sandorski
No Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 70,663
- 6,234
- 126
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Auric
I had very low expectations for Shoot 'Em Upand yet was still dissapointed. What a snooze fest.
I concur The Day After Tomorrow was also poor but more like just standard Hollywood poor rather than amongst the worst.
Transporter 2 was laughably bad also.
I am still trying to figure out a few things:
1. How does a barge get pushed straight down a street? How did it turn a corner?
2. How can you run away from cold?
3. How come cold air can't get through the cracks in a library door?
4. Why can't the cold air come down into the wendy's?
I am normally not a "wow this isn't realistic" type of guy...but this movie was just a bit too rediculous.
As for Shoot 'em up....I have no idea what they were going for. I guess it was supposed to be funny....but it wasn't at all.
1) dunno, would have to watch again to find out
2) It's not "cold" they are running from, but "cold air". Air flows like a liquid, you can avoid it
3) It probably did, just not in enough volume to have much effect. It's like being in a leaky boat, you don't fill up instantly just because some water is leaking in. Likewise some Cold Air going through the door wasn't going to have the same effect as what was occuring outside. They had a fire going to counteract it. Besides, with the amount of Frost/Ice that was building up everywhere, any small cracks would be sealed almost instantaneously.
4) not sure what you're talking about
Certainly the movie was rather fake. It kinda took some elements of the GW/GHG/GCC issue, then added a twist that no Scientist has ever suggested. I'm not even sure if the Airmass they used as the culprit even exists, although it probably does, I'm guessing. It was more an Action/Survival Movie rather than a GW/GHG/GCC movie and as an Action/Survival Movie I found it decently entertaining.