Originally posted by: GreenMonkey
Yes of course. Minus the personal attacks. If I were Nvidia or ATI corporations, I would permanently lock cards at the advertised clock speeds and laser cut any pipelines not being utilized to avoid countless abusive RMA's. I have to admit, it's like they are asking for it by not doing this.
There was no security at this store...none! Why didn't they put precautions in place? I admit, it's like they are asking to have stuff stolen but not doing this.
They should make an ethics class mandatory in public schools. At least then if you choose to do something questionably ethical, you don't make faulty justifications for why it is OK.
i'd make reading
comprehension mandatory.
:roll:
Your reply to this particular poster is WAY off. Try looking at "context".
:thumbsdown:
anyway, to reply to
keysplayr2003 . . . . i guess ati/intel/amd/nvidia etc. decide NOT to do this for a reason.
Actually, companies like to "have it both ways"; they like that then enthusiast
can O/C their product and it provides a form of post-testing and a "buzz" thru the enthusiast community. Many companys - Abit, Asus, etc. make a living by making o/c'ing-friendly MBs - if intel or amd did NOT like it, they could easily shut it down. AMD is also more "o/c'ing friendly" than intel as it caters to the enthusiasts.
ALSO, O/C'ing is allowed for - in certain cases even by intel - the 3% "turbo boost" was for diagnostic purposes.
ATI and nVidia both KNOW their product will be o/c'd . . . . some of their partners advertise O/Cs and a "reasonable range" of O/C'ing whill still being warrantied.
Here's one for your colorblind people (i.e. see only in B&W):
How about the person who gets a cpu/videocard and proceeds to test its limits - safetly and incrementally. It is only O/C'd for a benchmark and then put back to "stock". A year later, the MB fails and takes the videocard with it - is he morally able to RMA?
I wasted a lot of time with this post and realize very few (here) will get the point . . . . there ARE certain situations that are treated differently than others and it is not your conscience, nor do you likely know the WHOLE story - just what was written, perhaps quickly in a post and it is also not your position to judge . . . . although it is your privilege to object WITHOUT personally attacking the person you disaggree with.