If only there was a way to prevent these threads from appearing...
Oh right, I know that: shipping CPUs that are actually stable out of the box, having a spec for them and making mobo manufacturers run them in the spec.
No we're not, it's really just you trying to setup a narrative.
The claim always was >40% per core in SpecInt (so basically even 40.01% would be satisfactory), 32% IPC.
Both claims leave very little wiggle room (the second one literally has none).
We're not "down" anything.
There never was a 45%+ claim, the claim from Kepler was 40% faster in SpecInt 1T per core.
Adroc's claim has always been 32% IPC iso/clk.
But nice attempt at setting up a narrative.
Those chips go into consoles whose manufacturers are notoriously stingy wrt/ die space.
Same reason why these seemingly gaming-oriented chips are equipped with only 8MB L3$ instead of 32MB for desktop equivalents, despite cache being very valuable for gaming.
I mean, what kind of reaction does one expect from such a thread otherwise?
The fact of the matter is that Intel priced their high-end parts based on their performance in benchmarks that are run with unlimited power. What we’ve learnt is that the CPUs either can not sustain this level of...
And you were told that you'd get a good uplift in gaming performance with Zen 5 on DT. But you're not going to get a bespoke CCD that can't be reused on either server or mobile. Because DIY PC is a niche market.
And because it's an enthusiast forum, parts going into 50L+ boxes are ultimately...
reddit moment. Should've guessed.
Explain how on Earth a 20WGP part is supposed to perform at the level of a 6WGP part when it's bigger in every single way? It even has more than twice the membw, which is THE bottleneck for iGPUs?
Here's the H2H comparison with the 2.3GHz bench for anyone interested. Perf is all over the place, there are some regressions, whereas some other tests show obscene gains.
https://browser.geekbench.com/v5/cpu/compare/22427061?baseline=22428039
As said previously, it's pretty pointless to draw...
Yep, some of its patches regularly trickle down into the mainline kernel, apparently.
Pretty unusable outside of this, though, or at least it seemed to be last time I tried it (~4 years ago).
Oh, those are your results. Oh god, what are you doing with your life. lol
Benchmarking on Linux comes with all sorts of interesting caveats tbh. Performance may vary wildly depending on the cpu governor, scheduler, kernel timer frequency, you name it.
I was able to achieve swings ranging from -50% up to +15% of 1T performance in GB5 by tweaking these things on my old...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.