The only thing getting N3P is the Mobile SKU
Or more precisely, monolithic mobile Zen 6 CPUs.
Which, unit-wise, will be higher number of CPUs than chiplet based mobile, using N2. + chiplet based desktop N2 parts.
The only thing getting N3P is the Mobile SKU
I can’t wait for Zen6, it will shut up the ARM bros for a bit.
I am 100% hopeful of Zen 6 achieving >6GHz. It’s only 400Mhz away. Doable via NanoFlex
Link please.
I'd expect $50 ASP bumps for sure.
His secret sponsor is AMD( cause his AMD leaks are pretty accurate but his Intel leaks are hit or miss)
It really would not surprise me if, as part of psychological warfare, AMD leaked its roadmap to MLID, in order to send Intel to a state of panic.
Maybe. But it might inspire them to over-deliver to fight a fake roadmap.If you wanted your competitor to panic, wouldn't you leak FAKE roadmaps that scare them more than the real plans would?
Along with DMR 🤣🤣.Whatever advantages (real or perceived) there were for Arm for hyperscalers, Venice Dense is likely going to erase all of those advantages.
When did I say Intel would lower the price?Amazon US:
9800x3d: $472
7900x3d: $369
14900k: $438
285K:$559
Intel is already charging more for weaker gaming performance. Thinking that Intel will charge less for a CPU with 2 large N2 dies is delusional.
And it is not like Intel will not NEED to charge even higher prices. Intel is still in the middle of a financial downfall, the turnaround is still in the distant future (if ever).
This NVL with big cache will probably well > $700
Hello 285K is more than a gaming CPU gaming is not everythingAmazon US:
9800x3d: $472
7900x3d: $369
14900k: $438
285K:$559
Intel is already charging more for weaker gaming performance. Thinking that Intel will charge less for a CPU with 2 large N2 dies is delusional.
I can bet you the 24C Zen 6 and 52C NVL will be at least 40-50% more expensive cause of the upgradesAnd it is not like Intel will not NEED to charge even higher prices. Intel is still in the middle of a financial downfall, the turnaround is still in the distant future (if ever).
This NVL with big cache will probably well > $700
Leapfrog. Concocted. Gelsinger. Fizzled out.You have to wonder if Nova Lake is to be another "leapfrog" concocted by Gelsinger that will fizzle out just like like all his other "leapfrogs" have fizzled out so far.
However, I don't know if AMD will use its capacity for consumer products.The capacity is limited only by what you place orders for. There was, maybe a 1+ year long capacity shortfall for CoWoS type packaging, but that is probably easing too. So there is nothing in the way of AMD placing orders for greater capacity, and TSMC completing that capacity.
If there is a 9600x3d that is universally available (not limited to only certain retailers like 5600x3d was) and AMD prices it between $250 and $300, then AMD will double the shipments of x3d parts.
Which indicates that AMD probably already ordered that capacity increase...
Mi400 is still in the future, right?I think this time around, AMD will be definitely in top 3 users of the most advanced node (N2). Products that will use N2:
- all Venice generations server CPUs
- Mi400 generation of datacenter GPUs
- premium client CPUs
Those numbers will start to add up, since AMD will be close to 50% server CPU volume, and most likely, AMD datecenter GPU will be on a strong upswing with Mi400 generation (from low single digit market share).
And there will likely be a big shift in the premium client CPUs in AMD direction...
When did I say Intel doesn't need to Mark-up? Are you under an illusion?
Are you crazy?
To begin with, the two Intel CPUs you're using as examples haven't had their prices raised at all. They've always been priced like that. If you said, "They're more expensive than these AMD CPUs, so they need to be lowered in price," I'd understand, but why do you use the word "I'm raising the price"?
Are you living in a fantasy world?
Are you crazy? I'm interested. You're making things up as if I said something I didn't say.
I was just commenting on the price of the 9800X3D in my area. I have not heard the price on Amazon America.
Please stop making strange accusations...
Please...
Please give up, really...When did I say Intel would lower the price?
Is that okay?
Are you under an illusion?
Are you crazy?
To begin with, the two Intel CPUs you're using as examples haven't had their prices raised at all. They've always been priced like that. If you said, "They're more expensive than these AMD CPUs, so they need to be lowered in price," I'd understand, but why do you use the word "I'm raising the price"?
Are you living in a fantasy world?
Are you crazy? I'm interested. You're making things up as if I said something I didn't say.
I was just commenting on the price of the 9800X3D in my area. I have not heard the price on Amazon America.
Please stop making strange accusations...
Please...
Yeah, unless Intel decides to go kamikaze and put a massive dent in AMD's gaming marketshare by pricing their bLLC chips too aggressively.It does not make sense to have that expectation.
Why would DMR be anything special if Panther/Coyote Cove in NVL looks like ass?Along with DMR 🤣🤣.
You can't read…?If you follow the thread, @igor_kavinski raised a possibility of greater performance and lower prices of gaming CPUs in the future, when Nova Lake with large L3 ships.
My point was that Intel is now charging more, for lower gaming performance, why would Intel charge less for better performance in the future? It does not make sense to have that expectation.
Wouldn't it be better if we could keep the ARMs in check for the time being?Why would DMR be anything special if Panther/Coyote Cove in NVL looks like ass?
Hello 285K is more than a gaming CPU gaming is not everything
I can bet you the 24C Zen 6 and 52C NVL will be at least 40-50% more expensive cause of the upgrades
Heavy multitaskers. Those who like to browse and encode or do other CPU intensive background tasks. More cores can easily be "felt" in such cases.I wonder what kind of use case will there be for Zen 6 with 24 cores.
However, I don't know if AMD will use its capacity for consumer products.
TSMC is also working hard to expand the post-process line, but it still puts a lot of load on it.
There are many strong rivals competing for the production volume…
I think that AMD will also use that capacity mainly for servers/AI products…
I am pretty sure that the server division will always be a number one goal for AMD. It is what has taken them where they are today. And the client CPUs use the server chiplets, the CPU ones. The IOD I am sure is quite different.In other words, if AMD increased its orders, for greater 3D packaging capacity, it is unlikely that in the short term, that server division would steal it from client division.
Mi400 is still in the future, right?
because of its nature, the die size is large.
It will not be made from the first year of production of N2, probably from the second year when the volume has increased.