ThinClient
Diamond Member
- Jan 28, 2013
- 3,977
- 4
- 0
What you want is for people to do is think like you. The "white mans burden". There are happy and rational people who are religious who do good things. Teachers, plumbers, and yes even scientists, and you proselytize like this? You "free" them this way by letting them know they don't fit your personal metric?
Nah, I ask questions like how do you know that what you believe is correct? I ask what evidence they've seen to drive them to the conclusion that a creator exists or that a god is real or that the Bible is infallible or that Christ was divine, etc. I don't get snippy and insulting unless they turn out like Rob M. who, like what was stated earlier, pretends not to know anything about evolution (as an example), gets it explained to him, slinks away from the thread, then comes shitting all over other threads as if nobody explained it to him. The ones who want to argue ignorantly are far more entertaining to me, admittedly, because I like conflict and I like arguing. I think rational civilized debate is the only true measure of intelligence and respect for one another. Weird, huh
One can construct nice sentences and use the best grammar and still be completely wrong. You speak of judgement by the religious and make blanket statements in judgement. Maybe I should get religion if this is the "logical" alternative.
The blanket statements I make are based on my own personal experience. You're either extremely simple minded to get lost in religion and defend it in the face of conflicting evidence or you're knowingly spreading the lie of religion and you don't care that you're wrong and that you're lying to others of your own species. I respect neither.
No, once again it has been demonstrated that this is not a place where religion can be discussed thoughtfully, and those were always rare, but rather a pig with lipstick.
It can be discussed thoughtfully and respectfully just like how I'm replying to you, just not with people like Rob M. If Rob posted the same way you do, these threads he gets involved in wouldn't degrade into the circus that they seem to degrade into.
If someone attacked blacks or gays with such blanket statements they'd be gone in a minute but ignorance is far reaching and not just with Pat Robertson.
Right, because my disdain for organized religion which is responsible for the vast majority of conflict in the world is the same as me being racist? Wow, impressive. When are you going to mention Nazis?
I would have avoided this thread but religion bashing has become the dominant topic in this subforum, the one that draws.
It had promise but some genius threw open the doors and asked for this. So be it.
Religion isn't the dominant topic in this forum at all. The number of threads on religion do not out number the number of threads on everything else. Religion comes up from time to time amidst many other topics. It just so happens that religion is on of the more heated topics since it has more people involved in both sides of the line. I wouldn't participate much in an abortion or gun control thread because I'm not as vested in those topics.