- Sep 20, 2003
- 9,599
- 2
- 0
Originally posted by: isekii
um.. a lot of those belong together..
nissan/infinity
honda/acura
toyota/scion/lexus
ford/volvo/and several others..
etc...
Originally posted by: JCobra14
Why seperate the GM brands, but leave an option for GM ?
Originally posted by: JCobra14
Why seperate the GM brands, but leave an option for GM ?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
divisions shouldn't be separated
Originally posted by: Chadder007
Originally posted by: ElFenix
divisions shouldn't be separated
I think they should be separate....some divisions have their cars made elsewhere. Like Ford's plants in the U.S. don't build the Volvo's or do all have the same parts (Volvos use Inline 5 cylinder engines with Turbos....do ANY Fords???). Land Rovers chassis and engine was last designed by BMW.... not Ford either, yet they still own them.
differnt brands, but same automakers.Originally posted by: PorBleemo
Originally posted by: isekii
um.. a lot of those belong together..
nissan/infinity
honda/acura
toyota/scion/lexus
ford/volvo/and several others..
etc...
But aren't they all technically different brands?
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Haha, who voted Oldsmobile?
But aren't they all technically different brands?
Ditto on both counts.Originally posted by: SirDude
Ferrari. BTW, you have way to much spare time.
Originally posted by: fivespeed5
only 2 people voted for Porsche?