imported_Papi
Platinum Member
- Nov 15, 2002
- 2,413
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
It wouldn't have happened if he weren't high. The other reasons that these things happen, like driving drunk, are currently illegal and it happens anyway. I realize that. But why legalize something so dangerous just because people will do it anyway?Originally posted by: skace Guess what FFM, what you witnessed will happen, whether pot is legal or illegal. This is the world we live in. It will happen everyday, somewhere, somehow. And you know what else? Even worse things will happen. You cannot baby proof the world.
So that those of us who don't kill people will be able to enjoy it. Everything in this world can be dangerous if used incorrectly or abused. Yet we do not deprive those who do not misuse of it. It is also well known that the more you deprive someone of something, the greater their urge to abuse it.
Although I don't believe in destiny to the full effect, it is most likely that: had your uncle never found pot, he would have found something equally bad to do and ended up the same way.
Originally posted by: Jzero
Originally posted by: yayo
It's not in Toronto
Yeah, but....it's Toronto....
Originally posted by: Electric Amish
Originally posted by: yayo
It's not in Toronto
Show off!
Originally posted by: yayo
water can kill me? OMG what are the side effect?
I have to pee a lot......
Originally posted by: yayo
water can kill me? OMG what are the side effect? I have to pee a lot......
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: yayo
water can kill me? OMG what are the side effect? I have to pee a lot......
It is called drowning genious.
Originally posted by: Eli
LOL!Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
It's not as easily available to the average joe who doesn't know sh|t about where to look to get it. That was my point. Any moron can go buy beer at the local store. It's not as easy to buy marajuana. At least, around here it's not.
Sorry to trounce on you and stuff, but Oregon is well known for being a cannabis mecca. I could probably locate some in about 15 minutes.
Oh, and probably contrary to popular belief here.. I'm not currently smoking. I quit over 2 months ago, cold turkey, no problems.. because I need to find a job and I don't want a drug test to screw up anything I get lined up.
Ugh. Drug tests.. nah. That's a whole 'nother thread.
Originally posted by: Ynog
http://www.earthgreen.org/hemp.htm
But in the early 1900?s, as the paper industry grew, it came to a crossroads, needing to choose between hemp and trees as its primary source of pulp. If the hemp plant was chosen, the logging industry would be threatened with financial ruin.
William Hearst, owner of a large timber company and many newspapers printed from tree-derived paper, started a campaign to stop hemp. He filled his newspapers with stories portraying hemp as a drug used by ?criminals and minorities.? Hearst used the Mexican slang word ?marijuana? instead if ?hemp? to help change its image from the all-American plant to an evil drug ?used by minorities. Hearst was joined by Du Pont and several other companies that saw a potential for profit in outlawing hemp. For Hearst and his enormous timber company, making hemp illegal was attractive because it guaranteed an enormous market for paper made from wood. For Du Pont, making hemp illegal would eliminate the stiffest competition for the company?s new synthetic fabrics, such as nylon. Because of their efforts, people became afraid of this ?dangerous drug,? and hemp became illegal. In the process, many potential benefits to our society were also lost.
The fact that some forms of the hemp plant also produce a psychoactive substance (THC) should not blind us to the tremendous benefits this plant can provide. Hemp can be grown without any THC, making it pharmacologically inert and completely undesirable to smoke.
Edit: Forgot the link
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
most of fmcobalts objections with marijana also apply to religion which he so deeply loves. religion can be a very dangerous thing as we all know. its funny fmmcobalt isn't for making it illegal. its just consistency we want you know.
Originally posted by: Beau
I've probably done more drugs than most people on this board, I still strongly support their being illegal.
Originally posted by: Vic
As a police officer, Rogue, you have a vested financial interest in maintaining drug prohibition. Therefore, any argument you would make here is worthless.Originally posted by: Rogue
You're absolutely right! But why provide already stupid people with just another reason to add to a pre-existing condition?Originally posted by: Vic
Actually the real problem is that most of America has been effectively brainwashed into forgetting that people do dumb sht!t even without the assistance of drugs.Originally posted by: Rogue
The problem with your entire story is that guys like you can't smoke a tree and do dumb $hit, so it was probably a good decision in the end.
Originally posted by: N8Magic
Originally posted by: Beau
Originally posted by: Vic
As a police officer, Rogue, you have a vested financial interest in maintaining drug prohibition. Therefore, any argument you would make here is worthless.Originally posted by: Rogue
You're absolutely right! But why provide already stupid people with just another reason to add to a pre-existing condition?Originally posted by: Vic
Actually the real problem is that most of America has been effectively brainwashed into forgetting that people do dumb sht!t even without the assistance of drugs.Originally posted by: Rogue
The problem with your entire story is that guys like you can't smoke a tree and do dumb $hit, so it was probably a good decision in the end.
Actually, his opinions are worth exponentially more than yours, considering he is submitted to the consequences of users on a daily basis.
Unfortunately, they are not.
As a Police Officer, Rogue gets somewhat of a skewed view of things. He has to clean up the mess that irresponsible people make every day. What about the millions of people that use marijuana that DON'T cause any problems? I'd be willing to wager that in any given year, Rogue deals with far more abusive and violent drunks than he does potheads.
And yes, he does have a vested interest in keeping marijuana illegal. Think about how much money gets poured into police budgets every year courtesy of the "war on drugs". If that money disappears, the police department will be forced to lay off staff, threatening his job.
Originally posted by: Beau
Jebus... move to Toronto and STFU.
It impairs your consciousness to an unsafe level, nuff said.
Originally posted by: Ynog
http://www.earthgreen.org/hemp.htm
But in the early 1900?s, as the paper industry grew, it came to a crossroads, needing to choose between hemp and trees as its primary source of pulp. If the hemp plant was chosen, the logging industry would be threatened with financial ruin.
William Hearst, owner of a large timber company and many newspapers printed from tree-derived paper, started a campaign to stop hemp. He filled his newspapers with stories portraying hemp as a drug used by ?criminals and minorities.? Hearst used the Mexican slang word ?marijuana? instead if ?hemp? to help change its image from the all-American plant to an evil drug ?used by minorities. Hearst was joined by Du Pont and several other companies that saw a potential for profit in outlawing hemp. For Hearst and his enormous timber company, making hemp illegal was attractive because it guaranteed an enormous market for paper made from wood. For Du Pont, making hemp illegal would eliminate the stiffest competition for the company?s new synthetic fabrics, such as nylon. Because of their efforts, people became afraid of this ?dangerous drug,? and hemp became illegal. In the process, many potential benefits to our society were also lost.
The fact that some forms of the hemp plant also produce a psychoactive substance (THC) should not blind us to the tremendous benefits this plant can provide. Hemp can be grown without any THC, making it pharmacologically inert and completely undesirable to smoke.
Edit: Forgot the link
Originally posted by: royaldank
DuPont and old fashioned politicians. Pretty soon we are going to be just about the only industrialized world that still considers pot illegal. Canada and most of Europe have decriminilized it for the most part.
It's something fun to do. It can impair judgement, but not nearly as much as alcohol. Why would someone do it? Because it can be fun. No one has ever overdosed from marijuana. Driving under the influence could be a problem, but not nearly as much as alcohol.
Alcohol is much more of a society problem than pot.
Originally posted by: bittersweet81
WHY??????????????????????????????????????????????
I don't get it.
Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Originally posted by: Vic
Neither does someone smoking weed in their own home put anyones life in jeopardy. Your point?Originally posted by: FFMCobalt
Farting in a public place hardly puts lives in jeopardy.Originally posted by: Beau
Explain to me what my kind is?Originally posted by: Vic
Driving while talking on cellphones is only illegal in very rare places, and not where I live. Plus, that wasn't my point and you know that. Hey, you got your position to defend. You think you can legislate a perfect world. The problem is that you are completely and foolishly wrong. You only make the world worse. But hey, I know your kind. When do you push for legislation to make it illegal to fart in a public place?
People under the effects of pot can LEAVE their homes and yards. Jesus! Where the hell is your logic? You're almost as bad at reasoning as the potheads. People who are high on pot do not reason well. The do STUPID THINGS. They run the risk of leaving their humble abode and killing others, potentially.
So either lobby for all of this crap to be illegal and deal with a safer society (ooo, that's gonna be hard), or lobby for all this crap to be legal and deal with a worse society.
I choose a better society.