Which part? Only the first part was a joke, and it was funny - had nothing to do with sexuality. The rest was to show that the perceived insensitivity is a misunderstanding. The only thing I'm guilty of was assuming that Trump's lawyer was a male.
I'm sorry people are looking for things to be...
Even though I question if Trump will actually see punishment worthwhile, I don't think him running to the Supreme Court is going to work out how he hopes. Sure, they are conservative, but what he's fighting isn't a conservative vs non-conservative topic. This is about established law. If they...
One could argue someone defending trump isn't human.
Also...the next time someone gives birth I'll remember to say "They're a boy!" Or "They're a girl!" Wouldn't want someone looking to get triggered to misunderstand and dehumanize them. Of course I'm pretty sure the person will look at me and...
I'm curious to see how this plays out. Is he going to make it his own personal forum to just constantly bash the SEC or anyone who points out when he's on the wrong side of the fence about something. He's just another rich guy who's lost touch with reality and thinks he's above the law.
It's a she? Now I have all sorts of questions... (and no, this wasn't a dig at transgenders, but rather to how Trump feels about women. Per my post above, I had made an assumption based on this that the person was male.)
Because the article specifically says multiple times that this was stated by other people who supposedly heard this, and says he did not comment when asked about it.
This isn't as much of a smoking gun as you'd hope. For one thing the lawyer was working remotely and never saw the docs to know one way or the other. Secondly, the article is all hearsay. He didn't comment on the actual question at hand.
Yes, I believe this happened. Will he flip on Trump under...
I care about indictments as much as impeachments. If nothing meaningful is done from the outcome, it's a waste of time and taxpayers money. An indictment isn't going to change his followers minds, regardless what comes out of it. I want cold hard punishment. Something he can't just lietalk his...
and again..wtf can the dems do about it?
it's a lose lose situation when playing against people with a complete lack of morals. They are saying anything they like to prop themselves up. Anything done or said to point this out just gets villainized.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.