I hope performance, and i honestly hope Adroc is truthful and its higher, like 50 percent
I consulted my toaster oven and it assured me that the IPC gain would be > 50% with no frequency regression. My toaster oven has impeccable sources, or so it says.I hope performance, and i honestly hope Adroc is truthful and its higher, like 50 percent Even if its 50 percent IPC
I hope so too, of course. But if I had to put money on it either way, it would have to go on the side of the hype train derailing, as it almost always does.
Well your AI is better than mine. ChatGPT 3.5, via OpenAI won't even hazard a guess for me. It starts whining about its training. I asked for estimates but it still refused to give a number. It seems AI is even more cagey than Youtube 'leakers'I consulted my toaster oven and it assured me that the IPC gain would be > 50% with no frequency regression. My toaster oven has impeccable sources, or so it says.
Idk but I feel MLID is more legit than RGT is.After RGT spilled thoses speculative beans i m eagerly awaiting for some MLID s devastating counter attack with due numbers from unautorised sources, the best leaker title and supremacy is at play here.
Neither of them have any idea what they're talking about.Idk but I feel MLID is more legit than RGT is.
It's Zen5% so it gotta be 5%.
We can still be disappointed. It can turn out to be -10% when released. 🤣There we go. Now we can't disappointed if we're expecting -5% IPC increase.
Idk but I feel MLID is more legit than RGT is.
Idk but I feel MLID is more legit than RGT is.
That's reflected in their subscriber count I guess.They both flail in the dark but MLID is a better presenter.
I remember my jaw dropping when Conroe launched and I saw the benchmarks in comparison to the clock speeds. It made the Pentium 4 obsolete.I only had in mind the expansion of the core logic and the resulting IPC gain.It is known that Yonah's biggest problem was the lower maximum clock speed, so Conroe's much higher IPC and achieving a much higher clock speed resulted in a significant increase in Core 2 performance.
You should watch just a couple reviews and come to the ballpark conclusion.What is the average ST performance improvement YoY for CPU cores?
Considering all the main players: Intel, AMD, Apple, ARM
Yonah was also 32bit, alas.I remember my jaw dropping when Conroe launched and I saw the benchmarks in comparison to the clock speeds. It made the Pentium 4 obsolete.
We desperately need another Conroe style correction in that regard. IMO Too much silicon (and power, for that matter) is wasted chasing high clocks.
Yonah was mobile only, so that was likely the reason you never saw higher clocks.
Conroe was also super successful because that was around the time Apple switched to x86.
Hopefully AMD gets things going in the right direction with Zen 5.
But Netbrust was a high-clock microarchitecture with a 1-way x86 decoder.I remember my jaw dropping when Conroe launched and I saw the benchmarks in comparison to the clock speeds. It made the Pentium 4 obsolete.
We desperately need another Conroe style correction in that regard. IMO Too much silicon (and power, for that matter) is wasted chasing high clocks.
Yonah was mobile only, so that was likely the reason you never saw higher clocks.
Conroe was also super successful because that was around the time Apple switched to x86.
Hopefully AMD gets things going in the right direction with Zen 5.
15% ?You should watch just a couple reviews and come to the ballpark conclusion.
Decode is whatever tier stuff.But Netbrust was a high-clock microarchitecture with a 1-way x86 decoder.
Today, GoldenCove has a 6-way decoder that is wider than previous generations, unlike Netbrust whose decoder was narrower. The Pentium III had a 3-way decoder.