So unless the extra RAM will help much, I don't see why you would want to risk needing to OC when you can get a higher spec card (clock wise) for the same price....Oddly, this time around there are two $200 versions of the card. The X700 XT (which we are testing today) has 475/1.05 core/mem clocks and 128MB of RAM. The X700 Pro will launch with 420/864 core/mem clocks and 256MB of RAM
Originally posted by: nazardelrosario
I have the x700 pro just to let you know, I havent really done much overclocking on it, cause the lack thereof information on overclocking it. Ive overclocked it just a little bit not much, I migh overclock it more extensively, but I really plan on returning the card. But it is a good card, but I would prefere the 6600 gt. With the new beta drivers though im getting 50fps on doom 3 on the doom 3 test, so it's not bad.
Originally posted by: Computer MAn
are both the Pro and XT 128bit or is the XT 256bit.
Originally posted by: ronnn
beyond3d has a review up, here is the oc they got on a x700pro. Very different results from Anatech for the 9800 pro. (looking at anatechs review of the x700xt)
Originally posted by: gobucks
it looks like the XT is pretty much faster than the Pro. As for flashing, there is none - The pro is just an underclocked XT with 256MB. You could overclock, but I've heard that X700s don't have too much overclocking potential. All in all, if you're gonna get one, get the XT. However, I'd still recommend the 6600GT over them both - slightly better performance, better overclocking (600/1200 is pretty easy to do), and it has SLI and PS3.0. In fact, the XFX dual-DVI version runs a default of 500/1200, giving it almost as much memory bandwidth as a 6800, and only runs $187.