Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)

Page 448 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,282
2,886
106
Qualcomm has been (pre) announcing the Snapdragon WoA for - what, 6 months already?

Another in long series of (pre) announcements today. In comparison, nada from AMD on Zen 5, Strix Point.

Is this going to be:
"Speak softly and carry a big stick" - Teddy Roosevelt
vs.
"Speak loudly and carry a short stick" - Qualcomm?
 

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,282
2,886
106
Wait a tiny little bit and learn Mandarin.

They don't have to do anything since they reserved Computex opening keynote.

I noticed someone on Twitter point out why Qualcomm is hiding performance details, playing shell games...

If Qualcomm can hide the details until after Computex, then AMD can't use real Snapdragon X results in performance comparisons.
 
Reactions: carancho

Kryohi

Member
Nov 12, 2019
27
48
91
see? this one is close.
+20-25% multithreaded improvement would be disappointing imho. Many people including me would be happy not paying the zen5 tax and simply buy a discounted 7950X(3D), or an equivalent Intel.

So hopefully the MT improvement is very close to the ST one, or it's at least reachable with a bit of undervolting and overclocking. Not everyone spends hundreds of $ to brag about single core scores a bit higher than those of an ipad (or to game at uselessly high fps).
 
Reactions: Fjodor2001

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,282
2,886
106

CouncilorIrissa

Senior member
Jul 28, 2023
233
813
96
+20-25% multithreaded improvement would be disappointing imho. Many people including me would be happy not paying the zen5 tax and simply buy a discounted 7950X(3D), or an equivalent Intel.

So hopefully the MT improvement is very close to the ST one, or it's at least reachable with a bit of undervolting and overclocking. Not everyone spends hundreds of $ to brag about single core scores a bit higher than those of an ipad (or to game at uselessly high fps).
ST score is what allows your PC not to choke on the latest Slack update.
 

Kryohi

Member
Nov 12, 2019
27
48
91
It doesn't matter.
It matters to me and every single person I know irl that uses a desktop or workstation.

That's the only metric that really matters in client CPUs.
You keep saying that as if it's some great religious truth, but it's just your opinion. It's not an unreasonable opinion, but still just an opinion.
The vast majority of people that do any kind of serious work on a PC can't afford a Threadripper or an Epyc. Therefore client CPUs (mobile or not) with just "reasonable" (not skylake-like) ST perf and best MT will be always in high demand.

So, what can we expect from Ryzen 9000 on the MT front? Why would it have a more limited improvement compared to ST?
 

Joe NYC

Platinum Member
Jun 26, 2021
2,282
2,886
106
+20-25% multithreaded improvement would be disappointing imho. Many people including me would be happy not paying the zen5 tax and simply buy a discounted 7950X(3D), or an equivalent Intel.

Now, when every computer architecture has a competent multi-core CPUs, the value of multithreaded performance has greatly diminished. You can always throw more core and more money at it to get more multithreaded performance.

Single threaded performance is what separates excellent CPU architectures from those that are merely "meh"

So hopefully the MT improvement is very close to the ST one, or it's at least reachable with a bit of undervolting and overclocking. Not everyone spends hundreds of $ to brag about single core scores a bit higher than those of an ipad (or to game at uselessly high fps).

Ipad does not have the wealth of software that benefits from single core. Arm based Macs lost compatibility with gaming software, and Arm based Mac has been abandoned as a gaming platform.

And if you only play games where FPS is a major thing, then you have a poor taste in games.
 

Hitman928

Diamond Member
Apr 15, 2012
5,526
8,592
136
Why would it have a more limited improvement compared to ST?

Less MT increase compared to ST can come from a few different sources.

1) Power limits are hit, this is usually true especially when the new gen is on a similar node as the last gen. This happened in the Zen 2 -> Zen 3 transition.
2) Cache. Depending on the cache structure, when all cores are fired up, it can put more pressure on any shared cache.
3) Linked to 2, memory bandwidth saturation. With higher performance cores, many MT loads require increased memory bandwidth. If there isn't a sufficient increase in memory BW, then the MT increase will be limited.
4) Linked to 1, temperature. Obviously this one has several variables involved and is usually not really a consideration given that the end customer can use better cooling to mitigate it.
 

adroc_thurston

Diamond Member
Jul 2, 2023
3,134
4,508
96
It matters to me and every single person I know irl that uses a desktop or workstation.
Desktop or workstation is a tiny-tiny part of the PC TAM.
You keep saying that as if it's some great religious truth
Because it is one.
You either deliver 1t CAGR or you're outta the game in client PC.
It's how AMD lost. They just failed to deliver 1t CAGR 2007-onwards.
Why would it have a more limited improvement compared to ST?
Because the core is maxxed around peak 1t perf.
1) Power limits are hit, this is usually true especially when the new gen is on a similar node as the last gen. This happened in the Zen 2 -> Zen 3 transition.
2) Cache. Depending on the cache structure, when all cores are fired up, it can put more pressure on any shared cache.
3) Linked to 2, memory bandwidth saturation. With higher performance cores, many MT threads require increased memory bandwidth. If there isn't a sufficient increase in memory BW, then the MT increase will be limited.
4) Linked to 1, temperature. Obviously this one has several variables involved and is usually not really a consideration given that the end customer can use better cooling to mitigate it.
you forgot the 5) abject death of SMT scaling due to core being 1t-maxxed.
 

Aapje

Golden Member
Mar 21, 2022
1,464
2,028
106
+20-25% multithreaded improvement would be disappointing imho. Many people including me would be happy not paying the zen5 tax and simply buy a discounted 7950X(3D), or an equivalent Intel.

Not really sure what you are expecting. A 20-25% improvement is huge with the gains from new production processes slowing down. But even before that, you'd need to skip a few gens to get a really big boost.

And AMD does indeed play the game of starting with high prices and then gradually decreasing them, to capture more of the consumer surplus. But it's still your choice what to buy and when.
 
Last edited:

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
25,721
14,749
136
If I see anywhere close to 39% in the one test, and multithreaded is at or above 20%, I will be happy with the results. Dying to see Turin results.
 
sale-70-410-exam    | Exam-200-125-pdf    | we-sale-70-410-exam    | hot-sale-70-410-exam    | Latest-exam-700-603-Dumps    | Dumps-98-363-exams-date    | Certs-200-125-date    | Dumps-300-075-exams-date    | hot-sale-book-C8010-726-book    | Hot-Sale-200-310-Exam    | Exam-Description-200-310-dumps?    | hot-sale-book-200-125-book    | Latest-Updated-300-209-Exam    | Dumps-210-260-exams-date    | Download-200-125-Exam-PDF    | Exam-Description-300-101-dumps    | Certs-300-101-date    | Hot-Sale-300-075-Exam    | Latest-exam-200-125-Dumps    | Exam-Description-200-125-dumps    | Latest-Updated-300-075-Exam    | hot-sale-book-210-260-book    | Dumps-200-901-exams-date    | Certs-200-901-date    | Latest-exam-1Z0-062-Dumps    | Hot-Sale-1Z0-062-Exam    | Certs-CSSLP-date    | 100%-Pass-70-383-Exams    | Latest-JN0-360-real-exam-questions    | 100%-Pass-4A0-100-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-300-135-exams-date    | Passed-200-105-Tech-Exams    | Latest-Updated-200-310-Exam    | Download-300-070-Exam-PDF    | Hot-Sale-JN0-360-Exam    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Exams    | 100%-Pass-JN0-360-Real-Exam-Questions    | Dumps-JN0-360-exams-date    | Exam-Description-1Z0-876-dumps    | Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps    | Dumps-HPE0-Y53-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-HPE0-Y53-Exam    | 100%-Pass-HPE0-Y53-Real-Exam-Questions    | Pass-4A0-100-Exam    | Latest-4A0-100-Questions    | Dumps-98-365-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-98-365-Exam    | 100%-Pass-VCS-254-Exams    | 2017-Latest-VCS-273-Exam    | Dumps-200-355-exams-date    | 2017-Latest-300-320-Exam    | Pass-300-101-Exam    | 100%-Pass-300-115-Exams    |
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    | http://www.portvapes.co.uk/    |