through the intersection. Instead, left-turner cut him off, so he swerved right.

Considering how often people do NOT signal, I'd have assumed the above scenario as the left-turner and yielded while douchely blocking traffic in the cross-direction. Here, traffic should have to yield to cars already in the intersection even if their light turns green.
 

LikeLinus

Lifer
Jul 25, 2001
11,518
670
126
And the left turn was in the intersection prior to the right coming to the intersection. Otherwise, they would not intersect.

The right turn had to be at least 20-30 ft from the cross walk at the time the left turn entered intersection. Left turn was making the turn. Right turn should have seen him as he approached. However. RT was concentrating on making his turn without stopping, ignoring other traffic.

Being first has nothing to do with anything. I'm not sure how you're not able to clearly tell that a Left turning car has to turn across a lane(s) of traffic with a car oncoming in one of those lanes. It is completely irrelevant if that car is turning right or going straight, that Right turning car has the right of way. If there is no green arrow, it has to yield on the green light for any oncoming traffic since it is crossing against those lanes. Just because you get there first and you sit there does not give you the ability to cut across said oncoming traffic.

There is a reason why they have to post signs like this...

http://174.120.28.167/images/R10-12.gif
 

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Um, I'm not sure where you learned to drive, but the right turning car IS oncoming traffic to the left turning car.
Think about it. The guy turning left had to be there first. He had to cross the intersection before the other guy started turning right. Go get out your matchbox cars, and draw a diagram of such an intersection. Once half way through his turn, the guy turning left had the right of way; the guy turning right would have been just arriving at the intersection.

And, though someone above claims that it varies by state - I've always been taught that you turn into the nearest (legal) lane. (You don't turn into, say, a bike lane.)
 

dullard

Elite Member
May 21, 2001
25,781
4,318
126
Think about it. The guy turning left had to be there first. He had to cross the intersection before the other guy started turning right. Go get out your matchbox cars, and draw a diagram of such an intersection. Once half way through his turn, the guy turning left had the right of way; the guy turning right would have been just arriving at the intersection.
Think about it. Suppose the car turning right instead just decided to go straight. Bang, the left turning car just turned directly into a car which was legally going straight. The left turning car should yield (out of the intersection) until all oncoming traffic is clear.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |