Bootlickers are going to bootlick. The guy favors companies over workers without giving it a second thought. Sadly, that type of thinking isn’t unique, people have been rooting against their best interests for decades if not longer.
Free market for goods but not the labor that creates it?
Huh?
So how about the 99% of NCAs that have nothing to do with protecting the ideas of a start up?It's not that simple. If you start a company and hire talent they don't get to just take your idea and compete against you right away. That's bullchit. Thus the NCA was created.
The Biden administration is a horriblely short sighted vote buying group desperate to stay on power.
Fast food workers in some states were being forced to sign NDAsNCAs were actually a great idea to help protect companies from employees who sold their loyalty to the highest bidder.
I guess they will have to devise another method of protection.
NCA over ideas that aren't patented is just rent seeking by lawyers and management that doesn't understand what the idea does. Change my mind.It is that simple actually. Ideas are already protected by patents. Employees own their minds and the skills contained within.
Leave it to the RWNJs to argue for corporate ownership of workers’ economic freedom.
Oh fuck off you corporate cock gobbling stooge.
You fucking dumbshits fall for their trolling, every, single, fucking, time. This is why Republicans/Fascists have been winning, they can derail everything just with low T beta cuck level trolling and people will pivot the entirety of their focus to it.
I know, it sounds excessive and ridiculous to have FF workers sign them. You had some companies that went too far and made it boiler plate for everyone including janitors. That is what probably needed fixing.Fast food workers in some states were being forced to sign NDAs
Great move by Biden. Also this doesn't apply to high level execs.
Free market for goods but not the labor that creates it?
Huh?
It's not that simple. If you start a company and hire talent they don't get to just take your idea and compete against you right away. That's bullchit. Thus the NCA was created.
The Biden administration is a horriblely short sighted vote buying group desperate to stay on power.
It'd be funnier if you weren't seriousIt's not that simple. If you start a company and hire talent they don't get to just take your idea and compete against you right away. That's bullchit. Thus the NCA was created.
The Biden administration is a horriblely short sighted vote buying group desperate to stay on power.
It'd be funnier if you weren'tseriousstupid
NCAs were actually a great idea to help protect companies from employees who sold their loyalty to the highest bidder.
I guess they will have to devise another method of protection.
It's not that simple. If you start a company and hire talent they don't get to just take your idea and compete against you right away. That's bullchit. Thus the NCA was created.
The Biden administration is a horriblely short sighted vote buying group desperate to stay on power.
Commie!NCAs were actually a great idea to help protect companies from employees who sold their loyalty to the highest bidder.
I guess they will have to devise another method of protection.
That's how investment banking ones typically work. You get paid to not work. By the time that's over your knowledge is typically outdated and not as critical.I'm ok with NCAs with the proviso that if you don't want me to work in my chosen job you have to pay me the entirety of the wage that I've given up for the period of the NCA plus compensation for whatever promotions and bonuses I've missed.
It used to be called "gardening leave" over here iirc.That's how investment banking ones typically work. You get paid to not work. By the time that's over your knowledge is typically outdated and not as critical.
I'm guessing they will sue in a certain court in the toilet tank of Texas. Expect a decision that makes it illegal for an employee to get a higher salary when they change jobs.LoL US Chamber of Commerce is going to sue the FTC for this
U.S. Chamber to Sue FTC Over Unlawful Power Grab on Noncompete Agreements Ban
U.S. Chamber statement on the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) final vote to ban employer noncompete agreements and litigation response.www.uschamber.com
Can't think of a better way to come under government scrutiny.
How about I owe a company nothing and the only thing they owe me is pay for hours already worked. With very exceptions a company shouldn't be able to sideline you for years. Under your system it would be very hard for people to find new employment until the end of their NCA, encouraging them to stay with their current company even if they wanted to leave.I'm ok with NCAs with the proviso that if you don't want me to work in my chosen job you have to pay me the entirety of the wage that I've given up for the period of the NCA plus compensation for whatever promotions and bonuses I've missed.
Well under "my system" (if I'm making one) you'd still get the choice to blow of your old employer and just get a new job starting immediately if you wanted!How about I owe a company nothing and the only thing they owe me is pay for hours already worked. With very exceptions a company shouldn't be able to sideline you for years. Under your system it would be very hard for people to find new employment until the end of their NCA, encouraging them to stay with their current company even if they wanted to leave.
Not if you had to wait 2 years before you could start. Yeah, you'd be paid for that 2 years, but not at your new salary and no company is going to wait for 2 years on you.Well under "my system" (if I'm making one) you'd still get the choice to blow of your old employer and just get a new job starting immediately if you wanted!
My wife was fired from a job, and she signed a non-compete so she couldn't start her own business under those limitations. She started another business anyway, promptly got sued, and promptly won and had her legal fees paid for by the defendant. It was first court case I ever sat in for, and it was interesting. At the end the judge told the defendants right out that if they appeal, they would lose again.
My wife's lawyer simply argued that it was too onerous for her to not be expected to want to practice again and that she not only would not take information and private practices to her next job, but that she in fact had developed some of those and they were not the sole ownership of her bosses. I guess a non-compete is one way to stifle innovation or free enterprise. Thank god it's gone.