ivwshane
Lifer
- May 15, 2000
- 33,257
- 16,578
- 136
How do you know it's not you who's schizophrenic?
What about my reality isn't correct?
How do you know it's not you who's schizophrenic?
Data can be manipulated but you have to look at the facts. Has it happened before? What measures are taken to safeguard the numbers? What evidence is there of tampering?
You have nothing.
What data would you like me to post? I'm happy to provide sources.
What about my reality isn't correct?
What evidence is there that the numbers you are relying on are credible, accurate, and free of tampering?
Likewise.
Sure, let's see your government sources. They're responsible for your reality, right? Whatever they say must be correct, right?
LOL.
"But, but, but... yes the politicians are dependent on wealthy people and corporations to get elected, but, but, but, once they do get elected, they act independently of those wealthy people and corporations and instead serve the interests of the peasantry! Anybody who says otherwise is schizophobic!".
LOL.
Lol you are asking me to prove a negative, it's akin to saying god exists because you can't prove he doesn't exist. Sorry the onus is on you.
I want data proving that these numbers are accurate and credible. Do you have any?I'm on my phone so which data would you like? Unemployment rate? Inflation rate? GDP growth?
Lol no. Anyone who thinks all politicians are like that is schizophrenic.
So you believe that certain politicians - primarily of the Democratic persuasion - who are dependent on wealthy people and corporations to get elected, once elected, turn their backs on those wealthy people and corporations to serve the interests of the peasants?
What do you base this belief on? What evidence supports this belief?
Tell that to the millions of people who get to stay on their parents healthcare until age 26. Tell that to the millions of Americans who no longer have to worry about lifetime caps on their insurance coverage. Tell that to the millions of Americans who can now get healthcare even though they have pre existing conditions. Tell that to the hundreds of thousands veterans that will be positively impacted by the Honoring Americas Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012. Tell that to the millions of Americans whose homes were under water and were able to refinance at lower interest rates. Tell that to the hundreds of thousands if not millions of workers that were positively impacted by auto bailouts. Tell that to the 300K teachers whose jobs were saved via the ARRA. Tell that to the thousands of soldiers who no longer have to worry about being kicked out of the military for being gay. Tell that to the millions of women who no will be paid equally for doing the same job a man does. Tell that to the millions of same sex couples who can now visit their loved ones in the hospital. Tell that to the millions of students who will now have lower interest rates on their student loans.
But yeah, Obama, like Romney has only worked for the top 1%.
You should look in the mirror and you will really see who is delusional.
Oh and by the way, that's only a small list of things dems and the president have done to help the middle class.
Onus probandi from Latin "onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit, non ei qui negat" the burden of proof is on the person who makes the claim, not on the person who denies (or questions the claim). It is a particular case of the "argumentum ad ignorantiam" fallacy, here the burden is shifted on the person defending against the assertion
Oh I don't know maybe the fact that I already showed you my proof of things congress and the president has done that help ordinary citizens and in some cases hurt those 1 percenters.
Again, you made the claim now back it up or GTFO!
Oh here you go:
http://inflationdata.com/inflation/Inflation_Rate/HistoricalInflation.aspx
I'm still waiting for your "facts".
Sorry, but the BLS has been changing the way the CPI is computed for years. According to Shadow Stats, inflation is much higher than what the government claims:
http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts
The government fudges the numbers to make inflation look lower than it really is.
Chris Martenson covered this in his series of "Crash Course" videos:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPkTItOXuN0
What else you got?
You didn't disprove anything look at the revised charts numbers and you will see Obamas inflation numbers are approaching Clinton's.
What else do you have because you still haven't proven shit.
LOL. Clinton entered office in 1993, and according to Shadow Stats, the inflation rate at that time, based on the older method for computing the CPI, was around 5%. By the time Clinton left office in 2001, inflation was around 8%.
Obama's already seen inflation rates above 10% during his first term, and with QE Infinity priming the printing press pump, we'll probably see inflation spike even higher in the near future.
You're not dealing in reality, pal. This is reality:
Where is the inflation at now dumbass?
U mad, bro? You sound mad.
LOL.
Current inflation is around 2%
Yeah, dude needs help!Positive symptoms are psychotic behaviors not seen in healthy people. People with positive symptoms often "lose touch" with reality. These symptoms can come and go. Sometimes they are severe and at other times hardly noticeable, depending on whether the individual is receiving treatment. They include the following:
Delusions are false beliefs that are not part of the person's culture and do not change. The person believes delusions even after other people prove that the beliefs are not true or logical.
Thought disorders are unusual or dysfunctional ways of thinking. One form of thought disorder is called "disorganized thinking." This is when a person has trouble organizing his or her thoughts or connecting them logically
Current inflation is around 2%
I am starting to get upset that you are wasting my time.
Obama 'believed he had BEATEN Romney' in Denver debate - after ignoring advice of top aides on preparation
Obama believes he'd got the better of Romney as he walked off stage to the dismay of his aides, according to a Democrat close to the campaign
The President failed to prepare properly, opting instead to visit the Hoover Dam the day before the showdown
Democrat claims he was so disdainful of Romney that he didn't think he needed to even engage with him
Had one-liners on 47% prepared but chose not to use them
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...bate-ignoring-advice-aides.html#ixzz28q5nHCPp