X800XTPE OR BGF 6800 Ultra

chadomaly

Member
Feb 12, 2003
142
0
0
agp is different than PCIE

Also they are screwing you on that price. Don't pay more than MSRP... I've heard that MSRP is $500
 

VisableAssassin

Senior member
Nov 12, 2001
767
0
0
Originally posted by: crleap
agp is different than PCIE

Also they are screwing you on that price. Don't pay more than MSRP... I've heard that MSRP is $500

yeah but supposedly the BFG cards have a tag due to the options they are offered with
cooling psu ETC.
granted even 5 bills is high priced...BFG has a warranty ill stand by everytime
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,938
6
81
You will have to buy a new card for a PCI_Express motherboard.
It would be better to use something cheap for now and then buy a PCI-Express card when you get the new motherboard.
 

EngenZerO

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2001
5,099
2
0
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.
 

KoRn96

Junior Member
May 16, 2004
23
0
0
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.

Me two i had a x800xt pre-order .
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.


Err, I don't know how you could have made "the biggest mistake":
1. There are no games a 6800U won't perform well enough on that you will miss the difference in performance of an X800XT
2. If you turn off the brilinear filtering that compromises IQ in some situations, the cards should be about equal
3. The impact of SM3 over the life of the card for you remains to be seen, and you wouldn't have it at all with the X800XT. ATI couldn't figure it out and is stuck with the limited features of DX9b, which they've had for 2 years.
 

EngenZerO

Diamond Member
Dec 24, 2001
5,099
2
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.


Err, I don't know how you could have made "the biggest mistake":
1. There are no games a 6800U won't perform well enough on that you will miss the difference in performance of an X800XT
2. If you turn off the brilinear filtering that compromises IQ in some situations, the cards should be about equal
3. The impact of SM3 over the life of the card for you remains to be seen, and you wouldn't have it at all with the X800XT. ATI couldn't figure it out and is stuck with the limited features of DX9b, which they've had for 2 years.


those were all factors that played into my mind when I switched my purchase. honestly, I am not regretting it so far, and I look foward to playing with my new toy soon,
 

Marsumane

Golden Member
Mar 9, 2004
1,171
0
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.


Err, I don't know how you could have made "the biggest mistake":
1. There are no games a 6800U won't perform well enough on that you will miss the difference in performance of an X800XT
2. If you turn off the brilinear filtering that compromises IQ in some situations, the cards should be about equal
3. The impact of SM3 over the life of the card for you remains to be seen, and you wouldn't have it at all with the X800XT. ATI couldn't figure it out and is stuck with the limited features of DX9b, which they've had for 2 years.

I dont think that they couldnt figure it out, its more that they cidnt bother figuring it out or started to work on it too late after finding nv having it already implemented in ther new cards. Afterall, ati expected nothing more then a 12 pipe card from nv that was modified from their 5900 core. That is y ati had to pull out their best offer (the xt oced to the xtpe) at the same time they released the pro.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: Marsumane
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.


Err, I don't know how you could have made "the biggest mistake":
1. There are no games a 6800U won't perform well enough on that you will miss the difference in performance of an X800XT
2. If you turn off the brilinear filtering that compromises IQ in some situations, the cards should be about equal
3. The impact of SM3 over the life of the card for you remains to be seen, and you wouldn't have it at all with the X800XT. ATI couldn't figure it out and is stuck with the limited features of DX9b, which they've had for 2 years.

I dont think that they couldnt figure it out, its more that they cidnt bother figuring it out or started to work on it too late after finding nv having it already implemented in ther new cards. Afterall, ati expected nothing more then a 12 pipe card from nv that was modified from their 5900 core. That is y ati had to pull out their best offer (the xt oced to the xtpe) at the same time they released the pro.

Unless you work at ATI, I'm going to have to assume they wanted to put out a DX9c card the month before DX9c became available. It wouldn't make sense for them not to.
As for them expecting a 12 pipe nV35, I don't know how their industrial intelligence works, so I can't comment on what they did and didn't know.
I assume MS made the specs of SM3 available to them though.
 

jiffylube1024

Diamond Member
Feb 17, 2002
7,430
0
71
Originally posted by: Marsumane
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: EngenZerO
I was actually in the same situation you were in.

I had an x800xt on order from compusa and then for some odd reson, I decided I would rather have the nvidia card this go around. I cancelled my order from compusa and ended up purchasing the BFG 6800 Ultra. Granted I spend an extra 100 dollars I personally believe nvidia will win this round in the long run. It will take them a few months to iron out the driver issues but I am a hoe for new technology. Dunno, I could have made the bigged mistake but what is done is done.


Err, I don't know how you could have made "the biggest mistake":
1. There are no games a 6800U won't perform well enough on that you will miss the difference in performance of an X800XT
2. If you turn off the brilinear filtering that compromises IQ in some situations, the cards should be about equal
3. The impact of SM3 over the life of the card for you remains to be seen, and you wouldn't have it at all with the X800XT. ATI couldn't figure it out and is stuck with the limited features of DX9b, which they've had for 2 years.

I dont think that they couldnt figure it out, its more that they cidnt bother figuring it out or started to work on it too late after finding nv having it already implemented in ther new cards. Afterall, ati expected nothing more then a 12 pipe card from nv that was modified from their 5900 core. That is y ati had to pull out their best offer (the xt oced to the xtpe) at the same time they released the pro.


And Nvidia has never had to invent or pull a trump card out early before (and sometimes prematurely)? *cough* FX5800 Ultra with the DustBuster FX cooling, *cough cough* 5950, etc. That is the nature of the industry.

Honestly, both companies have faster and faster cards waiting to be released if/when the market demands them and if/when their competitor releases something faster.


It is exactly the same situation in the CPU market. Why do you think Intel held strong at the 3.0 GHz mark for so long, when 3.2 GHz was clearly a possibility earlier? Why did Intel not standardize hyperthreading on the lower end chips until much later than the 3.06 with HT was released, and even then hesitantly? Why was the EE series even released/sent for testing? It was in response to market conditions. Intel didn't do 'value' hyperthreading for a long time because they didn't have to - AMD was behind with the AXP at the time. Intel was then planning to just slap HT on their 533 bus chips for the masses, but in response to all the hype of AMD's 64 bit 'Hammer' lineup (and internal delays to Prescott), they put Prescott's 800 MHz FSB on their whole line of Northwood P4's.

Same thing for the EE, AMD released the A64 series and just whooped intel's arse in benchmarks, so Intel had to get something out the door to make them look like the market leader again.

To say that either Nvidia or AMD have been caught totally off guard in the past few years is pretty ignorant. The only time when it seems one company was truly caught by surprise was Nvidia after the surprisingly powerful and feature filled 9700 Pro debuted several years ago, and that was only because ATI was just then transitioning from the old mediocre company they were to the sharp new company they are today under the direction of ArtX brains and management.

Since then neither company has truly been floored by a competitor's product - they know what to expect from one another.

Did ATI plan to hold back the X800 XT? I think it's pretty obvious they did. However, were they ready to launch it if need be? Of course they were - it's hitting the channels in the same quantities as Nvidia's new cards are right now.


And to dismiss the X800 XT PE as just an 'overclocked XT' - well geez, which company is truly selling overclocked chips? The one who releases faster cards on a whim, or the one who slaps gigantic CPU-style HSF's onto dual-slot power hungry GPU's?

Both companies are doing a smashing job right now. I mean, check the benchmarks - they're neck and neck for chrissakes!
 

TimisoaraKill

Senior member
Dec 17, 2000
510
0
0
In FarCry the most advanced 3D engine and overall D3D games , the x800xtpe win hands down , ..Nvidia will never beat ATI this round in next 3D games , they will might equal with some IQ cut but that's all .
All next big releases (some 10) are in 3D ,.. in the other side you have Doom III so the ideea is , why buy a card who work best for a game and be underdog in the others and not buy a card who is the best in all games and the underdog in one . The PS 3.0 might a feature but still when it will be used it will gain some 1-4 fps so is still not a big deal .
Some people here want so bad Nvidia to win this time that they can't realy see the reality anymore.
ATI was and it will always be the best in 3D in picture quality , speed and as well driver support , so for the next real world games , (no sintetic benches and hardware specs) must be a masochist to pay one penny more for a card who will have less fps in most games and be barely equal in others .
 

Rage187

Lifer
Dec 30, 2000
14,276
4
81
"In FarCry the most advanced 3D engine and overall D3D games , the x800xtpe win hands down , ..Nvidia will never beat ATI this round"


Except when FarCry releases the PS 3.0 patch, which Ati wont be able to do.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Originally posted by: TimisoaraKill
In FarCry the most advanced 3D engine and overall D3D games , the x800xtpe win hands down , ..Nvidia will never beat ATI this round in next 3D games , they will might equal with some IQ cut but that's all .
All next big releases (some 10) are in 3D ,.. in the other side you have Doom III so the ideea is , why buy a card who work best for a game and be underdog in the others and not buy a card who is the best in all games and the underdog in one . The PS 3.0 might a feature but still when it will be used it will gain some 1-4 fps so is still not a big deal .
Some people here want so bad Nvidia to win this time that they can't realy see the reality anymore.
ATI was and it will always be the best in 3D in picture quality , speed and as well driver support , so for the next real world games , (no sintetic benches and hardware specs) must be a masochist to pay one penny more for a card who will have less fps in most games and be barely equal in others .

Boy, there are a lot of problems with this.

1. 6800 new design, drivers will improve
2. You have no way of knowing what the difference in SM3 will do to Far Cry
3. ATI is not the best IQ anymore, 6800 w/o optomization is
4. LOL at "ATI always has been and always will be best for drivers" On what planet?
5. Since when is 24 bit full precision?
6. All ATI benchmarks you've seen are brilinear filtered
7. You can't generalize Far Cry D3d to all other games. There are and will be games in D3d that run better on nVidia
8. Doom3 will probably be the single most licensed fps engine this year, so you're not buying for "one game"
Etc etc etc

Timesoarwowakilla, I don't know if I've ever seen so much wrong with a post. Even if I were working at ATI I don't think I could agree with much of what you said! :roll:
 

TimisoaraKill

Senior member
Dec 17, 2000
510
0
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
[

Boy, there are a lot of problems with this.

1. 6800 new design, drivers will improve
2. You have no way of knowing what the difference in SM3 will do to Far Cry
3. ATI is not the best anymore, 6800 w/o optomization is
4. LOL at "ATI always has been and always will be best for drivers" On what planet?
5. Since when is 24 bit full precision?
6. All ATI benchmarks you've seen are brilinear filtered
Etc etc etc


1.I agree that driver will improve with time but the ATI driver as well .
2.The E3 SM3.0 patch show a 3-5 fps increase , but of course they must fix some serious bugs before , while i agree that the SM3.0 will bring better visuals than they have right now .
3. Is a ATI patented feature and a great optimisation without "any IQ loss" and great speed .
4.I say better for D3D driver , you need to read again my post , so for you what is a good driver , this one pushed to x800release only to show more fps :

61.11 driver bugs:

117597 [TWIMTBP]NV40,WinXP: Corruption when trying to take a screenshot with AA enabeld in Far Cry.

117561 [TWIMTBP]NV38/40,WinXP: Corruption of some weapons in Far Cry.

117474 [TWIMTBP]NV40,WinXP: Fog broke in Far Cry.

113476 NV38/40-WinXP: Lighting/shadow problem in FarCry.

117575 [TWIMTBP] NV40/38: Banding visible from wall in FarCry

5.The rest is useless repeated stuff and already be debated up here in the first 4 points.

At the end ATI is faster in today most advanced D3D engines and will proly be the same in future and Nvidia is faster in obsolete Q III engine games , no driver or SM3 will change this.
 
Apr 14, 2004
1,599
0
0
Afterall, ati expected nothing more then a 12 pipe card from nv that was modified from their 5900 core.
Huh????????????????????

To original poster: AGP should be around for at least 2-3 years.
 

nRollo

Banned
Jan 11, 2002
10,460
0
0
Errr, like I said, Doom3 will probably be the most licensed fps engine this year and since it's not out yet, I don't see how it can be obsolete.

As far ATI being faster in todays "most advanced D3d games", ATI can't even PLAY todays most advanced D3d games. DX9c is due next month, ATI doesn't have it.

Watch and learn, there is a reason ATI is selling X800XTs below MSRP at launch. Times are changing, and people are going to want to have SM3 this year. All ATI users will be able to say is "Well, we have fast brilinear".
(that does produce image degradation, according to owners and reviewers)
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,380
30,514
146
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, like I said, Doom3 will probably be the most licensed fps engine this year and since it's not out yet, I don't see how it can be obsolete.

As far ATI being faster in todays "most advanced D3d games", ATI can't even PLAY todays most advanced D3d games. DX9c is due next month, ATI doesn't have it.

Watch and learn, there is a reason ATI is selling X800XTs below MSRP at launch. Times are changing, and people are going to want to have SM3 this year. All ATI users will be able to say is "Well, we have fast brilinear".
(that does produce image degradation, according to owners and reviewers)
That's either prophetic vision, or famous last words brudda
 

SithSolo1

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2001
7,740
11
81
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, like I said, Doom3 will probably be the most licensed fps engine this year and since it's not out yet, I don't see how it can be obsolete.

As far ATI being faster in todays "most advanced D3d games", ATI can't even PLAY todays most advanced D3d games. DX9c is due next month, ATI doesn't have it.

Watch and learn, there is a reason ATI is selling X800XTs below MSRP at launch. Times are changing, and people are going to want to have SM3 this year. All ATI users will be able to say is "Well, we have fast brilinear".
(that does produce image degradation, according to owners and reviewers)

Ok, odds are the Doom3 engine will be scond to the Souce engine. Granted its just a guess but there are already two games being developed on it aside from HL2 which WILL be game of the year for most game review sites/mags/publications. If it's not I'll send you a dollar.

Yes, I agree Nvidia has the technological edge this time but who knows how well it will run games with the DX9c path. Odds are it will be fast, how much faster is yet to be seen. Odds are running SM3.0 it may be about to catch up to the X800XT. As for DX9c coming out next month, on MS's schedule thats like Christmas.

ATi has issues with drivers, they fix one thing but they break another. If they ever fixed everything I'd be amazed.

As for ATi's brilinear, I have very good eyes and I can't see anything wrong with it. It looks fine. The only people that will affect are super users like us and we have to want to see a problem for it to be there.

Right now NVidia is going to own the $250-300 range with the 6800nu.

24-bit is not full precision but it will be just fine for the next two years.

Right now we really don't have a good SM2.0 game to bench with, FarCry is not one.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,380
30,514
146
Right now we really don't have a good SM2.0 game to bench with, FarCry is not one.
Could someone elaborate on this point please?
 

SithSolo1

Diamond Member
Mar 19, 2001
7,740
11
81
FarCry is mainly a SM1.1 game, using 2.0 only for the lighting calculations on high and very high.
 

ZimZum

Golden Member
Aug 2, 2001
1,281
0
76
If you need a PCIE card I would go with the X800xt. Its a true PCIE card where as nVidias is just an agp card with a PCIE Bridge slapped onto it. Kind of defeats the purpose of PCIE.

The 6800 series is still slower than the x800 series at PS2.0. The question is will nVidia be able to run sm3.0 code faster than ATI can run ps2.0 code. Since there isn't really anything Devs can do with sm3.0 that they cant do with 2.0.
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
Maybe some people will like the X800XT with older core better than the 6800. They may get "bored" with a 6800U, or maybe they find the X800 "unique" or "interesting". Maybe they can get one with a great big cooling system which will somehow flick their switch. They may claim it doesn't make a difference what technology the cards use as long performance is within 10% in carefully selected benchmarks. They may make light of newer shader tech and claim that the improved visuals dont mean anything and it doesn't matter what future games do since no (good) games are out today.. "Ooh...shiney pipes, shiny water spank spank" or some nonsense like that.

There are all kinds of excuses one can make to choose his or her favorite brand over another even if it is based on an older core if they really want to.

Nah. None of that would make any sense. They would have to be a real fan boy to think that way.
 

CaiNaM

Diamond Member
Oct 26, 2000
3,718
0
0
Originally posted by: Rollo
Errr, like I said, Doom3 will probably be the most licensed fps engine this year and since it's not out yet, I don't see how it can be obsolete.

As far ATI being faster in todays "most advanced D3d games", ATI can't even PLAY todays most advanced D3d games. DX9c is due next month, ATI doesn't have it.

Watch and learn, there is a reason ATI is selling X800XTs below MSRP at launch. Times are changing, and people are going to want to have SM3 this year. All ATI users will be able to say is "Well, we have fast brilinear".
(that does produce image degradation, according to owners and reviewers)

well, while there is much speculation being tossed from both sides of the fence, there is one point here that is absolutely incorrect.

ati is not selling the XT below msrp. the vendors are, and only 2 i know of - gateway and cdw (neither of which have them in stock). the rest are selling them at or above msrp.

how much below or above msrp is not dictated by ati.

as for the rest of the BS being tossed back and forth, only time will tell.

edit: oh, and try snagging an x800pro for msrp or below; most everyone paid well in excess of the $399 msrp for theirs.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |