When I see RAS I read "Row Address Strobe" . I had to look up what it meant in the context of this discussion.No need to blame the entire readership for my ignorance
When I see RAS I read "Row Address Strobe" . I had to look up what it meant in the context of this discussion.No need to blame the entire readership for my ignorance
I object, I've been here for more than a decade already.I would expect a fair number of garden variety layfolk frequent these parts nowadays. Not many well populated and well managed forums around anymore.
Now you are joking pretending to be layfolk.I object, I've been here for more than a decade already.
Like me ? Yes I objectwaiting for people from 2000s to object
Nice Job Igor!No need to blame the entire readership for my ignorance
I know tons of server side IT people that wouldnt know that level of detail.Wow, surprised the Anandtech readership is so ignorant when it comes to RAS features. This is standard fare on workstation/server level stuff. Intel and AMD even support it in their consumer memory controllers but it is (unfortunately) typically locked in retail units. IIRC memtest86 even supports it on the units that have it unlocked.
There are also DIMM interposers that allow you to inject errors not only in the data lines but also the control/checksum so you can verify that not just the data but also the commands are properly protected and test the memory controller's scrubbing capability.
Hey, my entire brand since birth has been "let me have a crack at it despite not knowing much and maybe it will work?" and it has served me well so far in lifeNice Job Igor!
Hey, my entire brand since birth has been "let me have a crack at it despite not knowing much and maybe it will work?" and it has served me well so far in life
That lack of desire is a very bad thing.Remember that your level of desire to know how things work is likely not generally shared
Do they though? My impression is only people with above desire would be interested in finding solutions and learn the details that way. Most people just give up at that point and move on to the next toy instead.alot of people never get to know this level of detail unless it breaks something and they have to learn
It's not lack of desire as much as it is the difficulty in obtaining the required information. People with deep technical knowledge don't make it easy for normal people to understand their stuff. Like, I would only know about threads and processes if I had studied Andrew Tanenbaum's book on the subject. I actually did try but it was pretty boring and made it harder for me to go through it and I only read enough of it to pass exams.That lack of desire is a very bad thing.
I dont disagree here, but most people just want something to work and don't care HOW it works.That lack of desire is a very bad thing.
If its your job you can't give up, if its not your job then yes most people just give up.Do they though? My impression is only people with above desire would be interested in finding solutions and learn the details that way. Most people just give up at that point and move on to the next toy instead.
I know tons of server side IT people that wouldnt know that level of detail.
Remember that your level of desire to know how things work is likely not generally shared, and alot of people never get to know this level of detail unless it breaks something and they have to learn!
If you think about it, this has to be true, lol.The speed of software halves every 18 months.
Yeah they do it on purpose just so you have to upgrade to keep up.If you think about it, this has to be true, lol.
It didn't really matter because even on Core 2 Quad with a Geforce 9600 GT, I was able to enjoy it without much issue. The graphics were just so good that playing on lower settings didn't make the experience any worse.no one could run Crysis ultra unless huge crazy SLI setup etc...
The speed of software halves every 18 months.
Actually it’s usually called Gates’s law (or Wirth’s law), see this.Fjodor's Law
Now we can all say we were present at the birth of a new computing law!
The speed of Microsoft software halves every 18 months.Fjodor's Law
Now we can all say we were present at the birth of a new computing law!
I wasnt saying what was right, I was saying what I actually see in most cases! =)I would argue it is the server IT people's JOB to know this level of detail. If their employer is buying all prepackaged servers from Dell or whoever, along with any upgrades of DRAM etc. then it is Dell's job to be selling qualified configurations so I can excuse those admins.
If their employer buys whitebox servers or goes to random vendors for DRAM upgrades then it is their job to verify this stuff, you can't just assume it works. But I suppose a lot of them skip that or don't know they should be doing it.
That's hardly the worst oversight I used to see I suppose, but the people who "don't want to know that level of detail unless ... they have to learn" are to blame for the length of many outages. The absolute worst time to be learning something new is when everything is down and the C suite is breathing down your neck!