SMT3 coz Primes are better.
It would already be out but there's just a teensy weensy bug. Sometimes, you get results in reverse.Where's reverse SMT when you need it??
We all want that. Unfortunately, X3D manufacturing cost is still too high and slower (so less volume) for AMD to commit to it exclusively.I even suggest AMD should bundle X3D with Zen5 cause with total performance degradation, AMD will face similar fate with Zen4's launching if they intend to launch Zen5 with similar prices.....at least this is my opinion
If Zen 5 is as fast as we expect, it will win he gaming crown over 14900k even without x3d. And for desktop, there is no other real use.We all want that. Unfortunately, X3D manufacturing cost is still too high and slower (so less volume) for AMD to commit to it exclusively.
He is annoying AF who is way too arrogant for how bad he is leaking stuff.To be honest I'm sort of baffled of how people here treated mlid like he's an anti-christ.
He prob does have some actual sources, but he guesses or makes stuff up the other half the time.He definitely has good infos
It makes good entertainment, good leaks or not.and people who are into tech news watch him religiously.
Well, I'm chronically online so....Right after a new video is posted, a member linked that here almost instantly.
I swear to god chinese reviewers are infinitely better than the US based ones lol. I watched a Jarrods Tech video where he talks about why he doesn't do CPU perf/watt testing anymore, and his answer was "idk how useful it will be" : |View attachment 86593
Geekerwan has posted Youtube video reviewing 2 x Bergamo 128c, what caught me is above slide showing the optimisation of BIOS which could speed up the performance of system. I may not familiar with above but at least from discussions with adroc and other member, I have an idea what to expect
I suspect the reason falls squarely under being bought by the highest bidder that is currently not doing so well on the perf/watt front.I swear to god chinese reviewers are infinitely better than the US based ones lol. I watched a Jarrods Tech video where he talks about why he doesn't do CPU perf/watt testing anymore, and his answer was "idk how useful it will be" : |
I don’t think adroc is a “leaker” in the traditional sense. He’s not running a YouTube channel or a twitter account for notoriety. He probably knows people in the industry and is a tech nerd like the rest of us.The numbper 32% IPC increase is oddly specific. It wouldn't surprise me if AMD was looking for a leak and gave out different numbers to see where it lead. Any leaker worth a crap would've protected their source and said something like "30-35%". I don't know what to believe, but I sure as heck don't believe him. If I am wrong I will gladly admit it when the time comes.
I have a decent guess (IMO) where he got that figure from 👀The numbper 32% IPC increase is oddly specific
Leak it ! xDI have a decent guess (IMO) where he got that figure from 👀
Do you mean IOD to CCD? Probably none with Zen 5, big changes with Zen 6Any rumors about changes to the memory fabric?
Lol I don't have any actual numbers, I'm not an insider in any way. I hope I have made that clear to the regulars of this forum.Leak it ! xD
I mean increase in speed/bandwidth.Do you mean IOD to CCD? Probably none with Zen 5, big changes with Zen 6
what caught me is above slide showing the optimisation of BIOS which could speed up the performance of system.
Nah, SMT>1 is old tech. Where's reverse SMT when you need it??
I wonder if he would want to wake up if he realize he will get single digit percentage gains . [15% IPC gain + supposed 5 % clock regression = paltry 9% perf gain.]"I just wanted to close my eyes, go to sleep, and then wake up and buy this thing. I want to be in the future, this thing is awesome and it's going be so great - I can't wait for it." - Mike Clark
That’s not how this works though . They’ll run them in parallel, because they are entirely different processes RE: PDK’s and design rules. Good god, look at FinFlEX alone.And if TSMC isn't going to produce any N3B wafers once N3E comes online, then Intel would have to port their design. Which wouldn't be much of an issue, if this change in plans was done far enough ahead of time.
Why is it fine for Apple to switch to N3E in the middle of the A17's run but you seem to believe that's unthinkable for Intel?
That we’ll see about, RE: M3. If there is a chip they’d delay to port and tapeout on N3E and avoid N3B outright it’s certainly the M series as opposed to the A series, I do agree there. Lots of ways it could go though.If A17 is going to be on N3E as soon as that process is available, I still think it is quite likely Apple does not produce any N3B M3s and they are all N3E - to avoid the cost of having two versions of that design.
If there are no M3 Macs announced next month I think it is pretty safe to say we won't see them until next spring and if so we will know for sure they are N3E.
We will see about Intel. They may have decided to wait for N3E to avoid dealing with the issues of N3B. Apple was willing to do so because they needed the density for A17, but we've all seen the rumors that it will switch to N3E next year.