Originally posted by: Agamar
Any of the cheap routers will still give you top speed with only a DSL connection.
Thanks! I think I've pretty much decided just to go with the best deal on a mid range (not the cheapest of the cheap aka around $42) router I can find.Originally posted by: JackMDS
If you are willing to spend few hundreds $$$ there are more reliable Routers.
If you are looking at the sub $100 Cable/DSL Router?
It Does Not Matter. The main deference is the Color of the Plastic casing.
However there might be functional differences between the models, like the number of Ports that can be opened.
So, log to the support Sites of SMC, Netgear, D-Link, Buffalo, Linksys, etc. Down load the manuals, read and choose what ever fit your personal needs.
About Routers: Cable/DSL Routers - NAT & Ports.
:sun:
Originally posted by: loki8481
they're really all the same.
I'd recomend Netgear, as Linksys products look like sh!t, but it's just a personal preference.
Originally posted by: JackMDS
LOL.
So by now we know that some people here like Linksys, some like Netgear, some like smoothwall, some like something else.
This week I like Buffalo ! Why?
I got one that is doing 802.11g it can function as WDS, and it WZC compatible.
$19.99 after rebate.
Next week who knows?
Ergo it Does Not Matter.:shocked:
:sun:
Originally posted by: cmetz
bdjohnson, all of the SOHO networking vendors are hit or miss. Some of their prodcuts have been great and some have been real duds (and many start out as duds and mature into great over the course of a year or more).
Linksys's WRT54G/GS is a pretty good unit these days, and the hacked firmware gives it a lot longer viable life than most because it can continue to get updated by the community even after Linksys moves on.
Linksys's BEFSR41 is an old solid performer.
Check dslreports.com's forums for horror stories about particular products, but in general if your needs are just for a basic PAT firewall/router, any of them should work fine - get the cheapest one that week.