Due to PTL-U GPU is using 4 XE cores made by Intel 3, the graphics performance would be slower than LNL. That's mean PTL-U is positioned slightly below LNL
Good question, I just got reply from my source. You are not going to believe it. PTL-U going to use 4+0+4 configuration. :eek: Maybe Intel wants to treat PTL-U as Lunar Laker successor...
Eug, you do know the advantage of N3B process. Have you ever thought about what Apple going to upgrade the upcoming M4 SoC?
I am expecting 2 more e-cores, 2 more GPU cores and SLC cache expansion. Not to mention the upgrades of NPU TOPS. Why does Apple switching to different design and lower...
Let's see:
ARL-U's tCPU
Sierra Forest
Granite Rapids
PTL's 4Xe tGPU
Upcoming NV ARM SoC
Yep, IF will keep expanding IP of Intel 3 process. It's going to be long term process for IF.
You should use the term used to cause due to 4-tile design, Meteor Lake is having worst memory latency as tested here. I don't think ARL will change that, maybe PTL with integrated MC will let Intel regain the leadership.
Ho, you should check GB202's SM amount. And if my speculation is correct, upcoming GB203 should come with 144SM and GB205 should come with 80SM. Go figure...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.