why hasn't GWB been impeached?

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of unbiased journalism. I'm surprised that they stopped short of accusing GWB of personally ordering extradition.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

 

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

 

[mwtgg]

Originally posted by: ciba

Originally posted by: Infohawk
Because, like it or not, the impeachment process is pure politics. Not a sexy answer, but it's true. Republicans could let Bush get away with just about anything if they want to. The repugs impeached clinton for a bj. It's safe to say that if the dems were in power, Bush would be being investigated for his nefarious pre-meditated war plans.

I always thought it was for perjury. Maybe I'm wrong and BJs are actually a crime nowadays.

You forgot obstruction of justice, but I'll let that slide.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

 

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

 

[daclayman]

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

And what should we indict President Clinton for? What crimes did he commit?

Link?

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

Speaking of links, that's a good one.

:thumbsup:

 

[wavshrdr]

Originally posted by: Infohawk

Originally posted by: AnyMal
what crimes?

Misleading a country into a war on false pretenses.

If I follow your incorrect logic on this, then Presidents Johnson and JFK should have both been impeached! Why didn't the Dems complain about war when every time WJC got caught with his zipper down some poor a$$ country got bombed. When I was in Germany during WJC was prez, it was a running joke. Each time there was a headline about Bill in a sexual tryst the Germans knew someone was going to get bombed!

All of you GW haters who said GW went to war with Iraq on false pretenses need to grow up. Even your sacred WJC thought that Saddam had WMD's and GW relied on this faulty info as much as WJC did! I don't love GW but I try to be fair about all of the presidents because like them or hate them, they are still our presidents. We need to show unity at time of war. Don't undermine the effort. Sure, revisit the issue when it was done but if we don't finish it now it will be much worse later!!! Don't forget that. If this goes badly it will affect us as a country for at least the next 50-100 years so save your Monday morning quarterbacking UNTIL AFTER THE GAME. Then lets have an honest non-political discourse and investigation and see what went wrong. WJC had faulty intel and so did GW so why SOLELY blame GW. At least have some intellectual honesty!!!!

Clinton was sent for impeachment because he violated on of the most sacred rights in the US; he lied under oath and because of that deprived another person of Due Process. By lying under oath, the prevented a case from being brought against him and thereby depriving another person of their fundamental rights. This from the highest law enforcement person in the US.

I don't care that he got a bj from some tramp or used a cigar as depth gauge. Although I do think that does put the US at risk. How do we know that while Bill was out Tom Cattin' around that he could have picked up an STD and became as whacked as Hitler? How do we know that maybe during pillow talk he didn't let go with a few state secrets? I am not so wound up about these issues though they do have merit as much as lying under oath. That is totally despicable and they SOB should have gone to jail! If GW did that I'd say the same thing.

 

[BBond]

So in other words bush reused years old intel to justify an unnecesary, unprovoked invasion of a country that we are now stuck in for a decade or more at an ever escalating human and financial price.

It goes badly because bush planned and executed it badly.

And haven't you heard about the Downing Street memo yet? Bush and Blair plotted the entire thing, they fit the intel to their agenda on purpose.

WTFU.

 

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

And what should we indict President Clinton for? What crimes did he commit?

Link?

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

Speaking of links, that's a good one.

:thumbsup:

I'm not surprised. Let me help you. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda. In case you forgot, these are the countris where genocide took place while Clinton chose to ignore it. He only got involved when it was too late and made a half-assed effort at that.

 

[EagleKeeper]

Clinton was impeached for lying under oath.

Had nothing to do with what he actually did sexually in the Whitehouse, but was the fact of the lying under oath to cover it up.

It was a political vendetta and he compounded the issue by perjury.

Had he not done so, there would have been no grounds for an impeachment charge.

Political mudslinging and embaressing stories would have been all that happened.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

And what should we indict President Clinton for? What crimes did he commit?

Link?

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

Speaking of links, that's a good one.

:thumbsup:

I'm not surprised. Let me help you. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda. In case you forgot, these are the countris where genocide took place while Clinton chose to ignore it. He only got involved when it was too late and made a half-assed effort at that.

Oh, so we can impeach bush for Sudan then, right?

 

[Ozoned]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

And what should we indict President Clinton for? What crimes did he commit?

Link?

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

Speaking of links, that's a good one.

:thumbsup:

I'm not surprised. Let me help you. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda. In case you forgot, these are the countris where genocide took place while Clinton chose to ignore it. He only got involved when it was too late and made a half-assed effort at that.

Oh, so we can impeach bush for Sudan then, right?

Wrong. All we can do is whine and bitch about Bush because we belong to the party of the irrelevant.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Ozoned

Wrong. All we can do is whine and bitch about Bush because we belong to the party of the irrelevant.

I'm used to you making no sense whatsoever, but that is even less sense than usual.

 

[AnyMal]

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond

Originally posted by: AnyMal

Originally posted by: BBond
Link

Yeah, The New Yorker is a good source of ubiased journalism.

You asked for a link. There it is. Are you claiming it's a lie?

LINK?

I am claiming that The New Yorker is a liberal cesspool that will never publish anything that may portray Republicans in a positive light.

Uh huh. Right. Only Bush tells the truth. Everyone else is lying.

Would you prefer CBS?

Or are they liars and a "liberal cesspool" too?

BTW, the only true cesspool in America is at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.

I tell you what. You start a grassroots effort to have Clinton indited for high crimes. Once it's done, we'll look into GWB situation. Let's keep it consistent, shall we?

And what should we indict President Clinton for? What crimes did he commit?

Link?

Obstruction of justice? He lied to save his marriage or whatever reason. Some of should realign your gray matter:

hhhmmmm

GWB won't be held accountable because his party control's the Senate. /thread

Speaking of links, that's a good one.

:thumbsup:

I'm not surprised. Let me help you. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Somalia, Rwanda. In case you forgot, these are the countris where genocide took place while Clinton chose to ignore it. He only got involved when it was too late and made a half-assed effort at that.

Oh, so we can impeach bush for Sudan then, right?

Let me help you again.

Link 1

Link 2

Link 3

Link 4

Link 5

Will this be enough for now?

 

[BBond]

People in Sudan are feeding their children leaves from trees in a futile attempt to stave off starvation.

They say that talk is cheap.

When bush talks about Sudan, it's worthless.

Bush says Sudan must make peace

WTF? That and a dollar will get you a bus ride.

The Aug. 3 news story "Evangelicals Urge Bush to Do More for Sudan" suggested that evangelicals are exerting political pressure on a reluctant White House. Not so.

Another dollar. Another ride.

Bush urges Sudan to sign peace deal

More bullsh!t. Why doesn't bush drop some MREs for those starving children in Sudan. NO OIL???

 

[tommywishbone]

W should absolutely be impeached, then beaten, then sent to live in Faluja or some other Iraqi hell he has created.

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: tommywishbone
W should absolutely be impeached, then beaten, then sent to live in Faluja or some other Iraqi hell he has created.

Send him and the rest of his accomplises to Abu Ghraib via extraordinary rendition. And let the prisoners that were tortured there be his jailers.

 

[wavshrdr]

I just don't understand some of your irrationaly hatred for GW. I am not the world's biggest GW supporter but I can't say that WJC was a standout president that is for sure. The same people who don't want to fund the military are the same ones who want us to play world's policemen everywhere.

Why on earth should we play the world's policeman? It is a thankless job and no one appreciates it anyway. Germany, France, Italy and the rest of the EU don't want to help. They ONLY help when it is in their own national interests. Frankly that is what we need to do as well. IF we then have money and time left over then maybe look at some of the other places.

The UN is a worthless piece of crap just in existence to keep dictators in power. No one complains when ANY world POWER doesn't help except when it is US that doesn't help. Where is all the outcry that China isn't spending more money to help or Russia or France or Germany? Why is it the US' responsibility to correct the problems in the Sudan. I didn't want GW for president but I sure as heck didn't want that sell out to the UN Mr. Heinz (John Kerry) to be president either. Why isn't there any backlash agains Russia doing thing unilaterally? You know why? Because Putin doesn't give a rat's a$$ what anyone else thinks. He plays the UN like a violin when it benefits him. Just look at the oil for food scandal. If anyone thinks we need to put our trust in an organization like that seriously needs to delve into what the UN really does.

As for a previous poster's comment about intel being old sometime old intel is all you have. Even Saddam wanted us to believe he had WMDs and did everything he could to prop up that image. Even Mr. Putin's intel said that Saddam was a threat and that he had WMD's even as the bastard Russians continuted to illegally sell weapons and jammers to Saddam. Talk about playing both sides of the isle. Mr. Putin did a great job on that one! But where is all the outcry from the Dems about him or any other world leader. If all you you who irrationally hate or despise GW would look around at other world leaders maybe you would realize that while he isn't a prince he sure isn't the toad Chirac is! No country in the world gives as much money or help to the rest of the world as the US does! Not just to areas that are directly in our national interest either. No other party in the history of the US has worked so hard to destroy the reputation of the US on the world stage as the Dems have done just to try and benefit themselves politically internally. I don't care if the rest of the world wouldn't have voted for GW. They don't elect our president and I sure wouldn't have voted for Chirac or Putin if I lived in their countries.

Some of you folks need to get out and travel and see how the rest of the world really is and not how our media portrays it to be. You tend to believe all the BS they feed you as if it were the holy verse from whatever god you believe in (if you do believe in one). It is not the end of the world that GW is president. Get a grip. I survived 8 years of Clinton, Carter's inept foreign policy, high taxes and absurd interest rates, bumbling Ford even Nixon and Johnson and JFK. The only president I felt truly made a positive difference in the past 40 years was Reagan.

 

[BBond]

The military was underfunded by the Republicans. Dick Cheney started the downsizing. Ask him. He's admitted it and it's been posted here at P&N.

The UN is what its member nations make it. Especially its permanent Security Council members.

Read the Downing Street memo and you'll change your mind about that Iraq intel. Unless you're completely blind.

What positive difference did Reagan make? Iran Contra? Drugs for US cities, missiles for Iran? The Savings and Loan debacle? Record deficits (before bush came along anyway).

 

[BBond]

This is what bush does with people who supply him with bad intel. Because he asks for bad intel.

WTFU.

Awards for analysts behind Iraq finding

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Two U.S. Army analysts whose work was cited as part of a key intelligence failure on Iraq have received job performance awards for the past three years, The Washington Post reported on Saturday.

The civilian analysts work at the Army's National Ground Intelligence Center, an agency criticized by President Bush's commission investigating U.S. intelligence.

Ahead of the U.S. attack on Iraq, the analysts concluded it was unlikely that aluminum tubes sought by Baghdad were for use in Iraq's rocket arsenal. The Bush administration used that finding as evidence that Saddam Hussein was rebuilding Iraq's nuclear weapons program, the paper said.

The intelligence commission said the analysts failed to seek or get information from the Energy Department and elsewhere indicating the tubes were the kind used as rocket-motor cases by the Iraqi military.

A Pentagon spokesman said the awards to the analysts were to recognize their overall contributions on the job.

But some unnamed current and formal officials said granting such awards shows how the administration has not held people accountable for mistakes on prewar intelligence, the paper wrote.

Maybe next he'll give them the Medal of Freedom. After all, if Tenet, Franks, and Bremer deserves one, anyone does.

 

[Kadarin]

He didn't get impeached because he didn't do anything sexually outrageous. People tend to flip out at that sort of thing...

 

[BBond]

Originally posted by: Astaroth33
He didn't get impeached because he didn't do anything sexually outrageous. People tend to flip out at that sort of thing...

Yet bush's lies that lead to the murder of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians barely even gets their attention.

 

[wavshrdr]

Originally posted by: BBond
The military was underfunded by the Republicans. Dick Cheney started the downsizing. Ask him. He's admitted it and it's been posted here at P&N.

The UN is what its member nations make it. Especially its permanent Security Council members.

Read the Downing Street memo and you'll change your mind about that Iraq intel. Unless you're completely blind.

What positive difference did Reagan make? Iran Contra? Drugs for US cities, missiles for Iran? The Savings and Loan debacle? Record deficits (before bush came along anyway).

Reagan did introduce the 401k plan which has been almost directly responsible for our continued growth as a nation. People tend to forget that there is inertia that must be overcome with any change. Effects are not immediately obvious when changes are made in government. Just like Clinton inherited a booming economy as he sure didn't create and by the time he left it was already going down well before 911. High taxes do not contribute to economic growth. If JFK were alive now he'd be a Republican on fiscal issues.

Reagan did have a big impact on the breakup of the Cold War and the FSU. This ultimately should have allowed us to reduce defense spending in some areas and/or shift money to redefine the new battles that would take place. Sadly most presidents have bungled this issue but not only presidents are to blame but Congress as well. The Dems have controlled Congress for much of the past 40 years aside from the little stint of the Repubs in the 90's. People like to lay the blame on the President but Congress has more skin in the game and people quickly forget that!