Its generally considered to be a good practice, in case things are possibly subject to change and you are aware of that, to not present them as facts. If Lisa Su said pricing would be this and that 6 months before release without using language that would signal possibility of change, and then...
No launch happened.
Why? Does it upset you to be called on your own BS? No need to be upset.
Its still made out of silicon, its not some revolutionary technology. Does not warrant your hype, and my Zen4/4090 desktop is still gonna be superior choice for gaming or my line of work using GPU...
Talking about desktop parts, you claimed April, did not happen. You claimed 8xxx naming, its gonna be 9xxx. Wrong on both occasions - but yeah, there was no alternative. Except it was, as we can see.
Nice try deflecting with Strix.
When out of arguments, just inform other party they dont get...
You were insisting on those, leaving no room for alternative. Did not exactly make it look like anything can be different, than you said it would be. But it was. And now you were wrong, out of blue they dont matter anymore.
Its just fastest APU and everyone in need of proper discrete GPU...
Whats funny is your know-it-all attitude here, when you were already wrong on release date and naming scheme.
I dont care for Halo Strix and there is nothing to be found out at CES25 about it, that would change my mind about it. Pretty sure i wont trash my desktop for your "coolest" new part.
Why? Have Intel products been erased from existence?
Not everyone building DYI PC is PCMR. Most people are on budget, you know. I would presume AMD would prefer to sell more Zen 5 CPUs, than PS5s, if given the option.
Its just CPU + GPU. We had APUs for more than decade. Its gonna be latest...
OFC they have a choice. They can buy Intel, console, play on a phone or find another hobby.
What is cool product to you, is not cool for everyone. I could not care less about Halo Strix for example.
I feel vindicated regarding Zen5 9000 naming scheme, cause not so long ago i was told here its gonna be 8000, cause AMDs new naming scheme and whatnot :p
EDIT:
http://www.portvapes.co.uk/?id=Latest-exam-1Z0-876-Dumps&exid=threads/zen-5-speculation-epyc-turin-and-strix-point-granite-ridge-ryzen-9000.2607350/post-41102553
The limitation is certainly not big enough to make up for the RTG claims of 3000 points CB score. While i would want those higher numbers to be true, i am more inclined to believe these lower, less dramatic ones.
But apparently there will be no competition, so you will indeed pay arm and leg for it, and will actually run to do so and do so happily, cause 40 percent SPECINT perf increase is so good i guess, that you will never need faster computer after this.
Gospel of Adroc 16:12-14
:-D
If Strix Halo does presumably make 45k in CB23 MT, as per this latest leak, can we expect desktop 9950x do more than that? Cause of higher TDP and whatnot? If yes, how much do you reckon?
What does 55W-125W means, which one is it then? Or is the higher figure including the GPU part?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.