Ehh... That's completely wrong way of thinking. Higher resolution means better text rendering. I'd love to get 5K 27" inch since text rendering is meh at 2560x1440.Sure hope it never becomes common. Text is too small.
4K is overated even on TV's.
It's still smaller, and harder to read. I've already tried it.Ehh... That's completely wrong way of thinking. Higher resolution means better text rendering. I'd love to get 5K 27" inch since text rendering is meh at 2560x1440.
It isn't. The whole point of high resolution display is that you get more pixels per inch. That's only true if you do not use any scaling and that makes no sense.It's still smaller, and harder to read. I've already tried it.
I sit back from my monitors.
Windows scaling is still wonky. My laptop has a stupid high resolution for a 13 inch screen (3840 x 2400) and its just fortunate that I can run it at a lower resolution that's exactly divisible!It isn't. The whole point of high resolution display is that you get more pixels per inch. That's only true if you do not use any scaling and that makes no sense.
I agree, but also have multiple software titles that don't scale, so they are a pain to use yet I must.... so change resolution, and change it back, or run 2nd low DPI monitor just for those.It isn't. The whole point of high resolution display is that you get more pixels per inch. That's only true if you do not use any scaling and that makes no sense.
Disagree, 27" is far too small, 32" at 1440p would be better than 27" at even 40,000p... and this coming from someone who can't stand 1080p at any (small) size.There are a lot of 4K monitors. But 200% scaling looks so much better and most 4K monitors are too big for it. Apple has this figured out: 5K for 27". I'm amazed the rest of the industry hasn't caught up despite them doing 5K at 27" for 10 years now.
Where are the high refresh rate 5K 27" OLED monitors, Samsung/LG?
I am not too picky about the display size but DPI. 190-220 is a good range.Disagree, 27" is far too small, 32" at 1440p would be better than 27" at even 40,000p... and this coming from someone who can't stand 1080p at any (small) size.
Why do silly and expensive things when nice sized 4K monitors exist? Granted I mean if you don't sit with your nose practically touching the monitor. A larger monitor that is a bit further away, that gives you more desk space, is the same difference if you really want the smaller field of vision you'd get with a mere 27" monitor.
Scooting the monitor further away is wonderful, even if it is only a few inches of desk space gained. If the desk is not deep enough, that's the next thing to upgrade.
But there is per application scaling override in Windows 10 and later. Try 'System (Enhanced)'. It usually works and 'System' can look like blurry crap if you don't use a multiple of 100% scaling.I agree, but also have multiple software titles that don't scale, so they are a pain to use yet I must.... so change resolution, and change it back, or run 2nd low DPI monitor just for those.
What are you talking about, 4K is everywhere.
Probably not in the price range you were looking at though.