@mikk provided the source. Now please come up with an excuse, like you always do.
First rule of fight club/CPU forum is attack the post not the poster. You just keep doing it anyways. Enjoy your vacation.
Mod DAPUNISHER
The rate at which you're going, Zen 5 IPC might as well depend on the a multitude of likely factors - ranging from who is likely to be the next POTUS, what happens to crude oil prices due to the middle-east situation, whether an earthquake strikes Taiwan on the day of Computex, if something more...
Still waiting for an explanation why one score in the morning completely invalidates the other score in the afternoon, on the same day.
"SF-23 will be unprecedented in terms of speed" - Ferrari CEO before the 2023 F1 season started.
As usual, I return to see garbage analyses being posted and regurgitated for dozens of pages.
These are the two results on Geekbench 5 so far:
[1]
[2]
Now, anybody interested in what "Xen HVM domU" is could do a Google search to find out that it is the Xen hypervisor.
Here's the thing -...
So use the individual scores, across each of SPECint and SPECfp, throw in the individual scores of Geekbench, add every benchmark that spits out a number that implies the higher the better, get the dataset size to acceptable standards for the analysis, and you will still find that what I showed...
Correlation coefficient is NOT used for prediction.
Correlation coefficient is used to accept or reject the null hypothesis.
In this case, the p-value is roughly 0.025, which is less than 0.05 for 95% confidence interval.
So you have to reject the null hypothesis.
Wow, somebody missed their basic statistics class in school. Instead of meandering with silly mafs you could have simply calculated the correlation coefficient.
Here, I did it for ya -
With 5.6% change it is 0.940594.
With 7.8% change, it is 0.926675.
Across the entire data set - for the...
Meh. People who care about such things should probably not update.
It's quite funny seeing folk on the overclock.net forums upset about this cause according to them if you're buying a $700 CPU with a $700 motherboard, you're doing it wrong if you don't overclock.
Conclusion is that if the PPC improvement in SPECint is, for argument's sake, 10%, it is very unlikely that the PPC improvement in Cinebench wouldn't be in the same ballpark.
Unless the CPU design is out-of-whack where it breaks the benchmark itself, 40% core-for-core improvement in SPECint...
Just because it has been measured doesn't mean that it sustained that frequency through the benchmark run.
It is a moot point, because a benchmark usually takes orders of magnitude longer to run compared to the total time for which fMax is observed during that time.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.