It's Hynix.
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Supports AMD Ryzen™ 8000 and 7000 Series Processors<br />24+2+1 Phase Power Design, SPS for VCore+GT<br />4 x DDR5 DIMMs, Supports Dual Channel, up to 7800+ (OC)<br />2 PCIe 5.0 x16<br />Graphics Output Options: 2 USB4 Type-C, 1 HDMI<br />Realtek ALC4082 5.1 CH HD Audio Codec,, ESS SABRE9218...www.asrock.com
My memory is also Hynix. Not sure what flavor of Hynix.
Thats my motherboard ! (even though it goes straight to QVL)It's Hynix.
ASRock X670E Taichi Carrara
Supports AMD Ryzen™ 8000 and 7000 Series Processors<br />24+2+1 Phase Power Design, SPS for VCore+GT<br />4 x DDR5 DIMMs, Supports Dual Channel, up to 7800+ (OC)<br />2 PCIe 5.0 x16<br />Graphics Output Options: 2 USB4 Type-C, 1 HDMI<br />Realtek ALC4082 5.1 CH HD Audio Codec,, ESS SABRE9218...www.asrock.com
My memory is also Hynix. Not sure what flavor of Hynix.
Micron DDR5 is peasant memory. Low speeds with terrible timings.LOL I meant Hynix the entire time. The UEFI reports Hynix and I have read online it's Hynix, but not sure what die. Man, what a morning.
Micron DDR5 is peasant memory. Low speeds with terrible timings.
3DMark 16 threads Hall of Fame
The 3DMark.com Overclocking Hall of Fame is the official home of 3DMark world record scores.www.3dmark.com
You are no.12!
Is this good enough or do you want to rank even higher?
CL30 is not stable. Went back to 32. Put in timings based on Juntinus' screenshots. Lowered several of them from even what he had shown. 8 hours stable MemTest and Prime95 512K+ FFT.CL32 is stable on my Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB at 6000. Prior instability must have been from also lowering tRCD and tRP. Kept both of those at 38 this time.
Trying CL30 now along with some of the tweaked secondary timings Justinus posted. So far it's 1 hour stable in stress tests.
CL30 is not stable. Went back to 32. Put in timings based on Juntinus' screenshots. Lowered several of them from even what he had shown. 8 hours stable MemTest and Prime95 512K+ FFT.
View attachment 68703
Usually when a RAM module dies it dies. No degradation, just death. It's high voltage that will do it. I haven't seen a module die if it's in it's recommended range.I never mess with RAM because it's time consuming and because I don't know much about its nature. Like a CPU getting overclocked may shorten its useful life by a decade or so (still long enough to not matter for most people). Does pushing RAM over the edge cause permanent damage to it? Suppose if I were to successfully run DDR5-6000 RAM at DDR5-6400, would a day come when suddenly the RAM doesn't work at 6400 or even at 6000 and I have to dial it way back down?
Try this: https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/tool/intelr-memory-latency-checker.html58.9 ns is the new latency I get in AIDA64. Would use the beta version, but the $4 key I bought from G2A a couple years back doesn't work with it.
View attachment 68707
Anyone tested the usb ports on these mobos? Any weird disconnect issues using Windows 11? (is Windows 11 playing nice with new Amd hardware?)
Thats my motherboard ! (even though it goes straight to QVL)
What I don't get is why my CPU Profile 16 thread scores are so much lower compared to others with 7950Xs or even 5950Xs while my max thread score seems spot on.We are discussing this on a other forum, but i can share here also.
Graphic card performance on the AM5 platform seem to be down compared to AM4, both in games and 3dmark.
So far we are 3 people seeing the same atm..
View attachment 68720
View attachment 68721
Its only in pure CPU benchmarks the 7950x is carrying the score.. (same 3090 used for all benches)
Have any of you noticed this ?
After my troubles, I would say memory.7950x and MSI Ma Ace, first I got this to boot first time (amazing right!), updated BIOS to latest from 9/27 (worked fine no issues). Even booted into Acronis Recover PE (by accident). So all looked good.
Now everything went wrong.
First I have 2 NVMe drives a 980Pro (1TB) and an XPS (2TB), using slots 2 and 3 nothing worked. Using 1 and 3 only the drive in 1 is found, using 1 and 2 I was able to see both sometimes, but system liked to hang accessing NVMe, or on installing Windows drive would just disappear. So I removed the second drive, also removed the Intel NIC (wanted 3 ethernet ports), and video card. Figured good back to basics and work my way up.
Now it does not even boot I hang on 32 or 33 which is CPU post-memory init started or CP post-memory int - cache initialization.
So do I have a bad CPU, I mean it worked for about an hour, is it bad memory (same thing), or bad MB (never would handle 2 NVMe drives). I can not trouble shoot I have no extra parts to work with. Resetting BIOS has not helped either, tied that a few times already.
ERIC
Just a shot in the dark, do you have SAM enabled on both platforms?We are discussing this on a other forum, but i can share here also.
Graphic card performance on the AM5 platform seem to be down compared to AM4, both in games and 3dmark.
So far we are 3 people seeing the same atm..
View attachment 68720
View attachment 68721
Its only in pure CPU benchmarks the 7950x is carrying the score.. (same 3090 used for all benches)
Have any of you noticed this ?
I don't know what did it, but my 16T score look good now. There was an update released today for 3DMark and I updated Windows 11 to 22H2.What I don't get is why my CPU Profile 16 thread scores are so much lower compared to others with 7950Xs or even 5950Xs while my max thread score seems spot on.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti video card benchmark result - AMD Ryzen 9 7950X,ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. ROG CROSSHAIR X670E EXTREME (3dmark.com)
View attachment 68728
My Geekbench scores seem good.
ASUS System Product Name - Geekbench Browser
We are discussing this on a other forum, but i can share here also.
Graphic card performance on the AM5 platform seem to be down compared to AM4, both in games and 3dmark.
So far we are 3 people seeing the same atm..
Its only in pure CPU benchmarks the 7950x is carrying the score.. (same 3090 used for all benches)
Have any of you noticed this ?