Jared Loughner is relevant to show that you probably only reserve judgment for people you sympathize with. Should everyone stop discussing Loughner because he hasn't had a trial yet? Of course not. Nobody's saying he doesn't deserve a trial but at the same time it's in the bag that he's guilty. Same goes for your butt-buddy.
Again, nobody is saying that Manning doesn't deserve a trial, dimwit.
Did I mention him? no
Have I posted about him? no
So you actually have no idea what I think do you? Of course not
I don't care whether Manning is guilty or not. I care about the law being followed. He should be treated like any other accused criminal, and its blatantly obvious that he isn't. If he is guilty, and there is proof of guilt, it will come out in his trial. That's called justice.
Can anyone post a link to any other military servicemen that have been locked in solitary confinement and treated this poorly, when they have not been convicted of ANYTHING, and are still considered innocent?
If you can't post links to the above, how on earth do you justify this? Secret knowledge that only you know? General hatred for the guy?
As to not deserving a trial, you obviously haven't read all these posts. People are saying he is getting what he deserves. Someone posted that they think he is already guilty. So yea, lots of people are already ready to lock him away and throw away the key.
Just like all those "terrorists" in Gitmo. Once called a terrorist, just lock them up forever. No proof, no trial, nothing. That sure is American justice, not. Sound familiar?