The simple average of those results is 36.75%
A higher but yes.so 30% on average for MT perf excluding games.
Nothing is simple anymore, haven't you heard SPEC numbers can be outliers?The simple average of those results is 36.75%
Hm...is JS used by many programms? I have no idea tbh...Yeah but those aren't really relevant workloads for the most part.
Needs JS numbers.
Libquantum is long gone so no.haven't you heard SPEC numbers can be outliers?
You used it right now by poasting that.Hm...is JS used by many programms?
lol okay... xD Thanks!Libquantum is long gone so no.
You used it right now by poasting that.
Sadly, JS has been the daily driver for like 90+% of *standard* workloads.Hm...is JS used by many programms? I have no idea tbh...
So this is a perf. increase over Zen 4, not an IPC increase? (keeping in mind the rumoured clocks being + ~3-4% )Needs translation:
Fortnite 7%
Passmark 11%
R23 1T 20%
7-Zip 28%
V-Ray CPU 33%
Metro Exodus 38%
Dolphin Bench 71%
WPrime 86%
Avg 3?%.
It's iso/clk, so an IPC increase apparently. The following tweet appears to suggest so.So this is a perf. increase over Zen 4, not an IPC increase?
Unlikely it's 90%. Surely for some JS accounts for a large share, but in my case it’s 10-20% at most, the rest is gaming, JRT, native (QT Creator), etc.Sadly, JS has been the daily driver for like 90+% of *standard* workloads
Well, either way, the clock difference is not as big as with the previous gens (maybe this is what was meant by “Avg 3?%” ?)an IPC increase apparently. The following tweet appears to suggest so.
Try to think out of your power-user bubble.Unlikely it's 90%. Surely for some JS accounts for a large share, but in my case it’s 10-20% at most, the rest is gaming, JRT, native (QT Creator), etc.
bingo!The wast majority of PCs is used for office work. These days it usually means interacting with one or more webapps in a browser. Plus Electron(-ish) Teams/Outlook if the corp goes the MS way.
No, the poster was implying the average IPC is 3x% ( meaning between 30 and 39%). Clocks seem to be roughly the same or a slightly higher for ST with Zen 5. Overall it looks like a total pwnage.Well, either way, the clock difference is not as big as with the previous gens (maybe this is what was meant by “Avg 3?%” ?)
Yea.No, the poster was implying the average IPC is 3x% ( meaning between 30 and 39%)
It's really evil, moreso in mobile.Overall it looks like a total pwnage
That's mainstream laptop and they're getting KRK1+chop early next year.systems aimed at folks with lower budgets will only be able to taste Zen 5 a few generations from now?
They are not.But it's worrying that they're simply conceding the budget laptop market to RPL 282
No, the poster was implying the average IPC is 3x% ( meaning between 30 and 39%). Clocks seem to be roughly the same or a slightly higher for ST with Zen 5. Overall it looks like a total pwnage.
I assume KRK 1 is Kraken (Point?). So 8C Z5(C?) + RDNA 3.5 GFX IP? If so, that's really nice for mainstream laptop. Will absolutely shredd with RPL 282.That's mainstream laptop and they're getting KRK1+chop early next year.
They are not.
Not anymore at least.
Yea.I assume KRK 1 is Kraken (Point?)
4+4. Chop is 2+4.So 8C Z5(C?) + RDNA 3.5 GFX IP?
Yeah 8 CUs.RDNA 3.5 GFX IP
RPL 282 is still a far cheaper option but not compelling in 2025 at all.Will absolutely shredd with RPL 282.
Without disputing the distribution by type of PC use in the consumer segment, it is worth noting that for those you mentioned, even Zen4 is too much.Think about the average PC workload. The wast majority of PCs is used for office work. These days it usually means interacting with one or more webapps in a browser. Plus Electron(-ish) Teams/Outlook if the corp goes the MS way.
Ehhh, making MS teams even remotely snappy is the end goal.it is worth noting that for those you mentioned, even Zen4 is too much.
Ehhh, making MS teams even remotely snappy is the end goal.
Not really a feasible goal, eh.Ehhh, making MS teams even remotely snappy is the end goal.